journal article·2024-03-15Open access

CHARACTERIZATION OF LIGNIN DISSOLVED DURING ALKALINE SODIUM BOROHYDRIDE AND HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PRETREATMENTS OF SUGAR MAPLE (ACER SACCHARUM)

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, 02044 VTT, Finland, JONI LEHTO, ADRIAAN VAN HEININGEN, Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA, TERO HAAPALA, Laboratory of Applied Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland, JARMO LOUHELAINEN, Laboratory of Applied Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland, HANNU PAKKANEN, Laboratory of Applied Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland, RAIMO ALÉN, Laboratory of Applied Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 58· Issue 1-2

Abstract

Sugar maple (Acer saccharum) wood chips were pretreated with aqueous sodium hydroxide, sodium borohydride, and hydrogen peroxide pretreatments, and the characterization (i.e., amount, molar masses, and molar mass distributions) of the lignin dissolved during the pretreatments was performed. Of the applied pretreatments, especially borohydride pretreatments were efficient in dissolving lignin from this feedstock, as 20% to 28% of the dissolved organics were found to consist of dissolved lignin, contributing to 3.4% to 9.0% of the initial wood lignin. Corresponding values for 2.5% and 5.0% alkaline peroxide pretreatments were from 5.9% to 9.2% dissolved lignin of the total dissolved organics and from 1.1% to 3.2% of the initial wood lignin. Additionally, determined molar masses and molar mass distributions indicated that borohydride pretreatments generally led to the formation of smaller-molar-mass lignin fragments when compared to reference pretreatments and to pretreatments conducted with alkaline peroxide process, indicating more efficient lignin degradation caused by borohydride addition. For example, Mn and Mw values of the analyzed reference effluents were 54%-62% and 66%-71% higher when compared to the corresponding borohydride effluents, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Enzyme-mediated dye degradation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 F. Carvalheiro, L. C. Duarte and F. M. Gírio, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 67, 849 (2008)
2. 2 B. Kamm and M. Kamm, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 64, 137 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1537-710.1007/s00253-003-1537-7 ↗
3. 3 B. Kamm, M. Kamm, P. R. Gruber and S. Kromus, in "Biorefineries - Industrial Processes and Products, Status Quo and Future Directions", edited by B. Kamm, P. R. Gruber and M. Kamm, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2006, pp. 3-4010.1002/9783527619849 ↗
4. 4 C. V. T. Mendes, M. G. V. S. Carvalho, C. M. S. G. Baptista, J. M. S. Rocha, B. I. G. Soares et al., Food Bioprod. Proc., 87, 197 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2009.06.00410.1016/j.fbp.2009.06.004 ↗
5. 5 P. Baijpai, in "Biotechnology for Pulp and Paper Processing", edited by P. Baijpai, Springer, New York, 2012, pp. 375-40210.1007/978-1-4614-1409-4_19 ↗
6. 6 F. Cherubini, Environ. Convers. Manag., 51, 1412 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.01510.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.015 ↗
7. 7 F. Gomes, F. Santos, J. Colodette, I. Demuner and L. Batalha, Nat. Res., 5, 419 (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/nr.2014.5903910.4236/nr.2014.59039 ↗
8. 8 S. Hämäläinen, A. Näyhä and H.-L. Pesonen, J. Clean. Prod., 19, 1884 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.01110.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.011 ↗
9. 9 S. Liu, L. P. Abrahamson and G. M. Scott, Biomass Bioenerg., 39, 1 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.04210.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.042 ↗
10. 10 D. T. Santos, A. V. Ensinas, A. K. Chandel, F. Maréchal and M. A. A. Meireles, Int. J. Chem. Eng., 2014, 1 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/25805710.1155/2014/258057 ↗
11. 11 V. B. Agbor, N. Cicek, R. Sparling, A. Berlin and D. B. Levin, Biotechnol. Adv., 29, 675 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.00510.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.005 ↗
12. 12 P. Kumar, D. M. Barret, M. J. Delwiche and P. Stroeve, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, 3713 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801542g10.1021/ie801542g ↗
13. 13 N. Mosier, C. Wyman, B. Dale, R. Elander, Y. Y. Lee et al., Bioresour. Technol., 96, 673 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.02510.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 ↗
14. 14 C. Vila, J. Romero, J. L. Fransisco, G. Garrote and J. C. Parajó, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 5251 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.00210.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.002 ↗
15. 15 C. Chirat, D. Lachenal and M. Sanglard, Proc. Biochem., 47, 381 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.12.02410.1016/j.procbio.2011.12.024 ↗
16. 16 G. V. Duarte, B. V. Ramarao, T. E. Amidon and P. T. Ferreira, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 9949 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200639u10.1021/ie200639u ↗
17. 17 E. Mateos-Espejel, T. Radiotis and N. Jemaa, TAPPI J., 12, 29 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.32964/TJ12.2.2910.32964/TJ12.2.29 ↗
18. 18 T. Runge and C. Zhang C, TAPPI J., 12, 45 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.32964/TJ12.10.4510.32964/TJ12.10.45 ↗
19. 19 E. Saukkonen, K. Lyytikäinen and K. Backfolk, TAPPI J., 11, 37 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.32964/TJ11.4.3710.32964/TJ11.4.37 ↗
20. 20 A. Istek and E. Gonteki, J. Environ. Biol., 30, 951 (2009)10.1590/S0101-73302009000400002 ↗
21. 21 A. Istek and I. Özkan, Turk. J. Agric. For., 32, 131 (2008)
22. 22 E. D. Dutra, F. Santos, B. R. A. Alencar, A. L. Silva Reis, R. F. Rodriguez de Souza et al., Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 8, 225 (2018), https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13399-017-0277-310.1007/s13399-017-0277-3 ↗
23. 23 M. C. Ho, V. Z. Ong and T. Y. Wu, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 112, 75 (2019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.08210.1016/j.rser.2019.04.082 ↗
24. 24 R. C. Sun, J. Tomkinson, P. L. Ma and S. F. Liang, Carbohyd. Polym., 42, 111 (2000), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(99)00136-810.1016/S0144-8617(99)00136-8 ↗
25. 25 Z. Strassberger, S. Tanase and G. Rothenberg, RSC Adv., 4, 25310 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA04747H10.1039/C4RA04747H ↗
26. 26 S. Saka, in "Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry", edited by D. Hon and N. Shiraishi, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2001, pp 51-81
27. 27 A. Sakakibara and Y. Sano, in "Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry", edited by D. Hon and N. Shiraishi, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2001, pp 109-173
28. 28 B. Swan, Svensk. Papperstidn., 68, 791 (1965)10.1299/jsmemag.68.557_791 ↗
29. 29 R. W. Scott, Anal. Chem., 51, 936 (1979)10.1021/ac50043a036 ↗
30. 30 T.-J. Toivanen and R. Alén, Cellulose, 13, 53 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10570-005-9016-110.1007/s10570-005-9016-1 ↗
31. 31 R. Alén and T. Hartus, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 22, 613 (1988), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/
32. 32 H. Pakkanen and R. Alén, J. Wood. Chem. Technol., 32, 279 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2012.65932110.1080/02773813.2012.659321 ↗
33. 33 M. Ristolainen, R. Alén, and J. Knuutinen, Holzforschung, 50, 91 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1996.50.1.9110.1515/hfsg.1996.50.1.91 ↗
34. "