Evaluation of structural integrity of needle punched banana fiber reinforced industrial safety helmets
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to fabricate and analyse a light weight, recyclable, and non-toxic natural fiber reinforced industrial safety helmet. The fibers were extracted from agro-waste pseudostem of nendran variety banana plant. A facile needle punching technique was employed on banana fibers to produce a needle punched non-woven banana fiber fabric of enhanced mechanical properties without any chemical treatment. Subsequently, the needle punched banana fibers were impregnated with general purpose helmet grade polyester resin in an ISI (Indian standards Institute) endorsed mold to fabricate a needle punched banana fiber helmet (NPBFH). Similarly, 30 mm random banana fiber helmet (RBFH) and glass fiber reinforced helmets (RGFH) were fabricated. The fabricated helmets of 10–50 wt. % fiber content were tested as per ISI standards. The results show that the better properties were achieved at 40 wt. % of fiber content for all varieties of helmets. Significantly, the results revealed that the shock absorption, penetration resistance, and water absorption of NPBFH are 245 kgf, 4.75 mm, and 0.61%, respectively, which is much better than RBFH and comparable with RGFH. This study concluded that the NPBFH (40 wt. %) can be a potential replacement of synthetic fiber reinforced helmets for industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Puducherry, Karaikal, India
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/09506608.2016.127108910.1080/09506608.2016.1271089 ↗
2. 10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00096-410.1016/s0266-3538(03)00096-4 ↗
3. 10.3390/polym1303047110.3390/polym13030471 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
5. 10.1177/152808372092473010.1177/1528083720924730 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014 ↗
7. Hobson J · JEC Composites · 2011 · 63 · 31
8. 10.3390/polym1303042310.3390/polym13030423 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.09410.1016/j.rser.2017.05.094 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.17210.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.172 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.020 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.12410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.124 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1313217010.3390/polym13132170 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.10010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.100 ↗
15. 10.1177/002199831878022710.1177/0021998318780227 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1309153210.3390/polym13091532 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.033 ↗
18. 10.1177/0040517521100861510.1177/00405175211008615 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10924-020-01939-w10.1007/s10924-020-01939-w ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.013 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.07110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.071 ↗
22. 10.1016/s0266-3538(02)00098-210.1016/s0266-3538(02)00098-2 ↗
23. 10.1515/polyeng-2019-008510.1515/polyeng-2019-0085 ↗
24. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-076010.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-0760 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.02610.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.026 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.014 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10730510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107305 ↗
28. Jack JK · Compos Sci Technol · 2020 · 185 · 107890
29. 10.1016/j.tws.2015.01.00410.1016/j.tws.2015.01.004 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.08.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.08.008 ↗
31. 10.1177/096739112094241910.1177/0967391120942419 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.002 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2558810.1002/pc.25588 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.01710.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.017 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.005 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.03310.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.033 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.03.01510.1016/j.matdes.2004.03.015 ↗
38. 10.1002/mame.20100009510.1002/mame.201000095 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.012 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.027 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10320310.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103203 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1304064610.3390/polym13040646 ↗
43. 10.1080/10803548.2017.137398710.1080/10803548.2017.1373987 ↗
44. EL-Wazery MS · Int J Appl Sci Eng · 2017 · 14 · 121
45. 10.1007/s12221-009-0193-710.1007/s12221-009-0193-7 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.04510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.045 ↗
47. Russell SJ. Handbook of Nonwovens. Cambridge: Wood head Publishing, 2006, pp. 1–544.10.1201/9781439823453 ↗
48. 10.1080/10589759.2019.168449110.1080/10589759.2019.1684491 ↗
49. Surajit S · Indian J Fibre Textile Res · 2008 · 33 · 411
50. Ganguly PK · Indian J Fibre Textile Res · 1999 · 24 · 34
51. Jack JK · J Test Eval · 2020 · 49 · 740
52. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.12.02510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.12.025 ↗