DataVXCellulose Chemistry and TechnologyPaper
journal article·2023-09-29Open access

EFFECTS OF BALL MILLING AND ENZYME TREATMENT ON CELLULOSE ACETYLATION

Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), Dr. Qudrat-i-Khuda Road, Dhaka-1205, Bangladesh, M. MAHBUBUR RAHMAN, MD. NURUL ANWAR KHAN, Department of Chemistry, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh, MD. KAMRUL HASAN, Department of Chemistry, University of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh, MAHBUB ALAM, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), Dr. Qudrat-i-Khuda Road, Dhaka-1205, Bangladesh, M. MOSTAFIZUR RAHMAN, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), Dr. Qudrat-i-Khuda Road, Dhaka-1205, Bangladesh, M. SHAHRIAR BASHAR, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), Dr. Qudrat-i-Khuda Road, Dhaka-1205, Bangladesh, MD. AFTAB ALI SHAIKH, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), Dr. Qudrat-i-Khuda Road, Dhaka-1205, Bangladesh, M. SARWAR JAHAN, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), Dr. Qudrat-i-Khuda Road, Dhaka-1205, Bangladesh

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 57· Issue 7-8
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

A novel process was developed to produce cellulose acetate from bleached hardwood kraft pulp (BHKP) through ball milling and cellulase treatment. The ball milling and/or cellulase treatment of BHKP increased the esterification reaction, but enzyme treatment reduced the viscosity of the produced cellulose acetate (CA). The degree of substitution (DS) values upon acetylation were 2.26 for BHKP, 2.61 for ball-milled BHKP and 2.91 for ball milled followed by cellulase treatment of BHKP. The prepared CA was also characterized by FTIR, XRD, TGA, 1H-NMR and SEM. A strong band for –OH stretching of cellulose disappeared and created a strong band for carbonyl (C=O) group on esterification of BHKP. The crystallinity index of BHKP was 63.3%, which completely disappeared on acetylation, demonstrating the successful esterification of cellulose. The initial weight loss of cellulose acetates was lower than that of the native cellulose, as observed in TGA, indicating the acetylated samples are less hydrophilic. 1H NMR spectroscopy confirmed the complete structure of cellulose acetate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Lignin and Wood Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 K. Edgar, "Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology", edited by H. F. Mark, 3rd ed., vol. 9, Organic Cellulose Esters, Wiley, New York, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1002/0471440264.pst04510.1002/0471440264.pst045 ↗
2. 2 C. M. Buchanan, R. M. Gardner and R. J. Komarek, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 47, 1709 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1993.07047100110.1002/app.1993.070471001 ↗
3. 3 J. Puls, S. A. Wilson and D. Hölter, J. Polym. Environ., 19, 152 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0258-010.1007/s10924-010-0258-0 ↗
4. 4 E. Lv, W. Xia, M. Tang and Y. Pu, BioResources, 12, 296 (2017), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.1.296-315.10.15376/biores.12.1.296-315 ↗
5. 5 D. Bhattacharya, L. T. Germinario and W. T. Winter, Carbohyd. Polym., 73, 371 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.12.00510.1016/j.carbpol.2007.12.005 ↗
6. 6 W. Lan, C. F. Liu and R. C. Sun, J. Agric. Food Chem., 59, 8691 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201508g10.1021/jf201508g ↗
7. 7 R. Zuluaga, J. L. Putaux, A. Restrepo, I. Mondragon and P. Ganán, Cellulose, 14, 585 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9118-z10.1007/s10570-007-9118-z ↗
8. 8 H. M. Shaikh, A. Anis, A. M. Poulose, S. M. Al-Zahrani, N. A. Madhar et al., Molecules, 27, 1434 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2704143410.3390/molecules27041434 ↗
9. 9 C. J. Malm and L. J. Tanghe, Ind. Eng. Chem., 47, 995 (1955), https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50545a03410.1021/ie50545a034 ↗
10. 10 A. Nabili, A. Fattoum, M. C. Brochier-Salon, J. Bras and E. Elaloui, Iranian Polym. J., 26, 137 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-017-0505-510.1007/s13726-017-0505-5 ↗
11. 11 R. G. Candido, G. G. Godoy and A. R. Goncalves, Carbohyd. Polym., 167, 280 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.05710.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.057 ↗
