CHARACTERIZATION OF UNBLEACHED PULP FROM EMPTY FRUIT BUNCHES OF OIL PALM AS A RAW MATERIAL FOR BROWN PAPER
Source abstract
Abstract
Improper disposal of palm biomass wastes resulting from industrial palm oil production may contribute to the environmental issues in Indonesia. However, given their abundance and availability, empty fruit bunches (EFB) can be potentially considered as a raw material for unbleached pulp. In this study, unbleached pulp was produced from oil palm EFB by a pulping process with alkaline pretreatment. FT-IR analysis confirmed the presence of cellulose in the pulp, with absorption peaks at 3332 cm-1 corresponding to the O-H stretching and at 1029 cm-1 assigned to the stretching of the C-O-C bond, respectively. SEM images revealed the aspect of individual fibers, with a rigid appearance, in the pulp obtained from EFB biomass. The major crystalline peak was observed at 2θ of 22.41°, indicating the presence of cellulose. Brown paper was made from the unbleached pulp (A4 size, with a grammage of 134 g/m2 and a thickness of 219.3 μm) and proved to have excellent mechanical strength. Therefore, unbleached pulp from oil palm EFB can be recommended to be used in the manufacture of brown paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Lignin and Wood Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 M. Choudhary and K. Grover, in "Fruit Oils: Chemistry and Functionality", edited by Md. Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Springer-Nature, 2019, pp. 789-80210.1007/978-3-030-12473-1_42 ↗
2. 2 K. O. Purnama, D. Setyaningsih, E. Hambali and D. Taniwiryono, Int. J. Oil Palm, 3, 40 (2020), https://doi.org/10.35876/ijop.v3i2.4710.35876/ijop.v3i2.47 ↗
3. 3 N. Hastuti, H. Setiawan, K. Kanomata and T. Kitaoka, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 56, 737 (2022), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.6510.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2022.56.65 ↗
4. 4 S. Handayani, IOP Conf. Ser.: J. Phys., 1763, 012086 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1763/1/01208610.1088/1742-6596/1763/1/012086 ↗
5. 5 P. Hariyadi, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 418, 012003 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/418/1/01200310.1088/1755-1315/418/1/012003 ↗
6. 6 J. Junaedi, Int. J. Social Sci., 2, 1779 (2022), https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i4.413710.53625/ijss.v2i4.4137 ↗
7. 7 D. A. F. Zuhdi, M. F. Abdullah, M. S. W. Suliswanto and S. T. Wahyudi, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19, 111 (2021), https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v19i1.1319310.29259/jep.v19i1.13193 ↗
8. 8 V. Subramaniam, S. K. Loh and A. A. Aziz, Sustain. Prod. Cons., 28, 1552 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.00410.1016/j.spc.2021.09.004 ↗
9. 9 E. Hambali and M. Rivai, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 65, 012050 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/65/1/01205010.1088/1755-1315/65/1/012050 ↗
10. 10 H. Umar, S. Sulaiman, M. M. Said, A. Gungor, M. Shahbaz et al., Biomass Bioenerg., 151, 106179 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.10617910.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106179 ↗
11. 11 T. M. I. Mahlia, N. Ismail, N. Hossain, A. S. Silitonga and A. H. Shamsuddin, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26, 14849 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04563-x10.1007/s11356-019-04563-x ↗
12. 12 M. Zulqarnain, H. M. Yusoff, M. Ayoub, M. Hamza Nazir et al., ChemBioEng Rev., 8, 439 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.20210000710.1002/cben.202100007 ↗
13. 13 Y. Wu, M. Fei, T. Chen, R. Qiu and W. Liu, Ind. Crop. Prod., 170, 113744 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11374410.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113744 ↗
14. 14 K. M. Salleh, S. Zakaria, M. S. Sajab, S. Gan and H. Kaco, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 131, 50 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.02810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.028 ↗
15. 15 K. M. Salleh, S. Zakaria, M. S. Sajab, S. Gan, C. H. Chia et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 118, 1422 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.15910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.159 ↗
16. 16 S. Savitri, F. Reguyal and A. K. Sarmah, Environ. Pollut., 318, 120879 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.12087910.1016/j.envpol.2022.120879 ↗
