journal article·2014-07

Mechanical Properties and Tribological Behaviour of Retrieved Uhmwpe Tibial Insert in Total Knee Replacement after Implantation 30 Months

Xueqin Kang, Shirong Ge, Xiaofeng Dai

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 22· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the performance changing of an ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tibial insert, which was removed from a 56 years old male patient after 30 months of service. The tibial insert was investigated by using a contact angle goniometer, UMT-2 friction tester and MicroXAM three-dimensional profilometer to characterize the wettability, ball indentation hardness, creep resistance, friction and wear performance. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to describe the morphology of the sample surface of unused and retrieved UHMWPE after friction and wear test. Surface differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to calculate the surface crystallinity of UHMWPE. The results showed that the contact angle of retrieved UHMWPE with bovine calf serum was obviously decreased by about 15% compared with unused UHMWPE. The surface crystallinity of retrieved UHMWPE increased 9.6% compared with unused UHMWPE. All of these induced the ball indentation hardness and creep resistance decreased 18% and 31%, the wear loss of retrieved UHMWPE increased 24% compared with unused UHMWPE.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0268-0890(98)90008-110.1016/S0268-0890(98)90008-1 ↗
2. Pokorny D. · Acta Chir. Orthop. · 2010 · 77 · 8710.55095/achot2010/017 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90038-410.1016/S0883-5403(99)90038-4 ↗
4. 10.1243/095441100153521910.1243/0954411001535219 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.11.04810.1016/j.wear.2010.11.048 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00616-010.1016/S0043-1648(01)00616-0 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00776-008-1233-710.1007/s00776-008-1233-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)83282-010.1016/0142-9612(96)83282-0 ↗
9. 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.1880910.1302/0301-620X.89B8.18809 ↗
10. 10.1097/01.blo.0000246547.18187.0b10.1097/01.blo.0000246547.18187.0b ↗
11. 10.1002/app.3229010.1002/app.32290 ↗
12. 10.1002/1097-4636(200108)56:2<168::AID-JBM1081>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/1097-4636(200108)56:2<168::AID-JBM1081>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.01010.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.010 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.08.07710.1016/j.apsusc.2005.08.077 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.08.00210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.08.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00021-110.1016/S0142-9612(00)00021-1 ↗
17. 10.1002/jbm.b.3129410.1002/jbm.b.31294 ↗
18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199907)46:1<112::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-U10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199907)46:1<112::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
19. 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.00610.1016/j.arth.2011.03.006 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.04.00710.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.04.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.02410.1016/j.wear.2008.02.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00272-210.1016/S0043-1648(03)00272-2 ↗
23. 10.1243/09544110232103220110.1243/095441102321032201 ↗
24. 10.1080/1042015031000159909010.1080/10420150310001599090 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00096-410.1016/S0142-9612(99)00096-4 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00196-810.1016/S0043-1648(97)00196-8 ↗
27. 10.1177/073168441039469810.1177/0731684410394698 ↗
28. Wang S.B. · J. Mech. Strength · 2007 · 2 · 579
29. 10.1557/JMR.1993.083010.1557/JMR.1993.0830 ↗
30. 10.1002/pol.1967.16005051410.1002/pol.1967.160050514 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.09.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.09.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.00910.1016/j.msec.2005.08.009 ↗