"CHITOSAN OLIGOMERS – SYNTHESIS, CHARACTERIZATION AND PROPERTIES "
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper presents the synthesis of chitosan oligomers with different polymerization degrees (PD) by chitosan depolymerization in the presence of nitrous acid, aiming to study the correlation between their polymerization degree and their properties. Seven oligomers were synthesized and purified. The oligomers were characterized from the structural point of view by FTIR, NMR and UV-Vis spectroscopy, revealing the formation of shorter chains with an ending unit of 2.5-D-anhydromannofuranose. The morphology evaluation at micro and nano levels by SEM and AFM revealed the granular morphology of the oligomer films, while WXRD and POM demonstrated their higher degree of ordering, in comparison with the parent chitosan. The antimicrobial tests showed the potential of the synthesized compounds to be used for biomedical purposes, the oligomers presenting antifungal activity, which increased with the decrease in their polymerization degree, especially against Aspergillus niger.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications · Antimicrobial agents and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 S. Kou, L. M. Peters and M. Mucalo, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 169, 85 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.00510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.005 ↗
2. 2 S. Kou, L. Peters and M. Mucalo, Carbohyd. Polym., 282, 119132 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11913210.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119132 ↗
3. 3 A. Anisiei, A.-C. Bostanaru, M. Mares and L. Marin, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 785 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.6510.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.65 ↗
4. 4 S. Kim, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2018, 1708172 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/170817210.1155/2018/1708172 ↗
5. 5 G. Graham Allan and M. Peyron, Carbohyd. Res., 277, 273 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(95)00208-B10.1016/0008-6215(95)00208-B ↗
6. 6 B. B. Aam, E. B. Heggset, A. L. Norberg, M. Sortie, K. M. Varum et al., Mar. Drugs, 215, 1482 (2010), https://doi.org/10.3390/md1409016710.3390/md14090167 ↗
7. 7 V. K. Mourya, N. N. Inamdar and Y. M. Choudhari, Polym. Sci. A, 53, 583 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X1107006610.1134/S0965545X11070066 ↗
8. 8 K. V. Harish Prashanth and R. N. Tharanathan, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1722, 117 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.11.00910.1016/j.bbagen.2004.11.009 ↗
9. 9 K.-T. Shen, M.-H. Chen, H.-Y. Chan, J.-H. Jeng and Y.-J. Wang, Food Chem. Toxicol., 47, 1864 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.04.04410.1016/j.fct.2009.04.044 ↗
10. 10 R. E. Xing, S. Liu, H. H. Yu, Z. Y. Guo, P. B. Wang et al., Carbohyd. Res., 340, 2150 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2005.06.02810.1016/j.carres.2005.06.028 ↗
11. 11 K. Sato, H. Saimoto, M. Moromoto and Y. Shigemasa, Fiber, 59, 104 (2003), https://doi.org/10.2115/fiber.59.10410.2115/fiber.59.104 ↗
12. 12 T. Wu, S. Zivanovic, D. G. Hayes and J. Weiss, J. Agric. Food Chem., 56, 5112 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1021/jf073136q10.1021/jf073136q ↗
13. 13 R. Yoksan, M. Akashi, M. Miyata and S. Chirachanchai, Radiat. Res., 161, 471 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1667/rr312510.1667/RR3125 ↗
14. 14 A. Einbu and K. M. Vårum, Biomacromolecules, 8, 309 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060853510.1021/bm0608535 ↗
15. 15 G. Graham Allan and M. Peyron, Carbohyd. Res., 277, 257 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(95)00207-a10.1016/0008-6215(95)00207-A ↗
16. 16 K. Tømmeraas, K. M. Vårum, B. E. Christensen and O. Smidsrød, Carbohyd. Res., 333, 137 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6215(01)00130-610.1016/S0008-6215(01)00130-6 ↗
17. 17 M. R. Kasaai, J. Arul and G. Charlet, The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 508540 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/50854010.1155/2013/508540 ↗
18. 18 E. Salim, D. Ailincai and S. Trombotto, Molbank, 2014, M832 (2014), https://doi.org/10.3390/M83210.3390/M832 ↗
19. 19 D. Ailincai, I. Rosca, S. Morariu, L. Mititelu-Tartau and L. Marin, Carbohyd. Polym., 276, 118727 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11872710.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118727 ↗
20. 20 A. W. Bauer, D. M. Perry and W. M. Kirby, A.M.A. Arch. Inter. Med., 104, 208 (1959), https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1959.0027008003400410.1001/archinte.1959.00270080034004 ↗
21. 21 M.-M. Iftime, I. Rosca, A.-I. Sandu and L. Marin, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 205, 574 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.07710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.077 ↗
22. 22 L. Marin, D. Ailincai, M. Mares, E. Paslaru, M. Cristea et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 117, 762 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.0502410.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.050 ↗
23. 23 J. Kumirska, M. Czerwicka, Z. Kaczyński, A. Bychowska, K. Brzozowski et al., Mar. Drugs, 8, 1567 (2010), https://doi.org/10.3390/md805156710.3390/md8051567 ↗
24. 24 L. Fritsch, V. Lavayen and A. A. Merlo, Liq. Cryst., 45, 1802 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/02678292.2018.148828010.1080/02678292.2018.1488280 ↗
25. 25 I. Leceta, P. Guerrero, I. Ibarburu, M. T. Dueñas and K. de la Caba, J. Food Eng., 116, 889 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.02210.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.022 ↗
26. "