journal article·2025-03-10Open access

SYNERGISTIC EFFECT OF HYBRID REINFORCEMENTS ON MECHANICAL AND THERMAL PROPERTIES OF EPOXY COMPOSITES FOR INSULATION MATERIALS – A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar 608002, India, MURUGAN VIGNESH, MUTHU PARANTHAMAN VENKATESH, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar 608002, India

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 59· Issue 1-2

Abstract

The growing concerns regarding environmental sustainability have catalysed the exploration and adoption of sustainable materials across various industries. Polymer composites have emerged as a significant contender in this arena. This research delves into the thermal and mechanical characteristics of epoxy matrix composites reinforced with micron-sized waste paper fillers and hybrid fillers. Utilising the hand lay-up technique, composites were meticulously fabricated with sustainable micro-filler and natural fibre ensuring their uniform dispersion within the epoxy matrix. A comprehensive mechanical assessment of these composites was performed, juxtaposing them against the mechanical properties of the pristine epoxy. This evaluation encompassed tensile, flexural, and hardness tests. Interestingly, an optimal enhancement in thermal and mechanical properties was found at the peak filler concentration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Material Properties and Applications · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 F. Asdrubali, F. D'Alessandro and S. Schiavoni, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 4, 1 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2015.05.00210.1016/j.susmat.2015.05.002 ↗
2. 2 T. Permata, D. Hikmawati and A. M. Ilmah, Ecol. Environ. Conserv., S135, 26 (2020)
3. 3 P. Usubharatana and H. Phungrassami, Environ. Eng. Manag. J., 18, 7 (2019), https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2019.13810.30638/eemj.2019.138 ↗
4. 4 V. Mimini, V. Kabrelian, K. Fackler, H. Hettegger, A. Potthast et al., Holzforschung, 73, 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2018-011110.1515/hf-2018-0111 ↗
5. 5 N. V. Gama, B. Soares, C. S. Freire, R. Silva, C. P. Neto et al., Mater. Des., 76, 77 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.03210.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.032 ↗
6. 6 P. De Bruijn and P. Johansson, Constr. Build. Mater., 47, 1235 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.006 ↗
7. 7 A. B. Cherki, A. Khabbazi, B. Remy and D. Baillis, Energ. Proc., 42, 83 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.00810.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.008 ↗
8. 8 F. Hernández-Olivares, M. R. Bollati, M. Del Rio and B. Parga-Landa, Constr. Build. Mater., 13, 179 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00021-510.1016/S0950-0618(99)00021-5 ↗
9. 9 A. B. Cherki, B. Remy, A. Khabbazi, Y. Jannot and D. Baillis, Constr. Build. Mater., 54, 202 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.07610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.076 ↗
10. 10 Y. Hamzeh, A. Ashori and B. Mirzaei, J. Polym. Environ., 19, 120 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0255-310.1007/s10924-010-0255-3 ↗
11. 11 F. Arhab, B. Djebri, H. Saidi, B. G. N. Muthanna and A. Mebrouki, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 58, 153 (2024), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.1510.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.15 ↗
12. 12 O. Das, K. Babu, V. Shanmugam, K. Sykam, M. Tebyetekerwa et al., Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 158, 112054 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.11205410.1016/j.rser.2021.112054 ↗
13. 13 N. B. Karthik Babu and T. Ramesh, Mater. Res. Express., 6, 105358 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.155550310.1080/15440478.2018.1555503 ↗
14. 14 N. B. Karthik Babu, T. Ramesh and S. Muthukumaran, J. Clean. Prod., 272, 122786 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122786"10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122786 ↗