ENZYMATIC UPCYCLING OF BACTERIAL CELLULOSE FROM KOMBUCHA TO OBTAIN CELLOBIOSE
Source abstract
Abstract
"The production of kombucha generates bacterial cellulose (BC) as a by-product, which is usually discarded. However, BC can be a source of cellobiose, a disaccharide with prebiotic benefits. In this study, the yield of cellobiose released from BC collected from a medium-sized kombucha producer was evaluated by enzymatic hydrolysis using the commercial cocktail Celluclast 1.5 L. The BC was hydrolyzed at solid contents of 2, 3 and 4% (m/v), enzyme dosage of 2.2 U/g cellulose, pH 5, 50 °C, and 150 rpm for 72 h. Industrial BC was characterized by FTIR and XRD to confirm the presence of common BC characteristics. The same analyses were performed after enzymatic hydrolysis, resulting in a change in crystallinity. The maximum cellobiose production (10-11 g/L) was obtained with 4% BC (w/v) in 48 h of hydrolysis; there was no significant difference when the time was extended to 72 h. The maximum glucose production under the same conditions was 3 g/L, showing that Celluclast 1.5 L has high cellobiose selectivity (78%). However, the cellobiose yield only ranged from 35 to 26%, indicating that cellobiose accumulation in the medium caused enzyme inhibition."
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Tea Polyphenols and Effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 H. Dutta and S. K. Paul. "Kombucha Drink: Production, Quality, and Safety Aspects. Production and Management of Beverages", Elsevier Inc., 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815260-7.00008-010.1016/B978-0-12-815260-7.00008-0 ↗
2. 2 R. M. D. Coelho, A. L. Almeida, R. Q. G. Amaral, R. N. Mota and P. H. M. Sousa, Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci., 22, 100272 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.10027210.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100272 ↗
3. 3 D. Laureys, S. J. Britton and J. De Clippeleer, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem., 78, 165 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2020.173415010.1080/03610470.2020.1734150 ↗
4. 4 M. G. Soares, M. Lima and V. C. R. Schmidt, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 110, 539 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.01710.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.017 ↗
5. 5 H. Antolak, D. Piechota and A. Kucharska, Antioxidants, 10, 1451 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox1010154110.3390/antiox10101541 ↗
6. 6 S. Dima, D. Panaitescu, C. Orban, M. Ghiurea, S. Doncea et al., Polymers (Basel), 9, 5 (2017), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym908037410.3390/polym9080374 ↗
7. 7 K. E. Emiljanowicz and E. Malinowska-Pańczyk, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 60, 3185 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.167971410.1080/10408398.2019.1679714 ↗
8. 8 E. Leonarski, K. Cesca, O. M. A. Borges, D. Oliveira and P. Poletto, J. Food Process. Preserv., 45, 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.1610010.1111/jfpp.16100 ↗
9. 9 D. Laavanya, S. Shirkole and P. Balasubramanian, J. Clean. Prod., 295, 126454 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12645410.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126454 ↗
10. 10 R. Auta, G. Adamus, M. Kwiecien, I. Radecka and P. Hooley, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 16, 470 (2017), https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJB/article-full-text/735516363098
11. 11 C. Rovera, M. Ghaani, N. Santo, S. Trabattoni, R. T. Olsson et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 6, 7725 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0060010.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00600 ↗
12. 12 E. I. Kashcheyeva, E. K. Gladysheva, E. A. Skiba and V. V. Budaeva, Cellulose, 26, 2255 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-02242-710.1007/s10570-018-02242-7 ↗
13. 13 R. Brandes, L. Souza, C. Carminatti and D. Recouvreux, Int. J. Nanosci., 19, 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219581X1950015710.1142/S0219581X19500157 ↗
14. 14 M. H. L. Silveira, R. S. Aguiar, M. Siika-aho and L. P. Ramos, Bioresour. Technol., 151, 392 (2014), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.13510.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.135 ↗
15. 15 Z. Guo, L. Zhang, Z. Ding, Z. Gu and G. Shi, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 49, 105 (2011), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.02.00810.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.02.008 ↗
16. 16 M. Hu, J. Zha, L. He, Y. Lv, M. Shen et al., Front. Microbiol., 7, 1 (2016), https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00241/full
17. 17 S. Hetzler and A. Steinbüchela, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79, 3122 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03678-1210.1128/AEM.03678-12 ↗
