PREPARATION OF BIODEGRADABLE CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSEBASED HYDROGELS AND THEIR DUAL APPLICATION IN FERTILIZER CONTROLLED RELEASE AND CATIONIC DYE REMOVAL
Source abstract
Abstract
"Contamination of the environment by agrochemicals and organic dyes has become a serious issue. In the current study, bioadsorbents based on carboxymethyl cellulose have been synthesized by performing graft copolymerization of crosslinked poly(acrylamide-co-maleic acid) chains onto carboxymethyl cellulose. The synthesized hydrogels were characterized by FTIR, XRD, SEM and TGA. The swelling properties showed that the hydrogels exhibited thermo- and pH-responsive behavior. The incorporation of fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) into the hydrogel at the time of synthesis was carried out. The fertilizer release mechanism followed the Fickian transport model. The toxic cationic dye (methylene blue) removal study was carried out in dye contaminated aqueous solution at neutral pH. The adsorption kinetics fitted well with the pseudo-second order model. The mechanism of the adsorption process was determined from the intra-particle diffusion model. The aim of this work has been to predict the possibility of using the prepared hydrogels in agriculture and wastewater treatment."
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 K. Varaprasad, T. Jayaramudu and E. R. Sadiku, Carbohyd. Polym., 164, 186 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.09410.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.094 ↗
2. 2 F. Andrade, M. M. Roca-Melendres, E. F. Durán-Lara, D. Rafael and S. Schwartz, Cancers, 5, 13 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers1305116410.3390/cancers13051164 ↗
3. 3 H. Zhao and Y. Li, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 586, 124 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.12427010.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124270 ↗
4. 4 S. Bennour and F. Louzri, Adv. Chem., 2014, 1 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/14739810.1155/2014/147398 ↗
5. 5 X. Lin, Q. Ma, J. Su, C. Wang, R. K. Kankala et al., Molecules, 24, 2089 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2411208910.3390/molecules24112089 ↗
6. 6 R. Michalik and I. Wandzik, Polymers, 12, 2425 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1210242510.3390/polym12102425 ↗
7. 7 F. Louzri and S. Bennour, J. Polym. Mater., 37, 55 (2020), https://doi.org/10.32381/JPM.2020.37.1-2.510.32381/JPM.2020.37.1-2.5 ↗
8. 8 T. T. C. Truong, N. T. T. Vo, K. D. Nguyen and H. M. Bui, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 53, 573 (2019), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.5710.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.57 ↗
9. 9 S. Samsami, M. Mohamadi, M. H. Sarrafzadeh, E. R. Rene and M. Firoozbahr, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 143, 138 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.03410.1016/j.psep.2020.05.034 ↗
10. 10 A. M. Abdel Ghaffar, M. B. El-Arnaouty, A. A. Abdel Baky and S. A. Shama, Des. Monomer. Polym., 19, 706 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/15685551.2016.120963010.1080/15685551.2016.1209630 ↗
11. 11 M. F. Zaltariov, D. Filip, C. D. Varganici and D. Macocinschi, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 52, 619 (2018), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2205253110.3390/ijms22052531 ↗
12. 12 Z. Abdollahi, E. N. Zare, F. Salimi, I. Goudarzi, F. R. Tay et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22, 2531 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2205253110.3390/ijms22052531 ↗
13. 13 H. Hamedi, S. Moradi, S. M. Hudson and A. E. Tonelli, Carbohyd. Polym., 199, 445 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.11410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.114 ↗
14. 14 A. Hebeish, A. Higazy, A. El-Shafei and S. Sharaf, Carbohyd. Polym., 79, 60 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.07.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2009.07.022 ↗
15. 15 F. Louzri and S. Bennour, J. Polym. Eng., 38, 437 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2017-0074.10.1515/polyeng-2017-0074
16. 16 N. Pavandi, E. Taghavi and N. Anarjan, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 375 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.3610.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.36 ↗
17. 17 A. V. Sorokin, V. A. Kuznetsov and M. S. Lavlinskaya, Polym. Bull., 78, 2975 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03250-z10.1007/s00289-020-03250-z ↗
