EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON FREE VIBRATIONAL DAMPING AND DRILLING BEHAVIOR OF FLAX REINFORCED EPOXY COMPOSITES USING ADAPTIVE NEURO FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM
Source abstract
Abstract
Flax reinforced epoxy (F-Ep) composites were prepared by the compression moulding technique, varying the fiber content (0, 25, 35 and 45 wt%). The free vibration test was performed on the neat epoxy and F-Ep composites to understand their dynamic characteristics, and results showed that natural frequency and damping factor of the F-Ep composites increased with an increase in the fiber content. The F-Ep composite (45F-Ep) that exhibited better damping was selected for performing the drilling operation. Factors such as spindle speed (rpm), feed rate (mm/min) and drill point angle (degree) were chosen as input parameters and the tabulated set of experiments were in accordance with Taguchi’s design of experiment. The response measured was thrust force and the obtained values were found in the range of 19.66 to 50.75 N. The minimum value of thrust force was achieved when the F-Ep composite was drilled at high spindle speed (3000 rpm), with a feed rate of 75 mm/min using the drill point angle of 118°. ANOVA analysis showed that the developed regression model was significant and thrust force was mainly influenced by the spindle speed. Mathematical models were developed for drilling F-Ep composite using response surface methodology (RSM) and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and compared for their efficacy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 S. V. Kumar, K. S. Kumar, H. S. Jailani and G. Rajamurugan, Mater. Res. Express., 7, 085302 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abaea510.1088/2053-1591/abaea5 ↗
2. 2 S. V. Kumar, B. Suresha, G. Rajamurugan and A. Megalingam, Mater. Res. Express., 6, 015307 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aae5dc10.1088/2053-1591/aae5dc ↗
3. 3 V. K. Shettahalli Mantaiah, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 12415 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.206040410.1080/15440478.2022.2060404 ↗
4. 4 S. M. Vinu Kumar, C. Sasikumar, E. Sakthivelmurugan and J. P. Rishi, Mater. Technol., 55, 851 (2021), https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2021.25610.17222/mit.2021.256 ↗
5. 5 S. V. Kumar and H. Singh, Indian J. Fibre Text., 48, 326 (2023), https://doi.org/10.56042/ijftr.v48i3.605710.56042/ijftr.v48i3.6057 ↗
6. 6 R. Jeyakumar, S. M. Vinu Kumar, J. P. Rishi and C. Sasikumar, Mater. Res., 27, e20230543 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2023-054310.1590/1980-5373-mr-2023-0543 ↗
7. 7 R. Rajiev, S. V. Kumar, H. Singh and E. Sakthivelmurugan, Indian J. Fibre Text., 48, 396 (2023), https://doi.org/10.56042/ijftr.v48i4.764010.56042/ijftr.v48i4.7640 ↗
8. 8 V. K. Shettahalli Mantaiah, S. K. Kallippatti Lakshmanan and S. Kaliappagounder, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 10367 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.199350410.1080/15440478.2021.1993504 ↗
9. 9 S. M. Vinu Kumar, N. Manikandaprabu, N. Babu and C. Sasikumar, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 58, 101 (2024), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.1010.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.10 ↗
10. 10 E. Sakthivelmurugan, G. Senthilkumar, S. M. Vinu Kumar and H. Singh, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 57, 399 (2023), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2023.57.3510.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2023.57.35 ↗
11. 11 P. K. Bajpai and I. Singh, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 32, 1569 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441349286610.1177/0731684413492866 ↗
12. 12 H. Rezghi Maleki, M. Hamedi, M. Kubouchi and Y. Arao, Mater. Manuf., 34, 283 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2018.153258410.1080/10426914.2018.1532584 ↗
13. 13 A. Lotfi, H. Li and D. V. Dao, J. Nat. Fibers, 17, 1264 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.155815810.1080/15440478.2018.1558158 ↗
14. 14 N. Rajini, J. W. Jappes, S. Rajakarunakaran and P. Jeyaraj, J. Compos. Mater., 47, 3105 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983124626110.1177/0021998312462618 ↗
15. 15 A. Etaati, S. A. Mehdizadeh, H. Wang and S. Pather, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 33, 330 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441351222810.1177/0731684413512228 ↗
16. 16 K. S. Kumar, I. Siva, N. Rajini, P. Jeyaraj and J. W. Jappes, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 33, 1802 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441454678210.1177/0731684414546782 ↗
17. 17 H. Jena, A. K. Pradhan and M. K. Pandit, Adv. Compos. Lett., 23 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1177/09636935140230010310.1177/096369351402300103 ↗
18. 18 M. Uthayakumar, V. Manikandan, N. Rajini and P. Jeyaraj, Mater. Des., 64, 270 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.02010.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.020 ↗
19. 19 C. Bennet, N. Rajini, J. W. Jappes, I. Siva, V. Sreenivasan and S. Amico, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 34, 293 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441557068310.1177/0731684415570683 ↗
20. 20 S. Arulmurugan and N. Venkateshwaran, Polym. Polym. Compos., 24, 507 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1177/09673911160240070910.1177/096739111602400709 ↗
