journal article·2026-03Open access

Epoxy-based biocomposites reinforced with alkali-treated coir fibers and bamboo fillers for lightweight applications: Unravelling of physicomechanical, chemical, structural, and microstructural characteristics

Yogesh, Deepak Kumar, Anil Punia, Lalit Ranakoti, Shubham Sharma, Krishna Prakash Arunachalam, Mohamed Abbas, Krishnaraj Ramaswamy

Abstract

This study develops a novel biocomposite using coir fiber and bamboo filler in an epoxy matrix. The density of alkali-treated coir fiber was found to be decreased from 1470 ± 20 kg/m 3 to 1284 ± 24 kg/m 3 , while the bamboo filler density reduced from 965 ± 24 kg/m 3 to 846 ± 19 kg/m 3 , indicating successful reduction in fiber density for lightweight composite applications. Alkali treatment led to a significant 58.8% increase in tensile strength of the coir/epoxy composite, rising from 28.63 MPa to 45.45 MPa. Incorporation of bamboo filler further enhanced the tensile strength by 89.5%, reaching 54.26 MPa. Flexural strength also improved, with untreated coir/epoxy composites showing 25.75 MPa, increasing to 28.26 MPa post-alkali treatment (a 9.75% enhancement) and to 31.35 MPa with bamboo filler (21.74% increase). Impact resistance significantly improved, with the coir/epoxy composite’s impact strength rising from 26.43 kJ/m 2 to 31.45 kJ/m 2 after alkali treatment (a 19.01% increase) and to 34.56 kJ/m 2 with bamboo filler (30.78% increase). The biocomposite also exhibited reduced moisture absorption, with the highest moisture absorption observed being 6.76% for NaOH-treated coir/epoxy composites and 4.32% for composites containing both coir and bamboo fillers. This study demonstrates that integrating alkali-treated coir fiber and bamboo filler produces a lightweight, eco-friendly composite with superior mechanical performance, offering a promising alternative to conventional materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Bamboo properties and applications · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Rao Pahlad Singh College of Engineering and Technology

COER University

Graphic Era Deemed to Be University

Lloyd Institute of Engineering & Technology

Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University

Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences

Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana

King Khalid University

Dambi Dollo University

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/089270571243957110.1177/0892705712439571 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.01.00610.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.01.006 ↗
3. Kumar D, Mandal A. Surrogate model-based stochastic FPF study of tensile-loaded laminated. : Springer Nature, n.d. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3654-6
4. 10.1007/s10924-021-02199-y10.1007/s10924-021-02199-y ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12869110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128691 ↗
6. 10.1080/15440478.2010.52931210.1080/15440478.2010.529312 ↗
7. 10.1007/s13399-023-04420-510.1007/s13399-023-04420-5 ↗
8. 10.15376/biores.7.3.3515-352410.15376/biores.7.3.3515-3524 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12221-021-0222-810.1007/s12221-021-0222-8 ↗
10. Bahuguna V, Rakesh PK, Mandal A, et al. Characterisation of gaina cocoon foam: a promising and eco-friendly alternative to synthetic materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 2023; 238: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207231216867
11. Kumar R, Rakesh PK, Sreehari D, et al. Preparation, characterisation and properties of green composites from Pinus roxburghii fibre. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 2024; 238: 1457–1466. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207231225068
12. 10.1038/s41598-019-47419-710.1038/s41598-019-47419-7 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11676-015-0106-010.1007/s11676-015-0106-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.12710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.127 ↗
15. 10.1080/15440478.2022.206167010.1080/15440478.2022.2061670 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00556-010.1016/S0921-5093(99)00556-0 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00054-710.1016/S1359-8368(98)00054-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1386-1425(01)00697-710.1016/S1386-1425(01)00697-7 ↗
19. Weyenberg IVD, Ivens J, Coster AD, et al. Influence of processing and chemical treatment of flax fibres on their composites, 2003, vol 63, pp. 1241–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00093-9
20. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00261-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00261-6 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-810.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.11379010.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.113790 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13833110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138331 ↗
24. 10.1039/D1NA00631B10.1039/D1NA00631B ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.01410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.014 ↗
26. 10.1007/s13296-023-00743-110.1007/s13296-023-00743-1 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1414276910.3390/polym14142769 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.13610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.136 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12450910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124509 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.063 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.05610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.056 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10924-021-02284-210.1007/s10924-021-02284-2 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1004040310.3390/polym10040403 ↗
34. 10.1080/15440478.2020.182129110.1080/15440478.2020.1821291 ↗
35. 10.1007/s00170-019-04581-610.1007/s00170-019-04581-6 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.10027110.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100271 ↗
37. 10.1007/s13399-023-04245-210.1007/s13399-023-04245-2 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0014-3057(00)00199-310.1016/S0014-3057(00)00199-3 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10570-020-03172-z10.1007/s10570-020-03172-z ↗
40. 10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
41. 10.1080/15440478.2020.173190910.1080/15440478.2020.1731909 ↗
42. 10.15376/biores.12.4.8419-844210.15376/biores.12.4.8419-8442 ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1004046110.3390/polym10040461 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11387410.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113874 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.17010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.170 ↗
46. 10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/01200110.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012001 ↗