Friction and wear of two polyethylenes under different tribological contact conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Tribological properties of ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) were studied in two different wear modes. Firstly, reciprocating sliding wear studies under non-conformal contact investigated the effects of counterface surface roughness (polished, lapped and ground) of Ti6Al4V on the friction and wear of the polyethylenes. Secondly, two-body abrasive wear studies in conformal contact against different abrasive grit size papers were also carried out to ascertain the wear sensitivity of the polyethylenes under these adverse conditions. Wear mechanisms were studied using optical and scanning electron micrographs. The results of the reciprocating sliding wear studies showed that surface roughness of the counterface influenced friction and wear characteristics although no correlation was found between the coefficient of friction and specific wear rate. XLPE demonstrated wear sensitivity, particularly under severe abrasive wear condition. The results indicated that the performance of the polyethylenes greatly depends upon the tribological system under which it is operating.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
Division 6.3 – Macrotribology and Wear Protection, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Berlin, Germany
School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11999-011-1872-410.1007/s11999-011-1872-4 ↗
2. Harris WH · Clin Orthop Relat Res · 1995 · 311 · 46
3. 10.1002/jor.110017020310.1002/jor.1100170203 ↗
4. Pruitt LA · J Bio Mater Res B Appl Biomat · 2013 · 101 · 47610.1002/jbm.b.32887 ↗
5. 10.1243/095441101153345410.1243/0954411011533454 ↗
6. 10.1007/3-540-27658-0_5710.1007/3-540-27658-0_57 ↗
7. 10.1243/095441100153539010.1243/0954411001535390 ↗
8. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_407_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_407_02 ↗
9. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_408_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_408_02 ↗
10. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_353_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_353_02 ↗
11. Dowson D · J Am Chem Soc · 1985 · 12 · 171
12. 10.1177/095441191347952810.1177/0954411913479528 ↗
13. 10.2106/00004623-200300001-0000310.2106/00004623-200300001-00003 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.1047110.1002/jbm.10471 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma703170910.3390/ma7031709 ↗
16. 10.1002/tt.302001040310.1002/tt.3020010403 ↗
17. 10.1002/pen.2523910.1002/pen.25239 ↗
18. 10.1119/1.193301710.1119/1.1933017 ↗
19. 10.1098/rspa.1972.011210.1098/rspa.1972.0112 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.07.01610.1016/j.triboint.2005.07.016 ↗
21. Stachowiak GW, Batchelor AW. Engineering tribology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2005, p. 619.
22. 10.1007/s11249-016-0763-y10.1007/s11249-016-0763-y ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.02510.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.025 ↗
24. 10.1155/2011/17894310.1155/2011/178943 ↗
25. 10.1002/pi.498010011410.1002/pi.4980100114 ↗
26. 10.1016/B978-0-08-025444-9.50008-810.1016/B978-0-08-025444-9.50008-8 ↗
27. 10.1243/095441102153633310.1243/0954411021536333 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)80002-810.1016/S0883-5403(98)80002-8 ↗
29. 10.1243/13506500276235532510.1243/135065002762355325 ↗
30. 10.1016/0043-1648(71)90033-010.1016/0043-1648(71)90033-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/0043-1648(92)90033-510.1016/0043-1648(92)90033-5 ↗
32. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.610.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.6 ↗
33. 10.1097/00003086-199912000-0000810.1097/00003086-199912000-00008 ↗
34. 10.1054/arth.2001.2723410.1054/arth.2001.27234 ↗
35. 10.1243/PIME_CONF_1968_183_283_0210.1243/PIME_CONF_1968_183_283_02 ↗
36. Ratner SB · Soviet Plastic · 1964 · 7 · 37