journal article·2021-11

Surface properties of chitosan/montmorillonite films for biomedical applications

Shih-Hang Chang, Ming-Han Hsieh

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 29· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we firstly investigated the surface and protein adsorption properties of montmorillonite (MMT)/chitosan (CS) composite films with various MMT/CS weight ratios for metallic implants coating applications. Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay results show that the neat CS film exhibits a high concentration of bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein adhesion because the abundant carbonyl and amide functional groups on the surface of the CS film easily form hydrogen bonds with the copious carboxylic acid groups on the surface of the BSA protein. The MMT/CS composite films with MMT/CS = 3, 5, 8, and 10 possess a much lower BSA adhesion concentration than that of the neat CS film, as some of the carbonyl and amide functional groups on the surface of the composite films are replaced by the –Si–O–Si and –Al–O–Al groups. Among these MMT/CS composite films, the film with MMT/CS = 5 exhibits the lowest BSA adsorption concentration because it possesses a higher MMT content than those with MMT/CS = 1 and 3 and a smoother and non-porous surface than those with MMT/CS = 8 and 10. According to our results, MMT/CS composite films with appropriate MMT/CS weight ratios exhibit better surface and protein adsorption properties than neat CS for biomedical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National I-Lan University, Yilan City, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jbm.82028050810.1002/jbm.820280508 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.05210.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.052 ↗
3. 10.1002/jab.77006040310.1002/jab.770060403 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00027-210.1016/S0142-9612(00)00027-2 ↗
5. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199805)40:2<324::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199805)40:2<324::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.06.02110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.06.021 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.14010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.140 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.02610.1016/j.msec.2018.12.026 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0008-6215(03)00038-710.1016/S0008-6215(03)00038-7 ↗
10. 10.1021/cm034304710.1021/cm0343047 ↗
11. 10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/03412210.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034122 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.03.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.03.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.004 ↗
14. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.512-515.174610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.512-515.1746 ↗
15. 10.1134/S0965545X1702004310.1134/S0965545X17020043 ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa9ba410.1088/1361-6528/aa9ba4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12232210.1016/j.cej.2019.122322 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.05.05510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.05.055 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2012.07.00810.1016/j.pnsc.2012.07.008 ↗
20. 10.1088/1748-605X/ab1a0410.1088/1748-605X/ab1a04 ↗
21. 10.2147/IJN.S16230610.2147/IJN.S162306 ↗
22. 10.3390/jfb903005210.3390/jfb9030052 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.10.06010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.10.060 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.05510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.055 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.12110.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.121 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.04410.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.044 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.10.03110.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.10.031 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853-018-2758-610.1007/s10853-018-2758-6 ↗