journal article·2007-09

A Study of the Mechanics of Porous Plga 85/15 Scaffold in Compression

Linus Leung, Josee Perron, Hani E. Naguib

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 15· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Constitutive modelling of the stress-strain relationship of open-celled PLGA 85/15 bioscaffolds under compression was studied. A constitutive model for compressive behaviour was directly derived from the morphology of a unit cubic cell. These constitutive equations describe the stress-strain relationship as a function of the foam's material properties and cell morphology, such as elastic modulus, yield stress, relative density, cell strut thickness, and cell size. To verify this model, uniaxial compression testing was performed on scaffold samples. Using the gas foaming/salt leaching method, the samples were prepared by using different foaming parameters such as salt/ polymer mass ratio, saturation pressure, and saturation time. The comparisons of theoretical and experimental data demonstrate that the constitutive model using a cubic unit cell accurately describes the behaviour of PLGA foams with low relative densities under compression.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Smart and Adaptive Polymers Lab, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.289122810.1115/1.2891228 ↗
2. 10.1038/nm0796-82410.1038/nm0796-824 ↗
3. 10.1006/excr.1999.459510.1006/excr.1999.4595 ↗
4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199808)41:2<322::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199808)41:2<322::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
5. 10.1002/1097-4636(20010915)56:4<469::AID-JBM1118>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/1097-4636(20010915)56:4<469::AID-JBM1118>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.a.1042010.1002/jbm.a.10420 ↗
7. 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<376::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<376::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
8. 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00733-410.1016/0003-4975(95)00733-4 ↗
9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<347::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<347::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
10. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90049-810.1016/0142-9612(93)90049-8 ↗
12. 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90953-910.1016/0032-3861(94)90953-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0928-4931(01)00338-110.1016/S0928-4931(01)00338-1 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.06610.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.066 ↗
15. 10.1002/cm.1003410.1002/cm.10034 ↗
16. 10.1089/ten.1998.4.28110.1089/ten.1998.4.281 ↗
17. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199824)43:4<374::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199824)43:4<374::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
18. 10.1089/1076327036069701210.1089/10763270360697012 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.018 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00138-810.1016/S0168-3659(99)00138-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/0142-9612(92)90187-S10.1016/0142-9612(92)90187-S ↗
22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<396::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<396::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
23. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)87284-X10.1016/0142-9612(96)87284-X ↗
24. 10.1115/1.154624210.1115/1.1546242 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00117-910.1016/S0266-3538(03)00117-9 ↗
26. GibsonL. J., and AshbyM. F. “Cellular solids: Structure and properties,” Second Edition, Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge, (1999), 175–234.
27. Perron J. · “Parametric study to optimize the processing parameters and the physical properties of porous PLGA 85/15 scaffold,” · 2006
28. WempnerG, “Mechanics of Solids,” PWS Publishing Co., Boston, (1995), 589–595.