EFFECT OF VARIOUS CHEMICAL TREATMENTS ON PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND THERMAL PROPERTIES OF ERYTHRINA VARIEGATA FIBERS: APPLICATION IN EPOXY COMPOSITES
Source abstract
Abstract
Recently, there has been an increasing trend in utilizing lignocellulosic fiber reinforced composites in structural applications within the construction and automobile industries, replacing conventional materials based on metals and their derivatives. In the present study, Erythrina variegata fibers (EVFs) were subjected to a number of chemical treatments individually (alkalization, benzoyl peroxide, potassium permanganate, and stearic acid treatments). The effects of these chemical treatments on the EVFs were examined through chemical composition analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). This comprehensive analysis aimed to assess the suitability of the chemically treated EVFs for use as reinforcement in thermoset polymer matrix composites. The alkali treated fibers (AEVFs) were found as optimum and were then used as reinforcement in epoxy adhesives. Different fiber loadings (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 wt%) were incorporated into the epoxy matrix to investigate their effects on the properties of the composites. Therefore, the tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength, and thermal stability of the prepared composites were evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. The findings collectively suggested that the epoxy composites reinforced with 20 wt% of AEVFs exhibited promising characteristics for lightweight structural applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 S. Thanga Kasi Rajan, K. J. Nagarajan, V. Balasubramani, K. Sathickbasha, M. R. Sanjay et al., Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 126, 103492 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10349210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103492 ↗
2. 2 V. Balasubramani, K. J. Nagarajan, M. Karthic and R. Pandiyarajan, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 259, 129273 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.12927310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129273 ↗
3. 3 P. Manimaran, M. Prithiviraj, S. S. Saravanakumar, V. P. Arthanarieswaran and P. Senthamaraikannan, J. Nat. Fibers, 15, 860 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2017.137630110.1080/15440478.2017.1376301 ↗
4. 4 A. Saravanakumaar, A. Senthilkumar, S. S. Saravanakumar, M. R. Sanjay and A. Khan, Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact., 23, 529 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2018.150193110.1080/1023666X.2018.1501931 ↗
5. 5 I. I. Mukhtar, Z. Leman, E. S. Zainudin and M. R. Ishak, J. Nat. Fibers, 17, 877 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.153787210.1080/15440478.2018.1537872 ↗
6. 6 P. Pandiarajan and M. Kathiresan, Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact., 23, 442 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2018.147432710.1080/1023666X.2018.1474327 ↗
7. 7 P. V. Reddy, D. Mohana Krishnudu and P. Rajendra Prasad, J. Nat. Fibers, 18, 1094 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.168706310.1080/15440478.2019.1687063 ↗
8. 8 D. Mohana Krishnudu, D. Sreeramulu and P. V. Reddy, J. Nat. Fibers, 17, 1775 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.159891710.1080/15440478.2019.1598917 ↗
9. 9 R. S. Reddy, D. Mohana Krishnudu, P. Rajendra Prasad and P. V. Reddy, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 1851 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.178849410.1080/15440478.2020.1788494 ↗
10. 10 A. N Balaji and K. J. Nagarajan, Carbohyd. Polym., 174, 200 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.06510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.065 ↗
11. 11 K. J. Nagarajan, N. R. Ramanujam, M. R Sanjay, S. Siengchin, B. Surya Rajan et al., Polym. Compos., 42, 1588 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2592910.1002/pc.25929 ↗
12. 12 S. K. Sahoo, J. R. Mohanty, S. Nayak and B. Behera, J. Nat. Fibers, 18, 1762 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.169799510.1080/15440478.2019.1697995 ↗
13. 13 V. S. Sreenivasan, D. Ravindran, V. Manikandan and R. Narayanasamy, Mater. Design, 37, 111 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.00410.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.004 ↗
14. 14 A. Alawar, A. M. Hamed and K. Al-Kaabi, Compos. B: Eng., 40, 601 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.018 ↗
15. 15 D. Bachtiar, S. M. Sapuan and M. M. Hamdan, Mater. Design, 29, 1285 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2007.09.00610.1016/j.matdes.2007.09.006 ↗
16. 16 V. G. Fiore, Di Bella and A. Valenza, Compos. B: Eng., 68, 14 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.025 ↗
17. 17 M. M. Haque, M. Hasan, M. S. Islam and M. E. Ali, Compos. Biores. Technol., 100, 4903 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.07210.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.072 ↗
18. 18 T. H. Nam, S. Ogihara, N. H. Tung and S. Kobayashi, Compos. B: Eng., 42, 1648 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.001 ↗
19. 19 P. Madhu, M. R. Sanjay, P. Senthamaraikannan, S. Pradeep, S. Siengchin et al., J. Nat. Fibers, 17, 833 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.153419110.1080/15440478.2018.1534191 ↗
