RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO ELECTRO-FENTON PROCESS FOR DEGRADATION OF RED BEMACID AS TEXTILE DYE MODEL

Laboratory of Plant Chemistry-Water-Energy, Process Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Esalem City, 02000, Chlef, Algeria; Kelthoum MAAMAR; Chahinaz FARES; Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Chlef, Algeria; Izzedine SAMEUT BOUHAIK; University of Chlef, LPTPM, Esalem City, 02000, Chlef, Algeria; Larbi MAHMOUDI; Laboratory of Plant Chemistry-Water-Energy, Process Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Esalem City, 02000, Chlef, Algeria; Bassam G. N. MUTHANNA; Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Technology, Saad Dahlab University of Blida 1, Blida, Algeria; MUSTAPHA DOUANI; Laboratory of Plant Chemistry-Water-Energy, Process Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Esalem City, 02000, Chlef, Algeria

doi:10.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2023.57.78

journal article·2023-09-29Open access

RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO ELECTRO-FENTON PROCESS FOR DEGRADATION OF RED BEMACID AS TEXTILE DYE MODEL

Laboratory of Plant Chemistry-Water-Energy, Process Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Esalem City, 02000, Chlef, Algeria, Kelthoum MAAMAR, Chahinaz FARES, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Chlef, Algeria, Izzedine SAMEUT BOUHAIK, University of Chlef, LPTPM, Esalem City, 02000, Chlef, Algeria, Larbi MAHMOUDI, Laboratory of Plant Chemistry-Water-Energy, Process Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Esalem City, 02000, Chlef, Algeria, Bassam G. N. MUTHANNA, Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Technology, Saad Dahlab University of Blida 1, Blida, Algeria, MUSTAPHA DOUANI, Laboratory of Plant Chemistry-Water-Energy, Process Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Esalem City, 02000, Chlef, Algeria

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 57· Issue 7-8

Publisher page Open full text

Source abstract

Abstract

The textile industry produces persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that pose significant risks to ecosystems because of their toxic and hazardous nature. Consequently, there is an urgent requirement for the development of effective techniques to treat the effluents and remove these compounds. This work studied the viability of the Electro-Fenton (EF) process as a potential alternative for treating textile wastewater contaminated with POPs. A batch electrochemical reactor, equipped with a platinum grid cathode and stainless-steel sacrificial anode, was utilized to eliminate Red Bemacid (RB) dye. The study investigated the impact of four key operational parameters: (i) stirring speed (rpm), (ii) oxygen flow rate (L/min), (iii) supporting electrolyte concentration [Na2SO4] (mg/L), and (iv) current intensity (A), as well as their interactions on RB removal. To perform this, Central Composite Experimental Design (CCD) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) were employed. Under optimized EF conditions for RB removal (stirring speed = 205.09 rpm, oxygen flow rate = 0.20 L/min, current intensity = 0.306 A, and supporting electrolyte concentration = 0.09 M), the EF process demonstrated exceptional removal efficiency, achieving approximately 94.51% removal of RB. The obtained results showed that the kinetic data of RB removal were in good agreement with the Behnajady-Modirshahla-Ghanbery (BMG) model. The CCD analysis revealed that the main effect of the current intensity had a significant impact on RB removal, as well as the interaction of all paired variables.

Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

Energy storage Metals & alloys Composites

OpenAlex topics: Advanced oxidation water treatment · Dye analysis and toxicity · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references

1. "1 M. Teymori, H. Khorsandi, A. A. Aghapour, S. J. Jafari and R. Maleki, Appl. Water Sci., 10, 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1123-510.1007/s13201-019-1123-5 ↗

2. 2 T. M. Do, J. Y. Byun and S. H. Kim, Catal. Today, 295, 48 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.01610.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.016 ↗

3. 3 R. Rekik, M. Hamza, M. Jaziri and R. Abdelhedi, Arab. J. Chem., 13, 357 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.00110.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.001 ↗

4. 4 P. S. Vassileva, I. M. Uzunov and D. K. Voykova, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 56, 1117 (2022), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.10010.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.100 ↗

5. 5 M. Visa, M. Cosnita, M. Moldovan, C. A. Marin and M. Mihaly, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 3887 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1808388710.3390/ijerph18083887 ↗

6. 6 N. Ouslimani and M. Maallem, ISJAEE, 62, 219 (2008)

7. 7 K. Cruz-González, O. Torres-Lopez, A. M. García-León, E. Brillas, A. Hernández-Ramírez et al., Desalination, 286, 63 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.00510.1016/j.desal.2011.11.005 ↗

8. 8 A. A. Alvarez-Gallegos and S. Silva-Martínez, in "Electro-Fenton Process. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry", edited by M. Zhou, M. Oturan and I. Sirés, Springer, Singapore, 2018, vol. 61, pp. 287-312, https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_7310.1007/698_2017_73 ↗

9. 9 M. Shoorangiz, M. R. Nikoo, M. Salari, G. R. Rakhshandehroo and M. Sadegh, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 132, 340 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.01110.1016/j.psep.2019.10.011 ↗

10. 10 P. H. Chang, Y. H. Huang, C. L. Hsueh, M. C. Lu and G. H. Huang, Water Sci. Technol., 49, 213 (2004), https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.026610.2166/wst.2004.0266 ↗

11. 11 M. Radwan, M. G. Alalm and H. Eletriby, J. Water Process Eng., 22, 155 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.02.00310.1016/j.jwpe.2018.02.003 ↗

12. 12 H. Mohammadi, B. Bina and A. Ebrahimi, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 117, 200 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.00110.1016/j.psep.2018.05.001 ↗

