SIMULTANEOUS DYEING AND FINISHING OF COTTON FABRICS USING RED OCHER EARTH PIGMENT
Source abstract
Abstract
A novel approach to the pad-dry cure method was employed to prepare concurrently dyed and finished cotton samples. The innovative approach integrates a layer-by-layer pigment dyeing procedure for obtaining varying shades of Red Ocher (RO) and functionalities on dyed cotton. Following the dyeing process, advanced characterization techniques, such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), were employed to confirm the presence of RO and its effect on the fabric. The findings of this unique study indicated exceptional UV protection factors, laundering, and light fastness of dyed cotton. Additionally, an observable trend emerged, indicating an increase in thermal resistance with an augmented number of padded layers, while conversely, a decrease in thermal conductivity was observed. These insightful and novel findings offer exciting opportunities for broader thermal insulation cotton textile applications distinguished by outstanding UV protection and color retention.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 B. T. H. Otaviano, M. Sannomiya, F. S. de Lima, M. M. P. Tangerina, C. I. Tamayose et al., Mater. Chem. Phys., 293, 126766 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12676610.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126766 ↗
2. 2 A. Danila, Renew. Dyes Pigments, 2024, 253 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15213-9.00006-510.1016/B978-0-443-15213-9.00006-5 ↗
3. 3 S. Adeel, F. Rehman, Bisma, A. Naseer, N. Habib et al., in "Functional and Technical Textiles", edited by S. Maity, K. Singha and P. Pandit, Woodhead Publishing, 2023, pp. 177-211, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91593-9.00015-810.1016/B978-0-323-91593-9.00015-8 ↗
4. 4 N. A. Ibrahim, A. R. El-Gamal, M. Gouda and F. Mahrous, Carbohyd. Polym., 82, 1205 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2010.06.05410.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.054 ↗
5. 5 S. Saxena and A. S. M. Raja, in "Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing", edited by S. Muthu, Springer, Singapore, 2014, pp. 37-80, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-065-0_210.1007/978-981-287-065-0_2 ↗
6. 6 M. Shahid, Shahid-Ul-Islam and F. Mohammad, J. Clean. Prod., 53, 310 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.03110.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.031 ↗
7. 7 M. Yusuf, M. Shabbir and F. Mohammad, Nat. Prod. Bioprospect., 7, 123 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/S13659-017-0119-910.1007/s13659-017-0119-9 ↗
8. 8 M. Teklay, J. T. Thole, N. Ndumbu, J. Vries and K. Mezger, J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep., 47, 103690 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JASREP.2022.10369010.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103690 ↗
9. 9 M. Gil, M. L. Carvalho, A. Seruya, A. E. Candeias, J. Mirão et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 580, 728 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NIMA.2007.05.13110.1016/j.nima.2007.05.131 ↗
10. 10 M. Elias, C. Chartier, G. Prévot, H. Garay and C. Vignaud, Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 127, 70 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEB.2005.09.06110.1016/j.mseb.2005.09.061 ↗
11. 11 N. Begum, Int. J. Home Sci., 9, 102 (2023), https://www.homesciencejournal.com/archives/2023/vol9issue1/PartB/9-1-25-730.pdf (accessed June 16, 2024)
12. 12 A. Kamboj, S. Jose and A. Singh, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 5380 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.187537810.1080/15440478.2021.1875378 ↗
13. 13 K. M. Salleh, N. A. Z. Armir, N. S. N. Mazlan, C. Wang and S. Zakaria, in "Fundamentals of Natural Fibres and Textiles", edited by Md. Ibrahim H. Mondal, Woodhead Publishing, 2021, pp. 33-63, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821483-1.00014-010.1016/B978-0-12-821483-1.00014-0 ↗