20. 20 S. A. Paul, A. Boudenne, L. Ibos, Y. Candau, K. Joseph et al., Compos. Part A, 39, 1582 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.06.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2008.06.004 ↗
21. 21 M. M. Devarajan, G. Kumaraguruparan, K. J. Nagarajan and C. Vignesh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 254, 127848 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12784810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127848 ↗
22. 22 G. R. Raghav, K. J. Nagarajan, M. Palaninatharaja, M. Karthic and M. A. Ganesh, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 249, 126119 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12611910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126119 ↗
23. 23 A. Stalin, S. Mothilal, V. Vignesh, M. R. Sanjay and S. Siengchin, J. Ind. Text., 51, 5869S (2022), https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372093816110.1177/1528083720938161 ↗
24. 24 G. R. Raghav, R. A. Kumar, K. J. Nagarajan, C. Vignesh, F. S. Arokiasamy et al., Cellulose Chem. Technol., 57, 855 (2023), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2023.57.7510.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2023.57.75 ↗
25. 25 V. Raghunathan, J. D. J. Dhilip, G. Subramanian, H. Narasimhan, C. Baskar et al., J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 5065 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.187535310.1080/15440478.2021.1875353 ↗
26. 26 U. Patel, R. Ray, A. Mohapatra, S. N. Das and H. C. Das, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 280 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.173959110.1080/15440478.2020.1739591 ↗
27. 27 M. Prithiviraj and R. Muralikannan, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 2730 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.182129110.1080/15440478.2020.1821291 ↗
28. 28 T. Teklu, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 3825 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1848730.10.1080/15440478.2020.1848730 ↗
29. 29 G. Pitchayya Pillai, P. Manimaran and V. Vignesh, J. Nat. Fibers, 18, 2102 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.172377710.1080/15440478.2020.1723777 ↗
30. 30 P. Senthamaraikannan, M. R. Sanjay, K. S. Bhat, N. H. Padmaraj and M. Jawaid, J. Nat. Fibers, 16, 1124 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.145343210.1080/15440478.2018.1453432 ↗
31. 31 K. O. Reddy, C. U. Maheswari, M. S. Dhlamini, B. M. Mothudi, V. P. Kommula et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 188, 85 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.11010.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.110 ↗
32. 32 B. M. Reddy, Y. V. Mohana Reddy, B. C. Mohan Reddy and R. M. Reddy, J. Nat. Fibers, 17, 759 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.153418310.1080/15440478.2018.1534183 ↗
33. 33 R. S. Reddy, D. Mohana Krishnudu, P. Rajendra Prasad and P. V. Reddy, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 1851 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.178849410.1080/15440478.2020.1788494 ↗
34. 34 S. Sekar, S. Suresh Kumar, S. Vigneshwaran and G. Velmurugan, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 1772 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.178848710.1080/15440478.2020.1788487 ↗
35. 35 S. Dharmalingam, O. Meenakshisundaram, V. Elumalai and R. S. Boopathy, J. Nat. Fibers, 18, 2254 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.172623810.1080/15440478.2020.1726238 ↗
36. 36 A. S. Kumaar, A. Senthilkumar, S. S. Saravanakumar, P. Senthamaraikannan, L. Loganathan et al., J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 269 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.173959010.1080/15440478.2020.1739590 ↗
37. 37 B. Muthu Chozha Rajan, S. Indran, D. Divya, P. Narayanasamy, A. Khan et al., J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 3453 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.184870310.1080/15440478.2020.1848703 ↗
38. 38 P. V. Reddy, D. Mohana Krishnudu and P. Rajendra Prasad, J. Nat. Fibers, 18, 1094 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.168706310.1080/15440478.2019.1687063 ↗
39. 39 S. M. Darshan and B. Suresha, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 6377 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.192165410.1080/15440478.2021.1921654 ↗
40. 40 G. L. Devnani and S. Sinha, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 6564 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.192964610.1080/15440478.2021.1929646 ↗
41. 41 S. Nayak, S. K. Khuntia, S. D. Mohanty, J. Mohapatra and T. K. Mall, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 630 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.175828210.1080/15440478.2020.1758282 ↗
42. 42 B. Shivamurthy, N. Naik, B. H. S. Thimappa and R. Bhat, Mater. Today: Proc., 28, 2116 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.01610.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.016 ↗
43. 43 G. L. C. Coura, R. T. S. Freire, J. C. dos Santos, L. A. de Oliveira, F. Scarpa et al., Compos. Part C, 2, 100017 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10001710.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100017 ↗
44. 44 K. J. Nagarajan, A. N. Balaji, K. S. Basha, N. R. Ramanujam and R. A. Kumar, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 152, 327 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.25510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.255 ↗
45. "