18. 18 B. Brucher and T. Häßler, in "Industrial Enzyme Applications", edited by A. Vogel and O. May, Wiley-VCH, 2019, pp. 167-178, https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527813780.ch2_410.1002/9783527813780.ch2_4 ↗
19. 19 M. A. S. Nakamura, O. Tsuneyuki and M. Ichinose, Nutrition, 20, 979 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2004.08.00510.1016/j.nut.2004.08.005 ↗
20. 20 S. N. Heinritz, E. Weiss, J. Seifert, R. Mosenthin, S. Kuß et al., J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 102, 474 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.1277010.1111/jpn.12770 ↗
21. 21 N. Paßlack and J. Zentek, Kleintierpraxis, 64, 620 (2019), https://doi.org/10.2377/0023-2076-64-620
22. 22 N. Paßlack, B. Kohn, W. Vahjen and J. Zentek, J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 105, 569 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.1348510.1111/jpn.13485 ↗
23. 23 N. Paßlack, W. Vahjen and J. Zentek, J. Equine Vet. Sci., 91, 103106 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2020.10310610.1016/j.jevs.2020.103106 ↗
24. 24 F. Mohammadkazemi, M. Azin and A. Ashori, Carbohyd. Polym., 117, 518 (2015), http://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.008 ↗
25. 25 M. Wada, T. Okano and J. Sugiyama, J. Wood Sci., 47, 124 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0078056010.1007/BF00780560 ↗
26. 26 E. Leonarski, K. Cesca, C. C. Pinto, S. Y. G. González, D. Oliveira et al., Cellulose 29, 7613 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04743-y10.1007/s10570-022-04743-y ↗
27. 27 B. Anwar, B. Bundjali and I. Arcana, Procedia Chem., 16, 279 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2015.12.05110.1016/j.proche.2015.12.051 ↗
28. 28 S. C. Corgié, H. M. Smith and L. P. Walker, Biotechnol. Bioeng, 108, 1509 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.2309810.1002/bit.23098 ↗
29. 29 M. Salari, M. S. Khiabani, R. R. Mokarram, B. Ghanbarzadeh and H. S. Kafil, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 122, 280 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.13610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.136 ↗
30. 30 D. K. Arserim-Uçar, F. Korel, L. S. Liu and K. L. Yam, Food Chem., 336, 127597 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12759710.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127597 ↗
31. 31 F. He, H. Yang, L. Zeng, H. Hu and C. Hu, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 43, 927 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02289-610.1007/s00449-020-02289-6 ↗
32. 32 R. T. A. Machado, A. B. Meneguin, R. M. Sábio, D. F. Franco and S. G. Antonio, Ind. Crop. Prod., 122, 637 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.04810.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.048 ↗
33. 33 C. J. Grande, F. G. Torres, C. M. Gomez and M. C. Bañó, Acta Biomater., 5, 1605 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.02210.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.022 ↗
34. 34 K. Lee, F. Quero, J. J. Blaker, C. A. S. Hill and S. J. Eichhorn et al., Cellulose, 18, 595 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z ↗
35. 35 C. Ruan, Y. Zhu, X. Zhou, N. Abidi, Y. Hu et al., Cellulose, 23, 3417 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1065-010.1007/s10570-016-1065-0 ↗
36. 36 C. Castro, R. Zuluaga, J. Putaux, G. Caro, I. Mondragon et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 84, 96 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.07210.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.072 ↗
37. 37 S. Dubey, R. K. Sharma, P. Agarwal, J. Singha, N. Sinha et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 96, 52 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.01610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.016 ↗
38. 38 H. Khan, V. Saroha, S. Raghuvanshi, A. K. Bharti and D. Dutt, Carbohyd. Polym., 260, 117807 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11780710.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117807 ↗
39. 39 W. Soemphol, P. Hongsachart and V. Tanamool, Mater. Today Proc., 5, 11159 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.03610.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.036 ↗
40. 40 M. P. Illa, C. S. Sharma and M. Khandelwal, J. Mater. Sci., 54, 12024 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03737-910.1007/s10853-019-03737-9 ↗
41. 41 K. Kafle, H. Shin, C. M. Lee, S. Park and S. H. Kim, Sci. Rep., 5, 1 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1510210.1038/srep15102 ↗
42. 42 L. A. Ivanova, K. B. Ustinovich, T. V. Khamova, E. V. Eneyskaya, Y. E. Gorshkova et al., Materials (Basel), 13, 2087 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1309208710.3390/ma13092087 ↗
43. 43 C. Rovera, S. Luti, L. Pazzagli, E. L. Heeley, C. Wan et al., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 139, 1 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5188610.1002/app.51886 ↗
44. 44 A. Karnaouri, L. Matsakas, S. Bühler, M. N. Muraleedharan, P. Christakopoulos et al., Catalysts, 9, 897 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3390/catal911089710.3390/catal9110897 ↗
45. "