DataVXCellulose Chemistry and TechnologyPaper
journal article·2024-07-22Open access

FACILE SYNTHESIS OF CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE (CMC) FROM AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES

Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Kawasan Sains Teknologi Dr. (H.C.) Ir. H. Soekarno Jl. Raya Bogor, Cibinong, Indonesia, NOVITRI HASTUTI, HENY HERAWATI, Research Center for Agroindustry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Kawasan Sains Teknologi BJ Habibie, Serpong, Indonesia, FITRIA RIANY ERIS, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia, FERI KUSNANDAR, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia, ICEU AGUSTINISARI, Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Kawasan Sains Teknologi Dr. (H.C.) Ir. H. Soekarno Jl. Raya Bogor, Cibinong, Indonesia, FETRIYUNA FETRIYUNA, Faculty of Agro-Industrial Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jln. Raya Bandung-Sumedang, Jatinangor 45363, Indonesia, INDAH KURNIASARI, Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Kawasan Sains Teknologi Dr. (H.C.) Ir. H. Soekarno Jl. Raya Bogor, Cibinong, Indonesia, MUCHAMAD BACHTIAR, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia, BUDIONO UJAYA PUTRA, Research Center for Agroindustry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Kawasan Sains Teknologi BJ Habibie, Serpong, Indonesia

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 58· Issue 5-6
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

Cellulose derivative products, such as carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), which are used in the food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries, but still rely on cotton-derived cellulose, can be made from oil palm fruit empty bunches (OPEFB) and rice straw. This study examined how sodium monochloroacetic acid (NaMCA) concentration (3, 6, and 9 g) affected the simple synthesis and characteristics of CMC from OPEFB and rice straw cellulose. OPEFB-derived CMC produced with NaMCA (9 g) had the lowest of brightness, while rice straw CMC was brighter. NaMCA modifications altered the onset temperature (Tonset), but not maximum degradation temperature (Tmax), according to thermal analysis. The onset temperatures of OPEFB and rice straw CMC were 40–62 °C and 67–183 °C, respectively. Commercial CMC has an onset temperature of about 27 °C. The EDX analysis showed that rice straw CMC had a higher degree of substitution (DS) of 0.34–1.37 than OPEFB CMC, which had 0.30-0.70. Oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) cellulose and rice straw cellulose offer a viable carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) alternative. This process turns agricultural waste into valuable products and enables for their usage in numerous applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Lignin and Wood Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 G. D. Najafpour, A. A. L. Zinatizadeh, A. R. Mohamed, M. Hasnain Isa and H. Nasrollahzadeh, Process Biochem., 41, 370 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.06.03110.1016/j.procbio.2005.06.031 ↗
2. 2 BPS-Statistics Indonesia, Indonesian Oil Palm Statistics 2022 (BPS-Statistics Indonesia, 2023), https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/11/30/160f211bfc4f91e1b77974e1/statistik-kelapa-sawit-indonesia-2022.html
3. 3 N. Hidayah and I. U. Wusko, Trad. Med. J., 25, 154 (2020), https://doi.org/10.22146/mot.5271510.22146/mot.52715 ↗
4. 4 G. Srivastava, V. Kumar, R. Tiwari, R. Patil, A. Kalamdhad et al., Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 12, 1193 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00736-810.1007/s13399-020-00736-8 ↗
5. 5 A. S. Noah, in "Elaeis Guineensis", edited by H. Kamyab, IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2022, Ch. 10
6. 6 M.-P. Zacharof, Waste Biomass Valoriz., 8, 1011 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9674-210.1007/s12649-016-9674-2 ↗
7. 7 H. P. S. A. Khalil, M. Jawaid, A. Hassan, M. T. Paridah and A. Zaidon, in "Composites and Their Applications", edited by N. Hu, IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2012, Ch. 9
8. 8 M. Thakur, A. Sharma, V. Ahlawat, M. Bhattacharya and S. Goswami, Mater. Sci. Energ. Technol., 3, 328 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.12.00510.1016/j.mset.2019.12.005 ↗
9. 9 S. M. Joseph, S. Krishnamoorthy, R. Paranthaman, J. A. Moses and C. Anandharamakrishnan, Carbohyd. Polym. Technol. Appl., 2, 100036 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2021.10003610.1016/j.carpta.2021.100036 ↗
