"CELLULASE PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION BY BACILLUS AERIUS THROUGH RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY IN SUBMERGED FERMENTATION "
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to get better production of FPase from Bacillus aerius (MG597041) by optimizing different process parameters under submerged fermentation through the statistical approach. Optimization of physical factors of culturing medium by one factor at a time (OFAT) revealed optimum incubation time of 24 h, inoculum size of 1%, pH 5.5, and substrate concentration of 4%. Plackett-Burman design (PBD) was performed to identify the significant nutritional influence of cellulase production. Among the nine parameters screened, peptone, yeast extract, FeSO4 and K2HPO4 were found significant. CCD of significant parameters revealed maximum FPase activity (127.4 IU/mL/min) at the optimum concentration of yeast extract of 0.5 g/L, peptone of 0.5 g/L, FeSO4 of 0.2 g/L, and K2HPO4 of 0.02 g/L. ANOVA was used to analyze these results. The analysis of the results showed an F-value of 8.74 and a p-value 0.00. Maximum hydrolysis of 10% of raw Bombax ceiba seed pods using this indigenous cellulase was obtained after 24 h. Also, the study explored the potential of the obtained cellulase to be applied in denim biostoning finishing. The findings demonstrated the efficient use of the obtained enzyme in saccharification of raw Bombax ceiba seed pods, which can be of interest for production of biofuel, and in biostoning treatment of denim fabrics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biofuel production and bioconversion · Enzyme Production and Characterization · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 S. Lavudi, S. O. M. Harinder and N. Laximi, Helix, 3, 261 (2013)
2. 2 N. Darabzadeh, Z. Hamidi‐Esfahani and P. Hejazi, Food Sci. Nutr., 7, 572 (2018), https//doi/full/10.1002/fsn3.85210.1002/fsn3.852 ↗
3. 3 R. N. da Silva, L. F. de Andrade Melo and C. L. L. Finkler, Biotechnol. Rep., 29, e00599 (2021), https//doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2021.e0059910.1016/j.btre.2021.e00599 ↗
4. 4 X. Liming and S. Xueliang, Bioresour. Technol., 91, 259 (2004), https//doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00195-010.1016/S0960-8524(03)00195-0 ↗
5. 5 R. R. Singhania, R. K. Sukumaran, A. K. Patel, C. Larroche and A. Pandey, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 46, 541 (2010), https//doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.03.01010.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.03.010 ↗
6. 6 Y. Abdulhadi and V. Ashish, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 605 (2021), https//doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.4910.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.49 ↗
7. 7 A. Shweta, Biotechnol. Res., 1, 108 (2015)
8. 8 M. Ghazanfar, M. Irfan and M. Nadeem, Energy Sources, Part A, 40, 1114 (2018), https//doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.147429110.1080/15567036.2018.1474291 ↗
9. 9 T. Indumathi, R. Jayaraj, P. S. Kumar, V. G. Krishnaswamy, A. A. Ghfar et al., Chemosphere, 287, 132088 (2022), https//doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13208810.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132088 ↗
10. 10 V. K. Nathan, M. E. Rani, R. Gunaseeli and N. D. Kannan, J. Clean. Prod., 203, 926 (2018), https//doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.33510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.335 ↗
11. 11 M. Sežun, G. Lavric and S. Malalan, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 54, 83 (2020), https//doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.0910.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.09 ↗
