journal article·2022-09-28Open access

RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY FOR OPTIMIZATION OF PERACETIC ACID PRETREATMENT OF PULP TO REDUCE POLLUTANTS FROM BLEACHING EFFLUENT

", NIRMAL SHARMA, Avantha Centre for Industrial Research and Development, Thapar Technology Campus, Bhadson Road, Patiala – 147 004 (Punjab), India ", NISHI KANT BHARDWAJ, "Avantha Centre for Industrial Research and Development, Thapar Technology Campus, Bhadson Road, Patiala – 147 004 (Punjab), India ", RAM BHUSHAN PRASHAD SINGH, Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun – 248007 (Uttarakhand), India

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology· Volume 56· Issue 7-8

Abstract

Pulp bleaching processes emit many toxic substances. Peracetic acid (PAA) has been long recognized as an efficient bleaching agent for cellulose pulps. In the present study, 20 runs were conducted using response surface methodology (RSM) through central composite design for optimization of peracetic acid treatment of hardwood pulp, as a pretreatment step before applying conventional bleaching. Three factors, namely temperature (50-80 °C), time (0.5-2.0 h) and PAA dose (0.5-2.0%), were investigated to find out their impact on the kappa number, yield, brightness and viscosity of the pulp. The findings revealed that the peracetic acid dose of 1.0% at 80 °C for 1.0 h was the most suitable to obtain pulp of kappa number 10.2, yield of 96.87%, brightness of 43.6% ISO and viscosity of 11.7 cP. FTIR analysis revealed that the peracetic acid pretreatment of the pulp led to lower lignin content, compared to untreated pulp, but also reduced the bleaching effluent parameters, such as BOD, COD, TDS, color and AOX, by 43.0%, 55.7%, 31.9%, 51.4% and 51.1%, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lignin and Wood Chemistry · Botanical Research and Applications · Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. "1 S. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Hospido, M. T. Moreira, J. Romero and G. Feijoo, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 1010 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.01710.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.017 ↗
2. 2 A. Bhatnagar, RJC, 8, 143 (2015)10.1016/j.neucom.2015.01.025 ↗
3. 3 D. V. Savant, R. Abdul Rahman and D. R. Ranade, Bioresour. Technol., 97, 1092 (2006), https://doi.10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.01310.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.013 ↗
4. 4 C. S. R. Freire, A. J. D. Silvestre and C. P. Neto, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 811 (2003), https://doi.10.1021/ES020084710.1021/es0200847 ↗
5. 5 C. Y. Teh, P. M. Budiman, K. P. Y. Shak and T. Y. Wu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55, 4363 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0470310.1021/acs.iecr.5b04703 ↗
6. 6 AET Reports (2013): Alliance for Environmental Technology. Trends in World Bleached Chemical Pulp Production: 1990-2012, IOP Publishing Physics Web, http://aet.org/science_of_ecf/eco_risk/2013_pulp.html (accessed on 15 August, 2019)
7. 7 A. K. Sangha, L. Petridis, J. C. Smith, A. Ziebell and J. M. Parks, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energ., 31, 47 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.1062810.1002/ep.10628 ↗
8. 8 S. X. Nie, S. Q. Yao, C. R. Qin, K. C. Li, X. L. Liu et al., BioResources, 9, 5604 (2014)
9. 9 S. Tripathi, N. Sharma and I. Alam, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 16, 4327 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1887-410.1007/s13762-018-1887-4 ↗
10. 10 D. Kaur, N. K. Bhardwaj and R. K. Lohchab, J. Clean. Prod., 170, 174 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.11110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.111 ↗
11. 11 N. Sharma, N. K. Bhardwaj and R. B. P. Singh, J. Clean. Prod., 256, 120338 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12033810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120338 ↗
12. 12 W. S. Hickman, Rev. Prog. Color. Relat. Top., 32, 13 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2002.tb00247.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.2002.tb00247.x ↗
13. 13 P. Bajpai, "Environmentally Benign Approaches for Pulp Bleaching", 2nd ed., Elsevier, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59421-1.00006-510.1016/B978-0-444-59421-1.00006-5 ↗
14. 14 D. Danielewicz and B. S. Slusarska, Fibre Text. East. Eur., 14, 95 (2006)
15. 15 D. Danielewicz and B. S. Slusarska, Fibre Text. East. Eur., 15, 95 (2007)
16. 16 G. Paschoal, C. M. Muller, G. M. Carvalho, C. A. Tischer and S. Mali, Quim. Nova, 38, 478 (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.2015002910.5935/0100-4042.20150029 ↗
