journal article·2025-12-15Open access

EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FLAX FIBER POLYPROPYLENE (FP) COMPOSITES USING THE ADAPTIVE NEURO FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, SHETTAHALLI MANTAIAH VINU KUMAR, RAVICHANDRAN ARUMUGAM THANGAVEL, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology-Avadi, Chennai- Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, RANGANATHAN SOUNDARARAJAN, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, CHANDRASEKARAN SASIKUMAR, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathyamangalam, Tamil Nadu, India, ERUSAGOUNDER SAKTHIVELMURUGAN, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathyamangalam, Tamil Nadu, India, CHINNASAMY NITHIYAPATHI, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 59· Issue 9-10

Abstract

Flax fiber reinforced polypropylene (FP) composites were prepared using the compression moulding technique and their dynamic mechanical (DM) properties were studied based on the fiber content. Fiber loading was varied from 0 to 50 vol% with increments of 10 vol% and the samples were designated accordingly as neat PP, FP10, FP20, FP30, FP40, and FP50 composites. The results showed that increased fiber content in the PP matrix improved the DM properties, such as storage modulus (E’), loss modulus (E”), and damping factor (Tanδ). Amongst the fabricated FP laminates, FP40 composites exhibited better viscoelastic performance. Furthermore, the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) was implemented to predict the DM properties, mainly, E’ and E” of the FP composites. The validation of the ANFIS model showed that experimental and predicted results were in good agreement to each other, confirming its reliability in forecasting the DM properties of flax fiber reinforced polypropylene (FP) composites. This study also investigated the thermal degradation behavior of the FP composites using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results showed that thermal stability of the neat PP improved from 432.69 °C to 463.90 °C for optimal fiber loading of 40 vol% flax fiber (FP40). Fractured samples of FP composites were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to comprehend the interfacial bonding mechanism of the FP composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 L. He, F. Xia, Y. Wang, J. Yuan, D. Chen et al., Polymers (Basel), 13, 4083 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1323408310.3390/polym13234083 ↗
2. 2 S. V. Kumar, K. S. Kumar, H. S. Jailani and G. Rajamurugan, Mater. Res. Express, 7, 085302 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abaea510.1088/2053-1591/abaea5 ↗
3. 3 V. K. Shettahalli Mantaiah, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 12415 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.206040410.1080/15440478.2022.2060404 ↗
4. 4 M. Bahrami, J. Abenojar and M. Á. Martínez, Materials, 13, 5145 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1322514510.3390/ma13225145 ↗
5. 5 S. N. A. Safri, M. T. H. Sultan, M. Jawaid and K. Jayakrishna, Compos. B Eng., 133, 112 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.008 ↗
6. 6 M. Rokbi, A. Khaldoune, M. Sanjay, P. Senthamaraikannan, A. Ati et al., Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf., 3, 144 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.09.00510.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.09.005 ↗
7. 7 V. K. Shettahalli Mantaiah, S. K. Kallippatti Lakshmanan and S. Kaliappagounder, J. Nat. Fibers, 19, 10367 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.199350410.1080/15440478.2021.1993504 ↗
8. 8 K. Ramraji, K. Rajkumar and P. Sabarinathan, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 234, 4505 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062209222510.1177/0954406220922257 ↗
9. 9 S. Bahlouli, A. Belaadi, A. Makhlouf, H. Alshahrani, M. K. Khan et al., Polymers, 15, 2910 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1513291010.3390/polym15132910 ↗
10. 10 M. Jawaid, H. A. Khalil and A. A. Bakar, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527, 7944 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.00510.1016/j.msea.2010.09.005 ↗
11. 11 E. Sakthivelmurugan, G. Senthil Kumar, S. Vinu Kumar and H. Singh, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 45, 400 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04339-y10.1007/s40430-023-04339-y ↗
12. 12 E. Sakthivelmurugan, G. Senthil Kumar and S. V. Kumar, Mater. Res., 26, e20230108 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2023-010810.1590/1980-5373-mr-2023-0108 ↗
13. 13 M. Jawaid, S. Awad, A. S. Ismail, M. Hashem, H. Fouad et al., J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 149, 10441 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13017-710.1007/s10973-024-13017-7 ↗
14. 14 M. B. Alshammari, A. Ahmad, M. Jawaid and S. A. Awad, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 25, 1642 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.03510.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.035 ↗
15. 15 M. Asim, M. Jawaid, M. T. Paridah, N. Saba, M. Nasir et al., Polym. Compos., 40, 3814 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2524010.1002/pc.25240 ↗
16. 16 S. Mohd Izwan, S. Sapuan, M. Zuhri and A. Mohamed, Polymers, 13, 2961 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1317296110.3390/polym13172961 ↗
17. 17 N. Saba, A. Safwan, M. Sanyang, F. Mohammad, M. Pervaiz et al., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 102, 822 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.07410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.074 ↗
18. 18 C. Sasikumar, E. Sakthivelmurugan and J. Rishi, Mater. Technol., 55, 851 (2021), https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2021.25610.17222/mit.2021.256 ↗
19. 19 S. Bose, D. Shome and C. Das, Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng., 6, 207 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2010.03433710.1504/IJISE.2010.034337 ↗
20. 20 S. M. V. Kumar, R. Jeyakumar, N. Manikandaprabu and C. Sasikumar, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 58, 833 (2024), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.7410.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.74 ↗
21. 21 S. M. Vinu Kumar, N. Manikandaprabu, N. Babu and C. Sasikumar, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 58, 101 (2024), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.1010.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.10 ↗
22. 22 P. Krishnasamy, G. Rajamurugan and M. Thirumurugan, J. Ind. Text., 51, 6884S (2022), https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372093557010.1177/1528083720935570 ↗
23. 23 T. Sathishkumar, J. Mater. Des. Appl., 230, 160 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420714552
24. 24 M. Gupta and R. Srivastava, Indian J. Fibre Text., 47, 64 (2017)10.1016/j.ijtb.2016.06.004 ↗
25. 25 S. V. Kumar and H. Singh, Indian J. Fibre Text., 48, 326 (2023), https://doi.org/10.56042/ijftr.v48i3.605710.56042/ijftr.v48i3.6057 ↗
26. 26 S. M. V. Kumar, J. Rengaraj and E. Sakthivelmurugan, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 58, 547 (2024), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.5110.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2024.58.51 ↗
27. "