12. 12 V. S. Santhi, A. Gupta, S. Saranya and S. R. D. Jebakumar, Biotechnol. Rep., 1, 8 (2014), https//doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2014.05.00210.1016/j.btre.2014.05.002 ↗
13. 13 A. Thakkar and M. Saraf, Nat. Prod. Bioprosp., 4, 341 (2014), https//doi.org/10.1007/s13659-014-0046-y10.1007/s13659-014-0046-y ↗
14. 14 S. Mrudula and R. Murugammal, Braz. J. Microbiol., 42, 1119 (2011), https//doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822011000300003310.1590/S1517-83822011000300033 ↗
15. 15 F. D. Otajevwo and H. S. A. Aluyi, Modern Appl. Sci., 5, 141 (2011), https//doi.org/10.5539/mas.v5n3p141
16. 16 T. Shankar and L. Isaiarasu, Global J. Biotechnol. Biochem., 7, 1 (2012)
17. 17 H. Zhang and J. Wu, Environ. Technol. Innov., 26, 102238 (2022), https//doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.10223810.1016/j.eti.2021.102238 ↗
18. 18 M. Ghazanfar, M. Irfan, M. Nadeem, H. A. Shakir, M. Khan et al., Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 821 (2021), https//doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.6910.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.69 ↗
19. 19 S. Khalid, M. Irfan, H. A. Shakir and J. I. Qazi, J. Marine Sci. Technol., 25, 581 (2017), https//doi.org/10.6119/JMST-017-0518-1
20. 20 T. K. Ghose, Pure Appl. Chem., 59, 257 (1987), https//doi.org/10.1351/pac19875902025710.1351/pac198759020257 ↗
21. 21 M. Irfan, J. Bakhtawar, H. A. Shakir, M. Khan and S. Ali, Int. J. Biol. Chem., 12, 28 (2019), https://doi.org/10.26577/ijbch-2019-v2-410.26577/ijbch-2019-v2-4 ↗
22. 22 C. M. Wang, C. L. Shyu, S. P. Ho and S. H. Chiou, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 47, 46 (2008), https//doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02385.x10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02385.x ↗
23. 23 A. Das, S. Bhattacharya and L. Murali, Am.-Euras. J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 8, 685 (2010)
24. 24 M. Irfan, Q. Mushtaq, F. Tabssum, H. A. Shakir and J. I. Qazi, AMB Exp., 7, 1 (2017), https//doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0331-310.1186/s13568-017-0331-3 ↗
25. 25 Y. L. Liang, Z. Zhang, M. Wu, Y. Wu and J. X. Feng, BioMed. Res. Int., 2014, 512497 (2014), https//doi.org/10.1155/2014/51249710.1155/2014/512497 ↗
26. 26 M. Irfan, A. Safdar, Q. Syed and M. Nadeem, Turk. J. Biochem., 37, 120 (2012), https//doi.org/10.5505/tjb.2012.0970910.5505/tjb.2012.09709 ↗
27. 27 A. Sharma, R. Tewari and S. K. Soni, Int. J. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 9, 76 (2015)
28. 28 Y. O. Kim, H. K. Kim, K. S. Bae, J. H. Yu and T. K. Oh, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 22, 2 (1998), https//doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(97)00096-310.1016/S0141-0229(97)00096-3 ↗
29. 29 S. Singh, V. S. Moholkar and A. Goyal, 3Biotech, 4, 411 (2014), https//doi.org/10.1007/s13205-013-0169-610.1007/s13205-013-0169-6 ↗
30. 30 A. Nkohla, K. Okaiyeto, A. Olaniran, U. Nwodo, L. Mabinya et al., J. Biotech. Res., 8, 33 (2017)
31. 31 S. Acharya and A. Chaudhary, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 70, 142 (2011)
32. 32 T. Shankar and L. Isaiarasu, Middle-East J. Sci. Res., 8, 40 (2011)
33. 33 A. Anjum, M. Irfan, F. Tabbsum, H. A. Shakir and J. I. Qazi, Adv. Life Sci., 5, 19 (2017)
34. 34 M. Ghazanfar, M. Irfan, M. Nadeem, H. A. Shakir, M. Khan et al., Fermentation, 8, 148 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation804014810.3390/fermentation8040148 ↗
35. 35 F. Tabssum, M. Irfan, H. A. Shakir and J. I. Qazi, J. Biol. Eng., 12, 7 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0097-410.1186/s13036-018-0097-4 ↗
36. 36 K. Murashima, A. Kosugi and R. H. Doi, J. Bacteriol., 184, 5088 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.18.5088-5095.200210.1128/JB.184.18.5088-5095.2002 ↗
37. 37 R. Gautam and J. Sharma, Int. J. Sci. Res. (Raipur), 3, 1759 (2012)
38. "