10. 10 P. K. Gupta, S. S. Raghunath, D. V. Prasanna, P. Venkat, V. Shree et al., in "Cellulose", edited by A. R. Pascual and M. E. E. Martín, IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2019, Ch. 4
11. 11 F. Ansari, A. Sjöstedt, P. T. Larsson, L. A. Berglund and L. Wågberg, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 74, 60 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.024 ↗
12. 12 R. J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen and J. Youngblood, Chem. Soc. Rev., 40, 3941 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00108B10.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
13. 13 L. C. Fidale, T. Heinze and O. A. El Seoud, Carbohyd. Polym., 93, 129 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.06110.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.061 ↗
14. 14 T. Heinze and A. Koschella, Macromol. Symp., 223, 13 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20055050210.1002/masy.200550502 ↗
15. 15 A. I. Bourbon, M. J. Costa, L. C. Maciel, L. Pastrana, A. A. Vicente et al., Foods, 10, 1512 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071512.10.3390/foods10071512 ↗
16. 16 E. T. Reese, R. G. H. Siu and H. S. Levinson, J. Bacteriol., 59, 485 (1950), https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.59.4.485-497.195010.1128/jb.59.4.485-497.1950 ↗
17. 17 S. C. Shit and P. M. Shah, J. Polym., 2014, 427259 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/42725910.1155/2014/427259 ↗
18. 18 A. Z. Sulaiman, A. Ajit and Y. Chisti, Biotechnol. Prog., 29, 1448 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.178610.1002/btpr.1786 ↗
19. 19 S. Pirsa and K. Hafezi, Food Chem., 399, 133967 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.13396710.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133967 ↗
20. 20 R. C. Rowe, P. J. Sheskey and S. C. Owen, "Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients", 6th ed., Pharmaceutical Press, Washington, DC, 2009
21. 21 M. S. Rahman, M. S. Hasan, A. S. Nitai, S. Nam, A. K. Karmakar et al., Polymers (Basel), 13, 1345 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1308134510.3390/polym13081345 ↗
22. 22 B. Yimlamai, W. Choorit, Y. Chisti and P. Prasertsan, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 96, 1656 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.668910.1002/jctb.6689 ↗
23. 23 M. Mondal, M. S. Rahman, S. Yeasmin and M. A. Sayeed, in "Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives", edited by M. Mondal, Nova Science Publisher, New York, 2015, pp. 205-226
24. 24 V. Pushpamalar, S. J. Langford, M. Ahmad and Y. Y. Lim, Carbohyd. Polym., 64, 312 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.12.00310.1016/j.carbpol.2005.12.003 ↗
25. 25 G. S. Hutomo, D. W. Marseno, S. Anggrahini and Supriyanto, Afr. J. Food Sci., 6, 1 (2012), https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS12.02010.5897/AJFS12.020 ↗
26. 26 S. Alizadeh, M. Mousavi and M. Labbafi, J. Food Process. Technol., 8, 687 (2017), https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.100068710.4172/2157-7110.1000687 ↗
27. 27 J. He, D. Wang, L. Long, Y. Huang, C. Cui et al., J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Sci. Ed., 36, 562 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-021-2445-310.1007/s11595-021-2445-3 ↗
28. 28 R. K. Singh and A. K. Singh, Waste Biomass Valoriz., 4, 129 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-012-9123-910.1007/s12649-012-9123-9 ↗
29. 29 T. Shui, S. Feng, G. Chen, A. Li, Z. Yuan et al., Biomass Bioenerg., 105, 51 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.01610.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.016 ↗
30. 30 P. Rachtanapun, S. Luangkamin, K. Tanprasert and R. Suriyatem, LWT - Food Sci. Technol., 48, 52 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.02.02910.1016/j.lwt.2012.02.029 ↗
31. 31 M. P. Adinugraha, D. W. Marseno and Haryadi, Carbohyd. Polym., 62, 164 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.01910.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.019 ↗
32. 32 F. Dimawarnita and T. Panji, E-Journal Menara Perkeb., 86, 96 (2018), https://doi.org/10.22302/iribb.jur.mp.v86i2.30410.22302/iribb.jur.mp.v86i2.304 ↗
33. 33 V. Kontogiorgos, in "Encylopedia of Dairy Sciences", edited by P. McSweeney and J. McNamara, Academic Press, 2022, pp. 689-69410.1016/B978-0-12-818766-1.00321-4 ↗
34. 34 W. Wongvitvichot, S. Pithakratanayothin, S. Wongkasemjit and T. Chaisuwan, Polym. Degrad. Stabil., 184, 109473 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.10947310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109473 ↗
