Mechanical Behaviour of Sorghum Stalk Rind Reinforced Maleic Anhydride Grafted Polyethylene under Different Environmental Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
This work investigates the mechanical and service behaviour of high-density polyethylene composites reinforced by sorghum stalk rind (SSR) at various concentrations of fibres and maleic anhydride treated polyethylene (MAPE). Fibre length l and aspect ratio l/w distributions of compounded fibre composites show large numbers of smaller particles. Tensile and bending properties were investigated, taking the effects of some service conditions into consideration, such as water absorption and UV exposure. Untreated polyethylene reinforced with 40 wt.% SSR showed a maximum water uptake of 6.9 wt.%. Generally, reductions in strength and modulus were observed upon immersion in water. In contrast, UV radiation did not show any significant effect on mechanical properties at exposure times of up to 300 h.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Egypt
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.asej.2012.08.00110.1016/j.asej.2012.08.001 ↗
2. 10.1002/978047016593510.1002/9780470165935 ↗
3. ChaiC. Natural Fibre Composites Market Trend 2011–2016: Trend, Forecast and Opportunity Analysis, http://www.azom.com/news.aspx?newsID=30907 (2011, accessed 16 July 2013).
4. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Final 2012 Data and Preliminary 2013 Data for 5 major commodity aggregates, http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx (2011, accessed 4 April 2011).
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.015 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.008 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10853-008-2495-310.1007/s10853-008-2495-3 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.022 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.016 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.10.02210.1016/j.enconman.2008.10.022 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.012 ↗
12. 10.1177/002199831038908910.1177/0021998310389089 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.003 ↗
14. Taha I. · 2007 · 1 · 52
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.020 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.019 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.027 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00161-910.1016/S0266-3538(97)00161-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00056-710.1016/S0266-3538(00)00056-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.02710.1016/j.msea.2009.04.027 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.08.00310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.08.003 ↗