journal article·2023-11Open access

Mechanical properties of starch bio-composite and molded pulp samples manufactured using pine and eucalyptus fibers

Artunç Alptekin, Hasan Çallioğlu

Abstract

In recent years, one of the main challenges is to improve the mechanical performance of bio-composites to be used as structural parts for the construction, automotive, and aviation sector. This paper may contribute to developing durable structural bio-composite parts with starch addition. The mechanical properties of bio-composites reinforced by eucalyptus or pine fibers (48 wt %) compound with Cationic Starch (48 wt %) and Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (4 wt %) were determined. The production method was a combination of molded pulp, extrusion, and compression molding production techniques. To see the effect of adding starch to bio-composites and different production methods, the mechanical performance of these natural fibers produced by the conventional molded pulp production method (without any additives) was also found and compared with the composite samples. Composite samples indicate significantly better tensile, flexural, and compressive values, at least four times, compared with the molded pulp samples. On the other hand, the molded pulp samples had more than 2 times better impact characteristics against composites. Using molded pulp technic in composite production (investigated in the study) is a new idea and may give some opportunities with its serial production compatibility and geometry freeness, to the industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.10110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.001 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2641310.1002/pc.26413 ↗
4. 10.1002/mame.20140008910.1002/mame.201400089 ↗
5. 10.1080/15583724.2014.97112410.1080/15583724.2014.971124 ↗
6. 10.1177/073168441349829610.1177/0731684413498296 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.05810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.058 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.020 ↗
10. European Bioplastics · 2022
11. 10.1177/0967391122108759510.1177/09673911221087595 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00301-710.1016/S0032-3861(97)00301-7 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00314-310.1016/S0144-8617(00)00314-3 ↗
14. 10.1002/9780470391501.ch110.1002/9780470391501.ch1 ↗
15. Arvanitoyannis IS · 2009 · 19
16. Huber KC · 2010 · 145
17. Ueda S, Higaki S, Sudo M, et al. Molding compound for articles including a cellulose fiber and a method for molding the same. Patent CA 2260410, Canada. 1999.
18. 10.4325/seikeikakou.22.64510.4325/seikeikakou.22.645 ↗
19. 10.4325/seikeikakou.24.71210.4325/seikeikakou.24.712 ↗
20. 10.4325/seikeikakou.29.47010.4325/seikeikakou.29.470 ↗
21. 10.1002/app.2674010.1002/app.26740 ↗
22. 10.1088/1742-6596/1527/1/01204210.1088/1742-6596/1527/1/012042 ↗
23. Glenn GM · 2009 · 113
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.014 ↗
25. Campinhos EN · N For · 1999 · 17 · 129
26. 10.1590/1806-9088201900040001110.1590/1806-90882019000400011 ↗
27. Wattanakornsiri A · Songklanakarin J Sci Technol · 2011 · 33 · 461
28. 10.1007/s10853-017-1683-410.1007/s10853-017-1683-4 ↗
29. 10.1177/0967391121100937210.1177/09673911211009372 ↗
30. 10.1177/073168441244799210.1177/0731684412447992 ↗
31. 10.1177/073168441562659410.1177/0731684415626594 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0926-6690(03)00079-710.1016/S0926-6690(03)00079-7 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.05.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2006.05.003 ↗