18. 18 V. Alexeev, "Analyse Qualitative", 4th ed., Mir Publishing House, Moskow, 1980
19. 19 Y. Bao, J. Ma and N. Li, Carbohyd. Polym., 84, 76 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.06110.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.061 ↗
20. 20 W. Li, B. Sun and P. Wu, Carbohyd. Polym., 78, 454 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.05.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2009.05.002 ↗
21. 21 C. Vasile, G. G. Bumbu, R. P. Dumitriu and G. Staikos, Eur. Polym. J., 40, 1209 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.12.02310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.12.023 ↗
22. 22 E. Karadağ, D. Saraydin, Y. Çaldiran and O. Güven, Polym. Adv. Technol., 11, 59 (2000), https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1581(200002)11:2<59::AID-PAT937>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1099-1581(200002)11:2<59::AID-PAT937>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
23. 23 I. Nakagawa and J. L. Walter, J. Chem. Phys., 51, 1389 (1969), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.167218610.1063/1.1672186 ↗
24. 24 N. S. V. Capanema, A. A. P. Mansur, A. C. de Jesus, S. M. Carvalho, L. C. de Oliveira et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 106, 1218 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.12410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.124 ↗
25. 25 M. A. Villetti, J. S. Crespo, M. S. Soldi, A. T. N. Pires, R. Borsali et al., J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 67, 295 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101390251095210.1023/A:1013902510952 ↗
26. 26 B. R. Nayak and R. P. Singh, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81, 1776 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.161010.1002/app.1610 ↗
27. 27 M. Ś. Żeliazkow, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 91, 1233 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.09.00610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.09.006 ↗
28. 28 R. C. Weast, "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics", The Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 53rd ed., 1972, https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.1972084092110.1002/ange.19720840921 ↗
29. 29 C. S. Brazel, and N. A. Peppas, Macromolecules, 28, 8016 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00128a00710.1021/ma00128a007 ↗
30. 30 R. Katiyar, D. S. Bag and I. Nigam, Adv. Mater. Lett., 5, 214 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.5185/amlett.2013.853210.5185/amlett.2013.8532 ↗
31. 31 H. Wang, Z. Wang and B. Zhu, React. Funct. Polym., 67, 225 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.11.00410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.11.004 ↗
32. 32 L. Daoud and S. Bennour, Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 94, 1499 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1134/S107042722111005710.1134/S1070427221110057 ↗
33. 33 P. L. Ritger and N. A. Peppas, J. Control. Release, 5, 23 (1987), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-410.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-4 ↗
34. 34 P. L. Ritger and N. A. Peppas, J. Control. Release, 5, 37 (1987), https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-3659(87)90035-610.1016/0168-3659(87)90035-6 ↗
35. 35 S. Lagergren, Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handlingar, 24, 1 (1898)
36. 36 Y. S. Ho and G. McKay, Chem. Eng. Technol., 70, 115 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-0467(98)00076-110.1016/S0923-0467(98)00076-1 ↗
37. 37 W. J. Weber and C. J. Morris, in Procs. 1st International Conference on Water Pollution Research, Oxford, 1962, pp. 231-266
38. 38 M. Alkan, O. Demirbaş and M. Doğan, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 101, 388 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.12.00710.1016/j.micromeso.2006.12.007 ↗
39. 39 I. A. W. Tan and B. H. Hameed, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 10, 2565 (2010), https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.2565.257110.3923/jas.2010.2565.2571 ↗
40. 40 H. Tang, W. Zhou and L. Zhang J. Hazard. Mater., (209-210), 218 (2012), https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.01010.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.010 ↗
41. 41 S. Rahimi Aqdam, D. E. Otzen, N. M. Mahmoodi and D. Morshedi, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 602, 490 (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.17410.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.174 ↗
42. "