17. 17 P. Nascimentoa, R. Marim, G. Carvalho and S. Mali, Mater. Res., 19, 167 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-042310.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-0423 ↗
18. 18 P. Bajpai, "Biermann's Handbook of Pulp and Paper", vol. 2. Paper and Board Making, Elsevier, 201810.1016/B978-0-12-814238-7.00008-8 ↗
19. 19 I. H. Aljundi, Desalination, 277, 24 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.09010.1016/j.desal.2011.03.090 ↗
20. 20 I. Trawczynska and M. Wojcik, Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 29, 72, (2015), https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2014.93498610.1080/13102818.2014.934986 ↗
21. 21 Y. Pei, S. Wang, C. Qin, J. Su, S. Nie et al., BioResources, 11, 696 (2016), https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.1.696-71210.15376/biores.11.1.696-712 ↗
22. 22 M. Mamaye, Z. Kiflie and S. A. Feleke, J. Nat. Fibers, 21, 1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.176444710.1080/15440478.2020.1764447 ↗
23. 23 P. Kumar, N. K. Bhardwaj and S. Kumar, IPPTA J., 29, 68 (2017)10.1177/1742271X17705028 ↗
24. 24 X. Zhao, E. Vander Heide, T. Zhang and D. Liu, J. Wood Chem. Technol., 31, 1 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1080/0277381100363749410.1080/02773811003637494 ↗
25. 25 J. Gierer, Wood Sci. Technol., 20, 1 (1986), https://eurekamag.com/research/015/265/015265182
26. 26 R. Ma, M. Guo and X. Zhang, ChemSusChem, 7, 412 (2014), https://doi.org/10.002/csscc.20130096410.1002/cssc.201300964 ↗
27. 27 S. Y. Park, S. M. Cho, J. C. Kim, C. Hong, S. H. Kim et al., BioResources, 14, 4413 (2019)10.15376/biores.14.2.4413-4429 ↗
28. 28 V. Barbash, V. Poyda and I. Deykun, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 45, 613 (2011), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT45,9-10(2011)/p.613-618.pdf
29. 29 A. A. M. A. Nada, A. A. Ibrahem, Y. Fahmy and H. E. Abou-Yousef, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 36, 123 (2002), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/onlinearticles.php
30. 30 Z. Yuan, Y. Ni and A. R. P. Van Heiningen, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 75, 37 (1997)10.1002/cjce.5450750108 ↗
31. 31 N. L. Owen and D. W. Thomas, Appl. Spectrosc., 43, 451 (1989), https://opg.optica.org/as/abstract.cfm?URI=as-43-3-45110.1366/0003702894202760 ↗
32. 32 X. Colom, F. Carrillo, F. Nogues and P. Garriga, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 3, 543 (2003)10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00051-X ↗
33. 33 K. K. Pandey, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 71, 969 (1999), https://doi.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990321)71:12<1969::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990321)71:12<1969::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
34. 34 S. Bhardwaj, N. K, Bhardwaj and Y. S. Negi, APPITA J., 70, 139 (2017), https://doi.10.3316/informit.984620543956998
35. 35 H. R. Lee, R. J. Kazlauskas and T. H. Park, Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng., 22, 405 (2017), https://doi.10.1007/s12257-017-0139-710.1007/s12257-017-0139-7 ↗
36. 36 D. P. Barros, V. L. Silva, H. Hamalainen and J. L. Colodette, BioResources, 5, 881 (2010), https://doi.10.15376/biores.5.2.881-898
37. 37 J. Fiskari, M. Savela, K. Ruuttunen, V. Ali-Rekola, P. Kilpelainen et al., Cellulose Chem. Technol., 48, 713 (2014), https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT7-8(2014)/p.713-716.pdf
38. 38 P. Krizman, F. Kovac and P. F. Tavcer, Color. Technol., 121 304 (2005)
39. 39 Q. Haider, D. Kumar and C. Sharma, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 55, 809 (2021), https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.6810.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2021.55.68 ↗
40. 40 N. Sharma, N. K. Bhardwaj and R. B. P. Singh, in Procs. International Conference: Climate Changes towards Health and Agricultural Sustainability, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, India, 2019
41. 41 D. Kaur, N. K. Bhardwaj and R. K. Lohchab, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 24, 23488 (2017), https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-017-9965-610.1007/s11356-017-9965-6 ↗
42. 42 E. I. Ferro, K. Ruuttunen, J. Perrin and T. Vuorinen, Ind. Crop. Prod., 172, 114004 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11400410.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114004 ↗
43. 43 P. Axegard, Chemosphere, 236, 124386 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12438610.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124386 ↗
44. "