12. 12 D. A. Cerqueira, G. Rodrigues Filho and C. da Silva Meireles, Carbohyd. Polym., 69, 579 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.010 ↗
13. 13 G. Fan, M. Wang, C. Liao, T. Fang, J. Li et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 94, 71 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.073 ↗
14. 14 A. Biswas, B. C. Saha, J. W. Lawton, R. L. Shogren and J. L. Willett, Carbohyd. Polym., 64, 134 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.11.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2005.11.002 ↗
15. 15 A. Hou, X. Wang and L. Wu, Carbohyd. Polym., 74, 934 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.05.01110.1016/j.carbpol.2008.05.011 ↗
16. 16 J. Li, L. P. Zhang, F. Peng, J. Bian, T. Q. Yuan et al., Molecules, 14, 3551 (2009), https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules1409355110.3390/molecules14093551 ↗
17. 17 A. Ria, T. Ferdous, K. M. Yasin Arafat and M. S. Jahan, Biomass Conv. Bioref., 12, 2431 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00741-x10.1007/s13399-020-00741-x ↗
18. 18 M. M. Rahman, M. Alam, M. M. Rahman, M. A. B. H. Susan, M. A. A. Shaikh et al., Carbohyd. Polym. Technol. Appl., 4, 100236 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2022.10023610.1016/j.carpta.2022.100236 ↗
19. 19 M. I. H. Mondal, M. S. Yeasmin and M. S. Rahman, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 79, 144 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.06110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.061 ↗
20. 20 C. Duan, X. Qin, X. Wang, X. Feng, H. Yu et al., Cellulose, 26, 5685 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02461-610.1007/s10570-019-02461-6 ↗
21. 21 S. Yang, B. Yang, C. Duan, D. A. Fuller, X. Wang et al., Bioresour. Ttechnol., 281, 440 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.13210.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.132 ↗
22. 22 Z. Efrati, M. Talaeipour, A. Khakifirouz and B. Bazyar, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 47, 547 (2013), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT7-8(2013)/p.547-551.pdf
23. 23 R. Battisti, E. Hafemann, C. A. Claumann, R. A. F. Machado and C. Marangoni, Polym. Eng. Sci., 59, 891 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2503410.1002/pen.25034 ↗
24. 24 American Polymer Standards Corporation, Mark-Houwnink Parameters for Polymers, http://www.ampolymer.com/Mark-houwnik.html, last revised: March 31, 2022
25. 25 G. Rodrigues Filho, D. S. Monteiro, C. da Silva Meireles, R. M. N. de Assunção, D. A. Cerqueira et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 73, 74 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.11.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2007.11.010 ↗
26. 26 A. M. Das, A. A. Ali and M. P. Hazarika, Carbohyd. Polym., 112, 342 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.00610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.006 ↗
27. 27 A. French, Cellulose, 21, 885 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
28. 28 P. H. F. Pereira, H. L. Ornaghi Júnior, L. V. Coutinho, B. Duchemin and M. O. H. Cioffi, Cellulose, 27, 5745 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03179-610.1007/s10570-020-03179-6 ↗
29. 29 L. A. Soto-Salcido, I. Anugwom, L. Ballinas-Casarrubias, M. Mänttäri and M. Kallioinen, Cellulose, 27, 6831 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03251-110.1007/s10570-020-03251-1 ↗
30. 30 X. W. Sun, C. H. Lu, W. Zhang, D. Tian and X. X. Zhang, Carbohyd. Polym., 98, 405 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.08910.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.089 ↗
31. 31 J. Chen, J. Xu, K. Wang, X. Cao and R. Sun, Carbohyd. Polym., 137, 685 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.03410.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.034 ↗
32. 32 H. S. Barud, A. M. de Araújo Júnior, D. B. Santos, R. M. de Assunção, C. S. Meireles et al., Thermochim. Acta, 471, 61 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2008.02.00910.1016/j.tca.2008.02.009 ↗
33. 33 L. Cao, G. Luo, D. C. Tsang, H. Chen, S. Zhang et al., J. Clean. Prod., 176, 338 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.07710.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.077 ↗
34. 34 S. Yıldız, M. H. Morcali, C. A. Ziba, B. Copcu and M. Dolaz, ChemistrySelect, 4, 8358 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20190039810.1002/slct.201900398 ↗
35. 35 H. Kono, Carbohyd. Res., 375, 136 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2013.04.01910.1016/j.carres.2013.04.019 ↗
36. "