35. 35 L. Golbaghi, M. Khamforoush and T. Hatami, Carbohyd. Polym., 174, 780 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.12310.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.123 ↗
36. 36 A. Biswas, S. Kim, G. W. Selling and H. N. Cheng, Ind. Crop. Prod., 60, 259 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.00410.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.004 ↗
37. 37 E. O. Udoro, T. A. Anyasi and A. I. O. Jideani, Int. J. Food Prop., 23, 820 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.175962510.1080/10942912.2020.1759625 ↗
38. 38 H. Herawati, E. Kamsiati and Sunarmani, Int. J. Technol., 12, 291 (2021), https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i3.413910.14716/ijtech.v12i3.4139 ↗
39. 39 R. K. Singh and O. P. Khatri, J. Microsc., 246, 43 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03583.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03583.x ↗
40. 40 D. Becker, "Color Trends and Selection for Product Design", William Andrew Publishing, Pennsylvania, 201610.1016/B978-0-323-39395-9.00026-8 ↗
41. 41 N. S. A. Rasid, M. M. Zainol and N. A. S. Amin, Sains Malaysiana, 50, 2523 (2021), https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2021-5009-0310.17576/jsm-2021-5009-03 ↗
42. 42 H. A. Mulyatno, O. I. Pratama and I. Inayati, Equilib. J. Chem. Eng., 1, 1 (2017), https://doi.org/10.20961/equilibrium.v1i2.4041910.20961/equilibrium.v1i2.40419 ↗
43. 43 H. S. Wahyuni, S. Yuliasmi, H. S. Aisyah and D. Riati, Maced. J. Med. Sci., 7, 3878 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.52410.3889/oamjms.2019.524 ↗
44. 44 K. Konovalenko, Y. Beznosyk and L. Bugaieva, Technol. Audit Prod. Reserv., 6, 15 (2021), https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2021.24477710.15587/2706-5448.2021.244777 ↗
45. 45 FAO, "Compendium of Food Additive Specifications: 74th Meeting 2011", Rome, 2011
46. 46 S. Park, PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University, 2006, pp. 1-157
47. 47 D. M. Parid, N. A. Rahman, A. S. Baharuddin, M. P. Mohammed, A. M. Johari et al., BioResources, 13, 535 (2018)
48. 48 A. Parihar, J. Vongsvivut and S. Bhattacharya, ACS Omega, 4, 8747 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0368110.1021/acsomega.8b03681 ↗
49. 49 B. Peng, H. Zhang and Y. Zhang, Fuel, 248, 56 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.06910.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.069 ↗
50. 50 N. F. A.-Z. T. Mohamood, A. H. Abdul Halim and N. Zainuddin, Polymers (Basel), 13, 4056 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1323405610.3390/polym13234056 ↗
51. 51 L. Tan, R. Shi, Q. Ji, B. Wang, F. Quan et al., Polym. Polym. Compos., 25, 309 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1177/09673911170250040810.1177/096739111702500408 ↗
52. 52 M. El-Sakhawy, H. A. S. Tohamy, A. Salama and S. Kamel, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 53, 667 (2019), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.6510.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2019.53.65 ↗
53. 53 M. V Ramiah, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 14, 1323 (1970), https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1970.07014051810.1002/app.1970.070140518 ↗
54. 54 L. von Schantz, H. Schagerlöf, E. Nordberg Karlsson and M. Ohlin, BMC Biotechnol., 14, 113 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-014-0113-910.1186/s12896-014-0113-9 ↗
55. 55 A. K. Veeramachineni, T. Sathasivam, S. Muniyandy, P. Janarthanan, S. J. Langford et al., Appl. Sci., 6, 170 (2016), https://doi.org/10.3390/app606017010.3390/app6060170 ↗
56. 56 P. J. R. Barros, D. P. R. Ascheri, M. L. S. Santos, C. C. Morais, J. L. R. Ascheri et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 144, 208 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.07410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.074 ↗
57. 57 S. Sophonputtanaphoca, P. Chutong, K. Cha-Aim and P. Nooeaid, Int. Food Res. J., 26, 969 (2019)
58. 58 D. Peng, W. Jin, M. Arts, J. Yang, B. Li et al., Food Hydrocoll., 107, 105955 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10595510.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105955 ↗
59. 59 W. Ren, H. Liang, S. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Chen et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 257, 128661 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12866110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128661 ↗
60. "