KINETICS, EQUILIBRIUM AND THERMODYNAMICS OF CONGO RED REMOVAL BY CATIONIZED CELLULOSE OBTAINED FROM CEREAL BY-PRODUCTS
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study deals with the removal efficiency towards Congo red dye of two cationized cellulose adsorbents prepared from cereal by-products. Rice and einkorn husks were used as raw materials to extract and separate the cellulose by alkali and bleaching treatments. The cellulose materials were modified with N,N-dimethyl-1-octadecylamine to prepare cationized adsorbents. Instrumental methods, such as XRD, DTA, FTIR and SEM, as well as low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, were used for their characterization. The results showed that the quaternary ammonium group was successfully grafted onto the cellulose structures. The survey mainly focused on the effect of process parameters on the adsorption capacity of the investigated materials, including contact time, initial Congo red concentrations, solution pH and temperature. The adsorption process was well described by the pseudo-second-order and Langmuir models. The values of entropy, enthalpy and Gibbs free energy for the Congo red removal were determined.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. "1 A. Bożęcka, M. Orlof-Naturalna and M. Kopeć, J. Ecol. Eng., 22, 111 (2021), https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/14136810.12911/22998993/141368 ↗
2. 2 V. Katheresan, J. Kansedo and S. Lau, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6, 4676 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.06010.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060 ↗
3. 3 Y. Zhou, L. Ge and N. Fan, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 36, 1310 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1177/026361741876894510.1177/0263617418768945 ↗
4. 4 T. Taher, D. Rohendi, R. Mohadi and A. Lesbani, Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci., Univ. Bahrain, 26, 125 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2019.157627410.1080/25765299.2019.1576274 ↗
5. 5 M. Sulyman, J. Namiesnik and A. Gierak, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 26, 479 (2017), https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/6676910.15244/pjoes/66769 ↗
6. 6 Z. Jiang and D. Hu, J. Mol. Liq., 276, 105 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.15310.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.153 ↗
7. 7 S. Uzunova, L. Minchev, I. Uzunov and V. Toteva, Chem. Ecol., 32, 976 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2016.121285010.1080/02757540.2016.1212850 ↗
8. 8 K. Asemave, L. Thaddeus and P. Tarhemba, Sustain. Chem., 2, 271 (2021), https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem202001610.3390/suschem2020016 ↗
9. 9 P. Vassileva, T. Radoykova, A. Detcheva, I. Avramova, K. Aleksieva et al., Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 13, 1319 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-0970-y10.1007/s13762-016-0970-y ↗
10. 10 G. Gentscheva, I. Uzunov, I. Karadjova and A. Predoeva, CR Acad. Bulg. Sci., 67, 647 (2014)
11. 11 Z. Shamsollahi and A. Partovinia, J. Environ. Manag., 246, 314 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.14510.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.145 ↗
12. 12 S. Hokkanen, A. Bhatnagar and M. Sillanpää, Water Res., 91, 156 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.00810.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008 ↗
13. 13 V. Munagapati and D.-S. Kim, J. Mol. Liq., 220, 540 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.11910.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.119 ↗
14. 14 A. Aly, S. Mahmoud and M. El-Apasery, Pigment. Resin. Technol., 47, 108 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1108/PRT-10-2016-009210.1108/PRT-10-2016-0092 ↗
15. 15 A. Malik, A. Khan, N. Anwar and M. Naeem, Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop., 34, 41 (2020), https://doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v34i1.410.4314/bcse.v34i1.4 ↗
16. 16 K. Litefti, M. Freire, M. Stitou and J. González-Álvarez, Sci. Rep., 9, 16530 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 019-53046-z10.1038/s41598-019-53046-z ↗
17. 17 N. Mondal and S. Kar, Appl. Water Sci., 8, 157 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0811-x10.1007/s13201-018-0811-x ↗
