journal article·2006-10

Essential Work of Fracture (EWF) of Multilayer Films

C. Poisson, J.E. Fournier, M.F. Lacrampe, P. Krawczak

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 14· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The potential of a fracture mechanics approach (Essential Work of Fracture or EWF method) to determine the toughness of PE/PEgMAH/PA multilayer films has been investigated. The films had been modified either by blending EVA in the PE and PEgMAH layers or by inserting clay nanoparticles in the PA layer. The method was first calibrated on PE and PA single layer films. An analysis of the sensitivity of the toughness, assessed by the EWF method, to both sample geometry and test conditions has been carried out, so as to optimise the testing procedure for these materials. Then these optimal test conditions have been used to characterise PE- and PA-based multilayer films. The results show that the Essential Work of Fracture method is relevant for this type of structure, and may be more sensitive to the film composition variations than standard tensile mechanical tests, especially when the composition modification affects the layer of lowest rigidity and tensile strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ecole des Mines de Douai, Polymers and Composites Technology & Mechanical Engineering Department, 941 rue Charles Bourseul, BP 10838, F-59508 Douai Cedex, France

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Barany T. · Periodica Polytechnica Ser. Mech. Eng. · 2003 · 47 · 91
2. 10.1002/polb.1991.09029070210.1002/polb.1991.090290702 ↗
3. 10.1002/pen.1062610.1002/pen.10626 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00603-010.1016/S0032-3861(00)00603-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90840-010.1016/0032-3861(94)90840-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0142-9418(00)00049-010.1016/S0142-9418(00)00049-0 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:102475250845810.1023/A:1024752508458 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00010-910.1016/S0013-7944(03)00010-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0142-9418(99)00026-410.1016/S0142-9418(99)00026-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/0032-3861(96)85355-910.1016/0032-3861(96)85355-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00866-610.1016/S0032-3861(99)00866-6 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0036504010.1007/BF00365040 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.1065210.1002/pen.10652 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.01310.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00849-210.1016/S0032-3861(02)00849-2 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.2240510.1002/app.22405 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.2240710.1002/app.22407 ↗
18. Bureau M. N. · Polyolefin nanocomposites: Essential Work of Fracture analysis, Polymer Engineering and Science · 2004 · 44 · 1142
19. Denault J. · Processing – micro–nano-structure – performance relationship in polypropylene – organoclay nanocomposites · 2005 · 5 · 8
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.02.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.02.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00609-310.1016/S0921-5093(02)00609-3 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.2024110.1002/pen.20241 ↗