13. 13 G. Divyapriya and P. V. Nidheesh, ACS Omega, 5, 4725 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b0420110.1021/acsomega.9b04201 ↗

14. 14 R. Q. Al-Khafaji and A. H. A. Mohammed, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 518, 062007 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/518/6/06200710.1088/1757-899X/518/6/062007 ↗

15. 15 N. Oturan and M. A. Oturan, in "Electrochemical Water and Wastewater Treatment", edited by C. A. Martínez-Huitle, M. A. Rodrigo and O. Scialdone, Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2018, pp. 193-221, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813160-2.00008-010.1016/B978-0-12-813160-2.00008-0 ↗

16. 16 A. R. Khataee, M. Zarei and L. Moradkhannejhad, Desalination, 258, 112 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.02810.1016/j.desal.2010.03.028 ↗

17. 17 A. K. Abdessalem, N. Bellakhal, N. Oturan, M. Dachraoui and M. A. Oturan, Desalination, 250, 450 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.07210.1016/j.desal.2009.09.072 ↗

18. 18 V. V. Kuznetsov, Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 84, 525 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1134/S107036321403020710.1134/S1070363214030207 ↗

19. 19 M. Zhou, M. A. Oturan and I. Sires, in "Electro-Fenton Process. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry", edited by M. Zhou, M. Oturan and I. Sirés, Springer, Singapore, 2018, vol. 61, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6406-710.1007/978-981-10-6406-7 ↗

20. 20 A. Tabai, O. Bechiri, H. Ferdenache and M. Abbessi, Synthèse: Revue des Sciences et de la Technologie, 34, 1 (2017), https://www.ajol.info/index.php/srst/article/view/157233

21. 21 P. V. Nidheesh, H. Olvera-Vargas, N. Oturan and M. A. Oturan, in "Electro-Fenton Process. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry", edited by M. Zhou, M. Oturan and I. Sirés, Springer, Singapore, 2018, vol. 61, pp. 85-110, https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_7210.1007/698_2017_72 ↗

22. 22 E. Marlina, E3S Web of Conferences, 125, 03003 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20191250300310.1051/e3sconf/201912503003 ↗

23. 23 P. V. Nidheesh and R. Gandhimathi, Desalination, 299, 1 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.01110.1016/j.desal.2012.05.011 ↗

24. 24 W. Zhang, J. Chen, J. Wang, C. X. Cui, B. Wang et al., Water J., 13, 128 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/w1302012810.3390/w13020128 ↗

25. 25 C. T. Wang, W. L. Chou, M. H. Chung and Y. M. Kuo, Desalination, 253, 129 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.11.02010.1016/j.desal.2009.11.020 ↗

26. 26 M. M. Ghoneim, H. S. El-Desoky and N. M. Zidan, Desalination, 274, 22 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.06210.1016/j.desal.2011.01.062 ↗

27. 27 M. Panizza and G. Cerisola, Water Res., 43, 339 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.02810.1016/j.watres.2008.10.028 ↗

28. 28 K. M. Nair, V. Kumaravel and S. C. Pillai, Chemosphere, 269, 129325 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12932510.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129325 ↗

29. 29 A. R. Khataee, M. Safarpour, M. Zarei and S. Aber, J. Mol. Catal. A. Chem., 363, 58 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2012.05.01610.1016/j.molcata.2012.05.016 ↗

30. 30 M. Guo, M. Lu, H. Zhao, F. Lin, F. He et al., J. Hazard. Mater., 423, 127033 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12703310.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127033 ↗

31. 31 H. He and Z. Zhou, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 2100 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.140567310.1080/10643389.2017.1405673 ↗

32. 32 M. A. Behnajady, N. Modirshahla and F. Ghanbary, J. Hazard. Mater., 148, 98 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.00310.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.003 ↗

33. 33 J. N. Hakizimana, B. Gourich, M. Chafi, Y. Stiriba, C. Vial et al., Desalination, 404, 1 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.01110.1016/j.desal.2016.10.011 ↗

34. 34 K. K. Salam, A. O. Arinkoola, E. O. Oke and J. O. Adeleye, Petroleum Coal, 56, 19 (2014), https://www.vurup.sk/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2017/07/pc_1_2014_salam_245-3.pdf

35. 35 M. B. Kasiri and A. R. Khataee, Desalination, 270, 151 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.03910.1016/j.desal.2010.11.039 ↗

36. 36 S. Choojit, T. Ruengpeerakul and C. Sangwichien, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 52, 247 (2018), https://cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT3-4(2018)/p.247-257.pdf

37. 37 P. Kaur and R. Kaur, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 1001 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.8610.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.86 ↗

38. 38 C. A. Floudas and V. Visweswaran, "Quadratic Optimization. Handbook of Global Optimization", 1995, pp. 217-269, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2025-2_510.1007/978-1-4615-2025-2_5 ↗

39. 39 C. Sidney Santana, M. D. Nicodemos Ramos, C. C.Vieira Velloso and A. Aguiar, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 1602 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1609160210.3390/ijerph16091602 ↗

40. 40 N. U. H. Khan, H. N. Bhatti, M. Iqbal and A. Nazir, Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, 233, 361 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2018-119410.1515/zpch-2018-1194 ↗

41. 41 J. Fu, Y. Zhao and Q. Wu, J. Hazard. Mater., 144, 499 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.07110.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.071 ↗

42. 42 S. Hammami, PhD Thesis, Environmental Sciences, Université de Marne la Vallée, France, 2008, https://theses.hal.science/tel-00740155

43. "