journal article·2021-06

Effect of modified microcrystalline cellulose on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) molecular dynamics by proton relaxometry

Filipe Antonio dos Santos Viegas Ribeiro, Maxwell de Paula Cavalcante, Maria Inês Bruno Tavares, Amanda Ramos Aragão Melo

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 29· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Hybrid films of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and modified cellulose by solution casting method were prepared, aiming to study the influence of modified cellulose (0.25%, 0.5% and 0.75% w/w) on the structural organization and thermal properties of PHB matrix. The modified cellulose showed good dispersion in polymer matrix, due to the high compatibility between phases explained by similarity of polymer and filler structures. The composites were studied by wide-angle X-ray diffractometry, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, and time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The conjugation of results coming from those techniques allowed to determine the cellulose concentration that had the highest influence on crystalline planes and degree of crystallinity of PHB, that is, the influence in the composite structure. The molecular dynamics obtained by NMR showed a reciprocal influence between polymer matrix and cellulose particles, enhancing the interactions present in the agglomerated particles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Instituto de Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.03.01910.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.03.019 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cap.2010.07.01610.1016/j.cap.2010.07.016 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.06.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.06.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.01310.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.013 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00396-012-2784-x10.1007/s00396-012-2784-x ↗
6. 10.1002/app.3781110.1002/app.37811 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.04810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.048 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00142-810.1016/S0142-9418(01)00142-8 ↗
9. 10.1590/S1516-1439200800040001810.1590/S1516-14392008000400018 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.03310.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.033 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1002-0071(12)60086-010.1016/S1002-0071(12)60086-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.023 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.04410.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.044 ↗
14. Pereira FV · Quím Nova · 2014 · 37 · 120910.1590/S0100-40422014000100022 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.04810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.048 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.046 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-013-0007-310.1007/s10570-013-0007-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.00710.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.01210.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.012 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.04710.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.047 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.00410.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.01210.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.012 ↗
23. 10.1107/S002188987300833210.1107/S0021889873008332 ↗
24. 10.1038/srep1788410.1038/srep17884 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.024 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00265-810.1016/S0141-3910(01)00265-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.09.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.09.007 ↗
28. 10.1002/pi.515010.1002/pi.5150 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.011 ↗
30. 10.1002/masy.20075121210.1002/masy.200751212 ↗
31. 10.1590/0104-1428.165310.1590/0104-1428.1653 ↗
32. 10.1590/0104-1428.209310.1590/0104-1428.2093 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.02810.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.028 ↗