18. 18 R. Lafi, I. Montasser and A. Hafiane, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 37, 160 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1177/026361741881922710.1177/0263617418819227 ↗
19. 19 H. Yang, R. Yan, H. Chen, D. Lee and C. Zheng, Fuel, 86, 1781 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.01310.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 ↗
20. 20 P. Aggarwal, D. Dollimore and K. Heon, J. Therm. Anal., 50, 7 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0197954510.1007/BF01979545 ↗
21. 21 S. Vicini, E. Princi, G. Luciano, E. Franceschi, E. Pedemonte et al., Thermochim. Acta, 418, 123 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2003.11.04910.1016/j.tca.2003.11.049 ↗
22. 22 Y. Lin, J. Cho and G. Tompsett, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 20097 (2009), https://doi.org/1021/jp906702p10.1021/jp906702p ↗
23. 23 S. Wang, B. Ru, H. Lin and Z. Luo, Bioresour. Technol., 143, 378 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.02610.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.026 ↗
24. 24 H. Kawamoto, J. Wood Sci., 63, 1 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-016-1606-z10.1007/s10086-016-1606-z ↗
25. 25 P. Patwardhan, R. Brown and B. Shanks, ChemSusChem, 4, 1629 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20110013310.1002/cssc.201100133 ↗
26. 26 P. Vassileva, A. Detcheva, S. Uzunova, I. Uzunov and D. Voykova, Separ. Sci. Technol., 51, 797 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2015.113633110.1080/01496395.2015.1136331 ↗
27. 27 D. Radev, I. Uzunov, B. Kunev, V. Tumbalev and P. Tsokov, AIP Conf. Proc., 9, 68 (2009)
28. 28 K. Das, D. Ray, N. Bandyopadhyay and S. Sengupta, J. Polym. Environ., 18, 355 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0167-210.1007/s10924-010-0167-2 ↗
29. 29 M. Poletto, H. Ornaghi Júnior and A. Zattera, Materials, 7, 6105 (2014), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma709610510.3390/ma7096105 ↗
30. 30 S. Keshk and M. Hamdy, Turk. J. Chem., 43, 94 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-1803-8310.3906/kim-1803-83 ↗
31. 31 W. Nakbanpote, B. Goodman and P. Thiravetyan, Colloid. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 304, 7 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.04.01310.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.04.013 ↗
32. 32 M. Morcali, B. Zeytuncu and O. Yucel, Mater. Res., 16, 528 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-1439201300500000610.1590/S1516-14392013005000006 ↗
33. 33 H. Yang, R. Yan, H. Chen, D. H. Lee and C. Zheng, Fuel, 86, 1781 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.01310.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 ↗
34. 34 A. Bartošová, L. Blinová, M. Sirotiak and A. Michalíková, Res. Pap., Fac. Mat. Sci. Technol., Slovak Univ. Technol. Bratisl., 25, 103 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1515/rput-2017-001210.1515/rput-2017-0012 ↗
35. 35 L. Ge, Y. Zhou, N. Fan, M. S. Xia, L. Q. Dai et al., Desalin. Water Treat., 81, 291 (2017), https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.2105910.5004/dwt.2017.21059 ↗
36. 36 P. Vassileva, D. Voykova, I. Uzunov and S. Uzunova, CR Acad. Bulg. Sci., 71, 1192 (2018), https://doi.org/10.7546/CRABS.2018.09.0510.7546/CRABS.2018.09.05 ↗
37. 37 P. Vassileva and D. Voikova, J. Hazard. Mater., 170, 948 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.06210.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.062 ↗
38. 38 Ü. Geçgel and H. Kolancıla, Nat. Prod. Res., 26, 659 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2010.54187810.1080/14786419.2010.541878 ↗
39. 39 S. Mohebali, D. Bastani and H. Shayesteh, J. Mol. Struct., 1176, 181 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.08.06810.1016/j.molstruc.2018.08.068 ↗
40. 40 B. Ertan, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 1131 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.9710.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.97 ↗
41. 41 N. El Messaoudi, A. Dbik, M. El Khomri, A. Sabour, S. Bentahar et al., Int. J. Phytoremediat., 19, 1047 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.131933110.1080/15226514.2017.1319331 ↗
42. 42 E. Dovi, A. Aryee, A. Kani, F. M. Mpatani, J. Li et al., J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9, 106301 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.10630110.1016/j.jece.2021.106301 ↗
43. "