journal article·2021-11Open access

Synthetic glass and jute fabric reinforced soy-based biocomposites: Development and characterization

Ajaya Kumar Behera, Chirasmayee Mohanty, Nigamananda Das

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 29· Issue 9_suppl

Abstract

In this work, both glass fabric and jute fabric reinforced nanoclay modified soy matrix-based composites were developed and characterized. Glass fabric (60 wt.%) reinforced composite showed maximum tensile strength of 70.2 MPa and thermal stability up to 202°C, which are 82.8% and 12.2% higher than those observed with corresponding jute composite. Water absorption and contact angle values of glass-soy specimens were tested, and found composites are water stable. Biodegradation study of composites under soil burial condition revealed that glass-soy composite with 40 wt.% glass fabric lost maximum 32.6% of its original weight after 60 days of degradation. The developed glass fabric-soy hybrid composites with reasonable mechanical, thermal, and hydrolytic stability can be used in different sectors as an alternative to the nondegradable thermoplastic reinforced glass fabric composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/073168441453079010.1177/0731684414530790 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.011 ↗
3. 10.3390/fib808004810.3390/fib8080048 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.00710.1016/j.dental.2010.11.007 ↗
5. Kim HH · J Mater Sci Chem Eng · 2014 · 2 · 38
6. 10.1002/app.1345410.1002/app.13454 ↗
7. 10.1177/073168440809036210.1177/0731684408090362 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2053210.1002/pc.20532 ↗
9. Divakar H · Int J Eng Res Technol · 2015 · 4 · 1127
10. Wazery MS · Int J Appl Sci Eng · 2017 · 14 · 121
11. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.023 ↗
12. 10.15376/biores.8.3.4468-448310.15376/biores.8.3.4468-4483 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1315333310.3390/ma13153333 ↗
14. 10.1088/1468-6996/14/6/06500110.1088/1468-6996/14/6/065001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.32910.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.329 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.06110.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.061 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00468-018-1707-y10.1007/s00468-018-1707-y ↗
18. 10.1590/0104-1428.0281810.1590/0104-1428.02818 ↗
19. Sariyeh P · Iran J Chem Chem Eng · 2020 · 39 · 59
20. 10.1007/s13204-021-01772-010.1007/s13204-021-01772-0 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10924-020-01944-z10.1007/s10924-020-01944-z ↗
22. 10.1002/pls2.1002010.1002/pls2.10020 ↗