journal article·2020-05

Comparative analysis of the properties: Microcrystalline cellulose fiber polyamide composites filled with ethylene copolymer and olefin elastomer

MDH Beg, Muhammad Remanul Islam, AA Mamun, H-P Heim, M Feldmann

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 28· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Polyamide 6.10 (PA) composites, reinforced with microcrystalline cellulose fibers, were prepared separately using two types of coupling agents, Exxelor VA1803 (VA) and Bondyram 7103 (BR), using extrusion followed by an injection molding process. The fiber loading was fixed to 30 wt%, whereas the coupling agent was fixed to 5 wt%. The properties of the composites were characterized by the tensile properties, impact testing, differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic thermomechanical, thermogravimetric, and X-ray diffraction analyses. The distribution of the fibers into the PA was examined by a scanning electron microscope. It was found that the VA improved the mechanical and thermomechanical properties slightly compared to BR-based samples. Overall, the structural, morphological, and thermal properties of the composites were also improved comparatively using VA.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Gambang, Malaysia

Malaysian Institute of Chemical and Bioengineering Technology, University of Kuala Lumpur, Alor Gajah, Malaysia

Institute of Materials Engineering, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany

Funding

Hessen State Ministry of Higher Education

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5RA04149J10.1039/C5RA04149J ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.01310.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.013 ↗
3. 10.1002/app.3045710.1002/app.30457 ↗
4. Mohanty AK · Macromol Mater Eng · 2000 · 1 · 276
5. Taj S · Proc Pak Acad Sci · 2007 · 44 · 129
6. 10.1021/bm049368510.1021/bm0493685 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2040010.1002/pc.20400 ↗
8. Jacobson R
9. 10.1080/03602559.2015.101021910.1080/03602559.2015.1010219 ↗
10. Islam MR · J Appl Polym Sci · 2015 · 133 · 978
11. 10.1007/s10570-014-0207-510.1007/s10570-014-0207-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00161-610.1016/S0040-6031(99)00161-6 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0226081210.1007/BF02260812 ↗
15. 10.1023/A:101067770458610.1023/A:1010677704586 ↗
16. Panaitescu DM · J Optoelectron Adv Mater · 2007 · 9 · 2524
17. Beg MDH · Adv Polym Technol · 2018 · 2018 · 1
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.09410.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.094 ↗
19. 10.1177/089270571246151110.1177/0892705712461511 ↗
20. 10.1002/1521-3927(20011101)22:17<1438::AID-MARC1438>3.0.CO;2-U10.1002/1521-3927(20011101)22:17<1438::AID-MARC1438>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
21. 10.1002/pen.2433510.1002/pen.24335 ↗
22. 10.15376/biores.8.3.3753-377010.15376/biores.8.3.3753-3770 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10973-005-0782-710.1007/s10973-005-0782-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tca.2006.09.01310.1016/j.tca.2006.09.013 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.2177910.1002/app.21779 ↗