Effect of sisal fiber on retrogradation and structural characteristics of thermoplastic cassava starch
Source abstract
Abstract
Thermoplastic cassava starch (TPS)/sisal fiber (SF) composites were prepared by the melting method. The effect of SF on the retrogradation kinetics, morphology and size of spherulites, molecular interactions, short-range molecular structure, and crystal type of TPS was investigated. The results indicate that the retrogradation degree and rate of TPS increase with the addition of SF, and the spherulites become clearer and denser. The neat TPS sample forms an A-type crystal through double helix structure and a V-type crystal through single helix structure. After the addition of SF, the A-type crystal of the TPS/SF composite decreases and the V-type crystal increases. With the further increase of SF content, the TPS/SF composite mainly presents the V-type crystal. The TPS/SF composite has higher crystallinity, but smaller crystal size and interplanar spacing. The storage modulus, loss modulus, and glass transition temperature (T g ) of TPS get enhanced with the addition of SF.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Food composition and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Natural Polymer Chemistry and Physics, College of Chemistry and Materials, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
Funding
Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10937310.1016/j.matdes.2020.109373 ↗
2. Jiang T · Adv Ind Eng Polym Res · 2020 · 3 · 8
3. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.063 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.11.01010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.11.010 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.00910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.009 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.06810.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.068 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.11310.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.113 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.16010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.160 ↗
10. 10.1002/polb.2143710.1002/polb.21437 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.02110.1016/j.indcrop.2010.12.021 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.4568710.1002/app.45687 ↗
13. 10.1016/0141-8130(87)90044-410.1016/0141-8130(87)90044-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00020-110.1016/S0268-005X(03)00020-1 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.4536710.1002/app.45367 ↗
16. 10.1021/cm021286510.1021/cm0212865 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b0545710.1021/acs.jafc.7b05457 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/0926-6690(95)00048-810.1016/0926-6690(95)00048-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.05110.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.051 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00301-710.1016/S0032-3861(97)00301-7 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.2519310.1002/app.25193 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.04110.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.041 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.09.02110.1016/j.carbpol.2008.09.021 ↗
25. 10.1021/jf00005a01310.1021/jf00005a013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.00210.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.002 ↗