14. 14 M. Tausif, A. Jabbar, M. S. Naeem, A. Basit, F. Ahmad et al., Text. Prog., 50, 1 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/00405167.2018.152809510.1080/00405167.2018.1528095 ↗
15. 15 W. Tegegne, A. Haile, Y. Zeleke, Y. Temesgen, H. Bantie et al., Int. J. Sustain. Eng., 17, 1 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2023.230170210.1080/19397038.2023.2301702 ↗
16. 16 R. Atakan, I. Martínez-González, P. Díaz-García and M. Bonet-Aracil, Sustainability, 16, 227 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/SU1601022710.3390/su16010227 ↗
17. 17 S. Ennaceur, A. Bouaziz, S. Gargoubi, W. Mnif and D. Dridi, Processes, 10, 2263 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/PR1011226310.3390/pr10112263 ↗
18. 18 J. Fang, C. Meng, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, L. Han et al., Fibers Polym., 24, 1367 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/S12221-023-00158-Z10.1007/s12221-023-00158-z ↗
19. 19 E. Werede, S. A. Jabasingh, H. D. Demsash, N. Jaya and G. Gebrehiwot, Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 13, 5219 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-021-01550-610.1007/s13399-021-01550-6 ↗
20. 20 S. Baliarsingh, P. C. Behera, J. Jena, T. Das and N. B. Das, J. Clean. Prod., 102, 485 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.11210.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.112 ↗
21. 21 AATCC TM66-2017 Standard Test Method for Wrinkle Recovery of Woven Fabrics: Recovery Angle. American Association of Textile Chemists Colorists, USA
22. 22 AATCC TM 61-2007 Standard Test Method for Colorfastness to Laundering: Accelerated. American Association of Textile Chemists Colorists, USA
23. 23 AATCC Test Method 16-2004, Colorfastness to Light, American Association of Textile Chemists Colorists, USA
24. 24 AS/NZS, AS/NZS 4399, Sun Protective Clothing - Evaluation and Classification, 1996
25. 25 ISO 5085-1:1989 - Textiles - Determination of thermal resistance - Part 1: Low thermal resistance, https://www.iso.org/standard/11106.html (accessed June 16, 2024)
26. 26 Ş. S. Uğur, Coatings, 13, 1129 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1306112910.3390/coatings13061129 ↗
27. 27 S. Saini, A. Gupta, N. Singh and J. Sheikh, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 82, 138 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.10.00510.1016/j.jiec.2019.10.005 ↗
28. 28 S. Zhang, K. Fang, X. Liu, X. Qiao, J. Wang et al., J. Clean. Prod., 372, 133712 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13371210.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133712 ↗
29. 29 B. M. Kale, J. Wiener, J. Militky, S. Rwawiire, R. Mishra et al., Cellulose, 23, 981 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/S10570-015-0847-010.1007/s10570-015-0847-0 ↗
30. 30 A. K. Samanta, N. S. Awwad and H. M. Algarni (Eds.), "Chemistry and Technology of Natural and Synthetic Dyes and Pigments", IntechOpen, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.8319910.5772/intechopen.83199 ↗
31. 31 E. F. Bernstein, H. W. Sarkas and P. Boland, J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 20, 532 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1111/JOCD.1380310.1111/jocd.13803 ↗
32. 32 K. Li, X. Li, Y. Li and C. Wu, J. Nat. Fibers, 20 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.216344810.1080/15440478.2022.2163448 ↗
33. 33 M. I. H. Mondal and J. Saha, J. Polym. Environ., 27, 405 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/S10924-018-1354-910.1007/s10924-018-1354-9 ↗
34. 34 M. D. Teli and P. Pandit, J. Ind. Text., 48, 87 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1177/152808371772511310.1177/1528083717725113 ↗
35. 35 S. Mallakpour, Z. Radfar and C. M. Hussain, Appl. Clay Sci., 206, 106054 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLAY.2021.10605410.1016/j.clay.2021.106054 ↗
36. 36 M. Z. Rahman, C. K. Kundu, H. Nabipour, X. Wang, L. Song et al., Prog. Org. Coat., 163, 106600 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progcoat.2021.10660010.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106600 ↗
37. "