Observations of fatigue damage development in woven glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite using transmission light photography technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Fatigue behaviour is an important aspect for consideration while handling glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites. A combination of (0°/90°) and (±45°) plies are gaining practical interest in engineering applications due to their excellent mechanical properties. Properties of individual above-stated plies primarily influence the behaviour of laminates. Fatigue behaviour of on-axis (0°/90°) and off-axis (±45°) fiber orientated woven GFRP laminates was investigated. Tensile and tension-tension fatigue tests were performed on the prepared test coupons according to the ASTM standard. Fatigue test was conducted until failure at maximum applied stress of 90%, 70%, and 50% of the respective ultimate strength. Damage growth was monitored in the term of debond zones by employing the transmission light photography technique. Testing process was recorded by using a digital camera. The results were established in terms of the stress-strain curve, Wöhler curve, debond zones and dynamic stiffness. The fatigue strength of off-axis laminates was much lower than the on-axis laminates. Global damage has occurred in (0°/90°) laminates while (±45°) laminate witnessed localized damage. At higher stress levels, samples were failed at shorter lifespan with aggressive damage; however, on-axis specimens survived with longer fatigue life.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, India
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2417710.1002/pc.24177 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.06810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.068 ↗
3. 10.3390/polym1110166710.3390/polym11101667 ↗
4. 10.1177/073168441875471310.1177/0731684418754713 ↗
5. 10.1177/09673911160240080610.1177/096739111602400806 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12221-019-8468-010.1007/s12221-019-8468-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/0950-0618(95)00073-910.1016/0950-0618(95)00073-9 ↗
8. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.488-489.23010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.488-489.230 ↗
9. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00053-710.1016/S1359-835X(01)00053-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.015 ↗
11. 10.1088/2053-1591/aab33210.1088/2053-1591/aab332 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.031 ↗
13. 10.1177/096739111879826610.1177/0967391118798266 ↗
14. 10.1177/096739112199128910.1177/0967391121991289 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00084-310.1016/S0263-8223(02)00084-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.78010.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.780 ↗
17. 10.1533/9781845696818.16410.1533/9781845696818.164 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.015 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.011 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00041-010.1016/S0263-8223(99)00041-0 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-1-4020-9372-2_210.1007/978-1-4020-9372-2_2 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00125-710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00125-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.009 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.029 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199830936094310.1177/0021998309360943 ↗
26. 10.1520/D3171-1510.1520/D3171-15 ↗
27. 10.1520/D3039_D3039M-0810.1520/D3039_D3039M-08 ↗
28. 10.1520/D3479_D3479M-1910.1520/D3479_D3479M-19 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.069 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.012 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.004 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.003 ↗
33. 10.1177/146442071878089010.1177/1464420718780890 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.020 ↗