journal article·2020-01-01

Optimization of Vat Dyeing with an Orange Peel Extract Reducing Agent using Response Surface Methodology

Mohammad Tajul Islam, Nur-Us-Shafa Mazumder, Syed Asaduzzaman

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 7· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Sodium dithionite is the most commonly-used reducing agent for vat dyeing of cotton fabric. This research focuses on the use of orange peel extract (OPE) as a new reducing agent for vat dyeing cotton fabric to avoid the toxic chemicals released from sodium dithionite. The dyeing experiments were carried out in a batch system to optimize alkali concentration, OPE concentration, and vatting temperature via response surface methodology (RSM). The optimal color yield was achieved at 11.97 g/L of OPE, 1.18 g/L of alkali, and 44 °C vatting temperature. Fabric dyed under optimized dyeing condition using OPE was compared with a standard conventionally dyed fabric using sodium dithionite as the reducing agent. A uniformly dyed fabric with comparable color yield was obtained. Fastness properties were not affected by the use of OPE.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · melanin and skin pigmentation · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology

Port City International University

Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2007.00082.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.2007.00082.x ↗
2. Broadbent A. D. · 2001
3. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.05.04110.1016/j.dyepig.2006.05.041 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0143-7208(03)00108-610.1016/S0143-7208(03)00108-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.01.00510.1016/j.dyepig.2004.01.005 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2001.tb00340.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.2001.tb00340.x ↗
7. Ben Ticha M. · International Journal of Environmental Research · 2013 · 7 · 697
8. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.06210.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.062 ↗
9. Santhi P. · Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research · 2010 · 35 · 349
10. Duda-Chodak A. · Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment · 2007 · 6 · 29
11. 10.1007/s12221-013-2027-x10.1007/s12221-013-2027-x ↗
12. 10.3746/pnf.2014.19.4.29110.3746/pnf.2014.19.4.291 ↗
13. Carley K. M., Reminga N. Y. K. J. Response Surface Methodology; CMU-ISRI-04-136 School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, October 2004, 2004; pp 1–36.
14. 10.1080/00401706.1960.1048991210.1080/00401706.1960.10489912 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1478-4408.1992.tb01405.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.1992.tb01405.x ↗
16. ISO 105-C06:2010, Textiles-Tests for colour fastness-Part C06, International Organization for Standardization, Basel, Switzerland, 2010, pp 1–9.
17. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
18. ASTM D3786-01, Standard Test Method for Hydraulic Bursting Strength of Textile Fabrics-Diaphragm Bursting Strength Tester Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, 2001.
19. 10.1177/152808371666725710.1177/1528083716667257 ↗
20. Adeel S. · Journal of Natural Fibers · 2017 · 15 · 1
21. Chakraborty J. N. Fundamentals and Practices in Colouration of Textiles; Woodhead Publishing: New Delhi, India, 2014; pp 88–108.10.1201/b18243 ↗
22. 10.1533/9780857093974.1.15010.1533/9780857093974.1.150 ↗
23. Francis R. L. · 1995