The influence of polymer concentration on the morphology and mechanical properties of asymmetric polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) membrane for O 2 /N 2 separation
Source abstract
Abstract
The polymeric based membrane technology has been an attractive alternative option among other gas separation technologies due to its ease of operation, good efficiency and low operational cost. However, a few concerns have been expressed about the polymeric based membrane technology for GS applications, such as the permeability-selectivity trade-off, mechanical stability and its environmental impacts. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to investigate the effects of polymer concentration on a biopolymer-PVA asymmetric membrane morphology, its mechanical properties and gas transport behaviour in order to optimize it for O 2 /N 2 separation using the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) technique. For this purpose, initially, a theoretical solubility model and cloud point phase diagram analysis were conducted to study the solubility and demixing behaviour of the PVA/Water/THF ternary system. Afterwards, these membranes were prepared at different polymeric concentrations from 10 to 14 weight percent (wt.%) and then characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), porosity measurement test, universal testing machine (UTM) and gas permeation test to analyse their physical structure, mechanical properties and GS performance. The analysis results showed that a lower polymer concentration of 10 wt.% facilitated larger pore sizes of 2.486 ± 1.2 μm with a higher porosity of 77.73 ± 15.26% having higher O 2 permeance but lower O 2 /N 2 selectivity and mechanical properties. Whereas, a higher polymer concentration of 12 wt.% promoted smaller pore sizes of 2.096 ± 0.5 μm with a porosity of 56.31 ± 3.6%, having better O 2 /N 2 separation performance and higher mechanical properties. However, increasing the polymeric concentration to 14 wt.% resulted in a densified membrane structure having voids and small pore sizes of 1.447 ± 0.9 μm, with a porosity of 31.35 ± 11.98%, and lower elasticity causing membrane rigidified, making it unsuitable for GS applications. Therefore, the intermediate concentration of 12 wt.% PVA asymmetric membrane represents the most optimum morphology and mechanical properties for better O 2 /N 2 separation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Membrane Separation Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical and Materials Engineering (SCME), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Sector H-12 Islamabad, Pakistan
Department of Chemical, Mechanical, Materials, and Mining Engineering, Pak-Austria Fachhochschule, Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, Haripur, KPK, Pakistan
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Peshawar (25000), Pakistan
Funding
Higher Education Commission, Pakistan
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/047002039310.1002/0470020393 ↗
2. Mulder M · 2012
3. 10.3390/nano802006510.3390/nano8020065 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b0146410.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01464 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.14710.1016/j.cej.2014.11.147 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.desal.2011.12.00310.1016/j.desal.2011.12.003 ↗
7. 10.1021/ie101928r10.1021/ie101928r ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.04.02910.1016/j.polymer.2012.04.029 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.011 ↗
10. Ismail N · J Appl Membr Sci Technology · 2017 · 21
11. Hamzah S · J Eng Appl Sci · 2014 · 9 · 2543
12. 10.1002/app.1991.07043081110.1002/app.1991.070430811 ↗
13. Hasbullah H · Chem Eng Trans · 2013 · 32 · 2035
14. Mohamed F, Hasbullah H, Jamian W, et al. Gas Permeation Performance of Poly (Lactic Acid) Asymmetric Membrane for O 2/N 2 separationICGSCE 2014. Springer, 2015, pp. 149–156.10.1007/978-981-287-505-1_18 ↗
15. Karim SS · J Polym Environ · 2020 · 1
16. Lara J · 2017
17. Hansen CM · 2000
18. 10.1080/1542140090304869310.1080/15421400903048693 ↗
19. 10.1016/0032-3861(85)90090-410.1016/0032-3861(85)90090-4 ↗
20. 10.1080/1023666X.2018.148561310.1080/1023666X.2018.1485613 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10924-016-0783-610.1007/s10924-016-0783-6 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.3018410.1002/app.30184 ↗
23. Farrukh S · J Appl Polym Sci · 2014 · 131
24. Azam SU · Environ Sci Pollut Res · 2020 · 1
25. Raza A · Trans Indian Ceram Soc · 2021 · 1
26. Ebrahimpour M · Int Bus Manag · 2016 · 10 · 5876
27. 10.1039/C7RA03566G10.1039/C7RA03566G ↗
28. Mustaffar M, Ismail A, Illias R. Study on the effect of polymer concentration on hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane performance and morphology. In: Reg Conf Eng Educ RCEE 2005 2004, pp. 1–12.
29. Julian H · J Eng · 2012 · 2 · 484
30. 10.1002/app.1174410.1002/app.11744 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym1107116010.3390/polym11071160 ↗
32. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.4610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.46 ↗
33. Amirabedi P · J Textiles Polym · 2013 · 1 · 24
34. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.06910.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.069 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0270713510.1007/BF02707135 ↗