17. 17 E. B. Yahya, H. A. Khalil, M. I. Ahmad, S. Rizal and S. Muhammad, Ind. Crop. Prod., 191, 115897 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11650010.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116500 ↗
18. 18 E. Derman, R. Abdulla, H. Marbawi and M. K. Sabullah, Renew. Energ., 129, 285 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.00310.1016/j.renene.2018.06.003 ↗
19. 19 P. Khunnonkwao and C. Phosiran, Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 14, 17149 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03888-510.1007/s13399-023-03888-5 ↗
20. 20 T. Kume, S. Matsuhashi, S. Hashimoto, M. R. Awang, H. Hamdini et al., Radiat. Phys. Chem., 42, 727 (1993), https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-806X(93)90361-W10.1016/0969-806X(93)90361-W ↗
21. 21 S. Gea, M. Surga, S. Rahayu, M. Marpongahtun, Y. A. Hutapea et al., in Procs. 3rd International Seminar on Chemistry: Green Chemistry and Its Role for Sustainability, ISOC 2018 - Surabaya, Indonesia, AIP Publishing, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.508246810.1063/1.5082468 ↗
22. 22 C. L. Yiin, S. Ho, S. Yusup, A. T. Quitain, Y. H. Chan et al., Bioresour. Technol., 290, 121797 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.12179710.1016/j.biortech.2019.121797 ↗
23. 23 Erwinsyah, S. Sugesty and T. Hidayat, Jurnal Selulosa, 2, 8 (2012), http://jurnalselulosa.org/index.php/jselulosa/article/view/27/27
24. 24 S. F. Dina, L. Indriati, N. Elyani and M. A. Zamzami, Jurnal Selulosa, 11, 9 (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.25269/jsel.v11i01.33010.25269/jsel.v11i01.330 ↗
25. 25 N. A. Ramlee, J. Naveen and M. Jawaid, Construct. Build. Mater., 271, 121519 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12151910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121519 ↗
26. 26 B. E. Dale and M. J. Moreira, in Procs. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp., United States, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 1982
27. 27 W. L. Marsden, P. P. Gray and M. Mandels, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 3, 235 (1985), https://doi.org/10.3109/0738855850915078510.3109/07388558509150785 ↗
28. 28 Muryanto, Y. Sudiyani and H. Abimanyu, Jurnal Kimia Terapan Indonesia, 18, 27 (2016)10.14203/jkti.v18i01.37 ↗
29. 29 A. Adewuyi and F. V. Pereira, Makara Journal of Science, 22, 121 (2018)10.7454/mss.v22i3.7548 ↗
30. 30 I. Y. A. Fatah, H. Abdul Khalil, M. S. Hossain, A. A. Aziz, Y. Davoudpour et al., Polymers, 6, 2611 (2014), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym610261110.3390/polym6102611 ↗
31. 31 V. Hospodarova, E. Singovszka and N. Stevulova, Am. J. Anal. Chem., 9, 303 (2018), https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2018.9602310.4236/ajac.2018.96023 ↗
32. 32 S. M. Razali and K. F. Kasim, Sains Malaysiana, 51, 1061 (2022), http://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2022-5104-0910.17576/jsm-2022-5104-09 ↗
33. 33 E. Xu, D. Wang and L. Lin, Forests, 11, 87 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/f1101008710.3390/f11010087 ↗
34. 34 M. A. Guancha-Chalapud, J. Gálvez, L. Serna-Cock and C. N. Aguilar, Sci. Rep., 10, 11637 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68368-610.1038/s41598-020-68368-6 ↗
35. 35 T. Taipale, M. Österberg, A. Nykänen, J. Ruokolainen and J. Laine, Cellulose, 17, 1005 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9431-910.1007/s10570-010-9431-9 ↗
36. 36 F. S. Ismail, A. Z. M. Asa'ari, N. A. M. Yussof, L. Chin Hao, F. N. M. Padzil et al., J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 999 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.177989610.1080/15440478.2020.1779896 ↗
37. 37 W. Fatriasari and A. H. Iswanto, J. Eng. Technol. Sci., 47, 149 (2015), https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2015.47.2.410.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2015.47.2.4 ↗
38. 38 Z. Daud, M. Z. Mohd Hatta, A. S. Mohd Kassim and H. Awang, Appl. Mech. Mater., 773, 1215 (2015), https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.121510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.1215 ↗
39. 39 M. Jaouadi, S. Msahli and F. Sakli, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 26, 567 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1080/1042691090312487810.1080/10426910903124878 ↗
40. 40 W. Sridach, Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 32, 201 (2010)
41. "