journal article·2024-01Open access

Optimisation of bonded and hybrid step lap joints of thick carbon fibre/epoxy panels used in aircraft structures

Nabil M Chowdhury, John Wang, Wing Kong Chiu, Paul Chang

Abstract

The use of composite materials is widely spread across the Aerospace sector. Scarf and step lap joints are amongst the most commonly used methods for flush joint repairs; they restore original stiffness and nearly original strength. Prior investigations conducted by the authors have shown that bonded and hybrid step lap joints have superior static strength capabilities than bolted joints. Hybrid step lap joints have shown the highest fatigue resistance than its bolted and bonded counterparts. This investigation aims at optimising the previous step lap joint design containing five steps with a 90 mm long overlap length in order to improve joint efficiency. Four new step lap joint configurations are considered based on a parametric study conducted using Abaqus; two of which contain seven steps and a 130 mm long overlap (bonded and hybrid) whilst the other two contain six steps and a 105 mm long overlap (bonded and hybrid) with a tapered outer step region. Experimental tests right through to numerical modelling using three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models have been investigated. Adhesive non-linear material properties, fastener contacts and friction forces were all included in the 3D FE models. The Multicontinuum Theory (MCT) is used to simulate the progressive failure process and determine the stress states in the four configurations. Overall the FE models are able to accurately predict the bonded and hybrid joint strengths and highlights the importance of not only optimising the number of steps and their lengths but also the individual step heights. This is a parameter which has often been overlooked by fellow researchers. Experimental results showed that all four step lap joint configurations have significant improvement under static and fatigue load cases; the greatest improvement is seen in the two bonded step lap joint configurations. Overall the hybrid joint configuration consistently outperformed the bonded joint configurations. The presence of fasteners supress crack propagation, minimise peak peeling stresses at the ends of the overlap and increase the durability of the joint. This enables early crack detection which can assist composite joint repair certification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

Aerospace Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Fishermans Bend, VIC, Australia

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0263-8223(93)90205-510.1016/0263-8223(93)90205-5 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.93910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.939 ↗
3. 10.1016/0010-4361(77)90027-110.1016/0010-4361(77)90027-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.04810.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.048 ↗
5. Hart-Smith J · ASM Handbook · 1998 · 21 · 167
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00028-710.1016/S0266-3538(99)00028-7 ↗
8. Baker A, Chester R, Bonded repair technology for aging aircraft. In: 2001, RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on “Life Management Techniques for Ageing Air Vehicles”, Manchester, UK, 8−11 October 2001.
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.07110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.071 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.009 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.031 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.025 ↗
14. 10.2514/3.4523710.2514/3.45237 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.023 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.00310.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/0263-8223(95)00034-810.1016/0263-8223(95)00034-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/0010-4361(82)90168-910.1016/0010-4361(82)90168-9 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219983710050030810.1177/002199837100500308 ↗
20. Hart-Smith L · 1973
21. 10.1016/0013-7944(89)90165-310.1016/0013-7944(89)90165-3 ↗
22. Seneviratne WP, Tomblin JS, Crevens T. Durability and residual strength assessment of F/A-18 A-D wing-root stepped-lap joint. In: AIAA. Virginia, 2011.10.2514/6.2011-7032 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00119-710.1016/S0263-8223(00)00119-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.024 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.04910.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.049 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.016 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.05.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2009.05.011 ↗
29. 10.1177/00219983990330240210.1177/002199839903302402 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.11.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2004.11.003 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00103-210.1016/S0263-8223(98)00103-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.00810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.008 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.03010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.030 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.004 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.038 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.07810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.078 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.06110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.061 ↗
38. HEXCEL · 2011
39. Cytec · 2011
40. Cytec · 2011
41. Donough MJ, Gunnion AJ, Orifici AC, et al. Critical assessment of failure criteria for adhesively bonded composite repair design. In: 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Brisbane, 2012.
42. 10.1177/00219983710050010610.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
43. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00219-710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00219-7 ↗
45. 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90198-P10.1016/0010-4361(91)90198-P ↗
46. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00090-110.1016/S1359-835X(99)00090-1 ↗
47. Ha SK · J Compos Mater · 2008
48. Hart-Smith LJ. Further developments in the design and analysis of adhesive-bonded structural joints. In: American Society for Testing and Materials Symposium on Joining of Composite Materials. Minneapolis, MN, 1980.10.1520/STP33472S ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.016 ↗
50. Johnson W · 2005
51. Baker A · 2004 · 275