21. 21 C. Arvinda Pandian and H. Siddhi Jailani, Polym. Bull., 75, 1997 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-017-2139-310.1007/s00289-017-2139-3 ↗
22. 22 K. Senthilkumar, N. Saba, M. Chandrasekar, M. Jawaid, N. Rajini et al., Constr. Build. Mater., 195, 423 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.08110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.081 ↗
23. 23 K. Sumesh, K. Kanthavel and S. Vivek, Mater. Res. Express., 6, 045318 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaff1a10.1088/2053-1591/aaff1a ↗
24. 24 G. R. Kumar, V. Hariharan and S. Saravanakumar, J. Nat. Fibers, 18, 531 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.163674010.1080/15440478.2019.1636740 ↗
25. 25 M. Chandrasekar, I. Siva, T. S. M. Kumar, K. Senthilkumar, S. Siengchin et al., J. Polym. Environ., 28, 2789 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01814-810.1007/s10924-020-01814-8 ↗
26. 26 G. Rajamurugan, S. Aravindraj and P. E. Sudhagar, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 2885 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.183578210.1080/15440478.2020.1835782 ↗
27. 27 A. A. Nasir, A. Azmi and A. Khalil, Measurement, 75, 298 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.04610.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.046 ↗
28. 28 T. B. Yallew, P. Kumar and I. Singh, J. Mater.: Des. Appl., 230, 888 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071558775010.1177/1464420715587750 ↗
29. 29 V. K. Mahakur, S. Bhowmik and P. K. Patowari, Proc. Ins. Mech. Eng. Part C, 236, 6232 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406221106375210.1177/09544062211063752 ↗
30. 30 B. Kavad, A. Pandey, M. Tadavi and H. Jakharia, Proc. Technol., 14, 457 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.05810.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.058 ↗
31. 31 G. C. Onwubolu and S. Kumar, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 171, 41 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.06410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.064 ↗
32. 32 S. Jayabal, U. Natarajan and U. Sekar, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 55, 263 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3030-710.1007/s00170-010-3030-7 ↗
33. 33 T. Valarmathi, K. Palanikumar, S. Sekar and B. Latha, Mater. Manuf., 35, 469 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.171193110.1080/10426914.2020.1711931 ↗
34. 34 A. Karthik and P. Sampath, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 45, 267 (2020), https://doi.org/10.56042/ijftr.v45i3.2723810.56042/ijftr.v45i3.27238 ↗
35. 35 C. Anjinappa, O. S. Ahmed, M. Abbas, A. A. Alahmadi, M. Alwetaishi et al., Processes, 10, 2735 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1012273510.3390/pr10122735 ↗
36. 36 A. Kumar, H. Singh and V. Kumar, Mater. Manuf., 33, 1483 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.140172710.1080/10426914.2017.1401727 ↗
37. 37 T. Rajamurugan, C. Rajaganapathy, S. Jani, C. S. Gurram, H. L. Allasi et al., Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., (2022), https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/948156610.1155/2022/9481566 ↗
38. 38 D. S. Tran, V. Songmene and A. D. Ngo, Neural. Comput. Appl., 33, 11721 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05869-z10.1007/s00521-021-05869-z ↗
39. 39 D. Karaboga and E. Kaya, Artif. Intell. Rev., 52, 2263 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9610-210.1007/s10462-017-9610-2 ↗
40. 40 A. Azmi, Adv. Eng. Softw., 82, 53 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.12.01010.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.12.010 ↗
41. 41 N. Manikandan, K. Balasubramanian, D. Palanisamy, P. Gopal, D. Arulkirubakaran et al., Mater. Manuf., 34, 1866 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2019.168926410.1080/10426914.2019.1689264 ↗
42. 42 G. Özden, M. Ö. Öteyaka and F. M. Cabrera, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 36, 493 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705721101307010.1177/08927057211013070 ↗
43. 43 S. T. Kumaran, T. J. Ko, R. Kurniawan, C. Li and M. Uthayakumar, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 31, 3949 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-0741-910.1007/s12206-017-0741-9 ↗
44. 44 M. Marani, V. Songmene, M. Zeinali, J. Kouam and Y. Zedan, Neural. Comput. Appl., 32, 8115 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04314-610.1007/s00521-019-04314-6 ↗
45. 45 S. M. Vinu Kumar, C. Sasikumar, E. Sakthivelmurugan and J. Rishi, Mater. Technol., 55, 851 (2021), https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2021.25610.17222/mit.2021.256 ↗
46. 46 E. Sakthivelmurugan, G. Senthil Kumar, S. M. Vinu Kumar and H. Singh, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 45 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04339-y10.1007/s40430-023-04339-y ↗
47. 47 M. Rajesh and J. Pitchaimani, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 35, 228 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441561197310.1177/0731684415611973 ↗
48. 48 M. Rajesh, S. P. Singh and J. Pitchaimani, J. Ind. Text., 47, 938 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1177/152808371667915710.1177/1528083716679157 ↗
49. 49 E. Sakthivelmurugan and S. M. Vinu Kumar, Mater. Res., 26, e20230108 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2023-010810.1590/1980-5373-mr-2023-0108 ↗
50. "