Full-Field Measurement at the Weave Scale in Hemp/Epoxy Composite Using Digital Image Correlation
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the strain field analysis of a woven hemp composite. Two different stacking sequences were tested: [0/90] 7 and [±45] 7 . Tensile tests were coupled with a digital image correlation method in order to measure in-plane longitudinal, transverse and shear strain fields. Strong heterogeneities were observed in both stacking sequences. The obtained spatial resolution was fine enough to allow the comparison of maximum and minimum deformation areas in strain fields with the corresponding weave architecture. It was observed that strain levels were directly linked with strand positions. Results gave, for the studied woven hemp composite, a complete analysis of the local deformation mechanisms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut Pprime, CNRS-ISAE-ENSMA-Université de Poitiers UPR 3346, Département Physique et Mécanique des Matériaux, ENSMA, 1, Avenue Clément Ader, 86961 Futuroscope Chasseneuil, France
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00089-110.1016/S0921-3449(01)00089-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.06.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.06.002 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10443-006-9010-210.1007/s10443-006-9010-2 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.027 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.024 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.07.00910.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.07.009 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.021 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.032 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.09.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.09.011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.011 ↗
16. Bonnafous C. · 2010
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.015 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.02910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.029 ↗
19. 10.1117/12.797677810.1117/12.7976778 ↗
20. Bahlouli M.A. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 20 · 114
21. 10.1007/BF0232869910.1007/BF02328699 ↗
22. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.13-14.6510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.13-14.65 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00058-910.1016/S0013-7944(02)00058-9 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11340-010-9335-510.1007/s11340-010-9335-5 ↗
25. 10.1364/AO.41.00660310.1364/AO.41.006603 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matchar.2004.07.00910.1016/j.matchar.2004.07.009 ↗