journal article·2016-02

Defects Characterization in CFRP Using X-ray Computed Tomography

Xueshu Liu, Fei Chen

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 24· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Although carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) is ideally high mechanical performance, manufacturing induced defects are hardly avoidable and their appearances generally result in a loss of mechanical properties. To accurately characterize this kind of defects is a foundation to estimate mechanical performance of a CFRP structure. Compared to the traditional defect assessment methods, X-ray computed tomography (CT) has been approved a promising method due to its ability to provide spatial information of defect. In this study, the effect of resolution on the accuracy of defects estimation was investigated in details. Scanning data obtained by using two different resolutions were comparatively studied based on delamination characterization. In addition, an image processing based method for porosity estimation was discussed as well. It is concluded that it is possible for us to enlarge our region of interest by selecting a reasonable resolution not at cost of losing too much desired details.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, P.R. China

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.014 ↗
2. Zhang B. · Joint ASME/ASCE/SES Conference on Mechanics and Materials, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, 2005.
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.03110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.031 ↗
5. Kastner J. · 2nd International Symposium on NDT in Aerosapce 2010 · 2010
6. 10.1177/109963620934427310.1177/1099636209344273 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.025 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.019 ↗
9. Nikishkov Y. · Journal of Composite Materials · 2013 · 1
10. 10.1080/03602559.2013.84370010.1080/03602559.2013.843700 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00075-610.1016/S1359-835X(01)00075-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.04.00410.1016/j.commatsci.2009.04.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.00110.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.03310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.033 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60028-510.1016/S1005-0302(11)60028-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.023 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.04.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2014.04.004 ↗
19. Selmi A. · 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, ICETET2014 · 2014