DataVXCellulose Chemistry and TechnologyPaper
journal article·2023-07-20Open access

EXTRACTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF NATURAL CELLULOSE FIBERS FROM REED STRAW: MORPHOLOGICAL, MICROSTRUCTURAL AND THERMAL PROPERTIES

College of Textiles Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China, DUOQING FU, ZHENG LIU, College of Textiles Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China, YINZHI YANG, College of Textiles Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China, YUYANG WU, College of Textiles Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China, XINWANG CAO, College of Textiles Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China, WEI KE, College of Textiles Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China, SHENGYU LI, College of Textiles Science and Engineering, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 57· Issue 5-6
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

As an available resource rich in cellulose, agricultural residues have attracted a lot of interest for textile and other applications. Herein, reed straw fiber was obtained from a typical agricultural waste – reed straw – by an alkali-oxygen one-bath process. The effects of the amount of sodium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide, the treatment temperature and time on the degumming rate were discussed. The optimum technological parameters of the alkali-oxygen one-bath process were found as follows: the dosage of sodium hydroxide was 35 g/L, the dosage of hydrogen peroxide – 30 mL/L, treatment temperature – 85 °C and cooking time – 2 h. Under these conditions, the degumming rate achieved was 54.30%. The prepared fiber will be considered as a promising and sustainable raw material for the textile industry and other applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 1 L. Siim, Y. Patrik and H. Leena, Renew. Energ., 124, 18 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.05010.1016/j.renene.2017.09.050 ↗
2. 2 L. Guo and J. Zhao, Arab. J. Geosci., 14, 1357 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07797-710.1007/s12517-021-07797-7 ↗
3. 3 P. A. Seglah, W. Yang, H. Wang, Y. Bi, K. Zhou et al., J. Clean. Prod., 261, 121191.2 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12119110.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121191 ↗
4. 4 X. E. Cao, Anal. Chem., 93, 15804 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c0479410.1021/acs.analchem.1c04794 ↗
5. 5 E. Uitterhaegen, J. Parinet, L. Labonne, T. Merian, S. Ballas et al., Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 113A, 256 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.038 ↗
6. 6 Y. Li, S. Yan, Z. Li, S. Xiong, S. Yang et al. J. Mater. Chem. A, 10, 16224 (2022), https://doi.org/2022/ta/d2ta04566d10.1039/D2TA04566D ↗
7. 7 Z. Xue, W. Cheng, L. Wang and G. Song, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 25, 3320 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-2263-310.1007/s12205-021-2263-3 ↗
8. 8 H. Milan, F. Katarina and K. Tatiana, Chem. Select, 4, 6061 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20190056210.1002/slct.201900562 ↗
9. 9 W. Shuai, N. Chen and B. Li, Biomass Bioenerg., 92, 46 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.06.00210.1016/j.biombioe.2016.06.002 ↗
10. 10 M. Krstic, Z. Maksimovic, S. Ibrić, T. Bakic, J. Prodanovic et al., Cellulose Chem. Technol., 52, 580 (2018), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT7-8(2018)/p.577-588.pdf
11. 11 L. Zheng, Y. Du and J. Zhang, Bioresour. Technol., 78, 90 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00154-110.1016/S0960-8524(00)00154-1 ↗
12. 12 J. Lojewska, P. Miskowiec, T. Lojewski and L. M. Proniewicz, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 88, 513 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.012 ↗
13. 13 L. Ye, J. Zhang, J. Zhao, Z. Luo, S. Tu et al., J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 114, 178 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.05.01610.1016/j.jaap.2015.05.016 ↗
14. 14 Y. Cui, M. Jia, L. Liu, R. Zhang, L. Cheng et al., Text. Res. J., 88, 11 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1177/004051751770360110.1177/0040517517703601 ↗
15. 15 Z. Li and C. Yu, J. Text. Inst., 106, 1261 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2014.98588910.1080/00405000.2014.985889 ↗
16. 16 F. M. Pelissari, P. J. A. Sobral and F. C. Menegalli, Cellulose, 21, 430 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0138-610.1007/s10570-013-0138-6 ↗
17. 17 M. A. Martins, E. M. Teixeira, A. C. Corrêa, M. Ferreira and L. H. C. Mattoso, J. Mater. Sci., 46, 7860 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5767-210.1007/s10853-011-5767-2 ↗
18. 18 M. M. Ibrahim, W. K. Zawawy and Y. Juttke, Cellulose, 20, 2416 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9992-510.1007/s10570-013-9992-5 ↗
19. 19 S. A. Ovalle-Serrano, C. Blanco-Tirado and M. Y. Combariza, Cellulose, 25, 7863 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1599-910.1007/s10570-017-1599-9 ↗
20. 20 B. H. McDonagh and G. Chinga-Carrasco, Polymers, 12, 2416 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1211253810.3390/polym12112538 ↗
21. 21 M. M. Kabir, H. Wang, K. T. Lau and F. Cardona, Appl. Surf. Sci., 276, 23 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.08610.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.086 ↗
22. 22 H. Celebi and A. Kurt, Carbohyd. Polym., 133, 293 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.00710.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.007 ↗
23. 23 F. Fan, M. Zhu, K. Fang, J. Xie, Z. Deng et al., Cellulose, 28, 8386 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04090-410.1007/s10570-021-04090-4 ↗