journal article·2022-01Open access

A critical review on damage modeling and failure analysis of pin joints in fiber reinforced composite laminates

Akash Gupta, Manjeet Singh, Jaswinder Singh, Sunpreet Singh, Chander Prakash

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced composite material plays a vital role in structural engineering due to its lightweight and high strength ratio which becomes a key material in a mechanically fastened pin joint. Recent review articles in this area were restricted to the numerical and experimental approaches which are used for strength prediction of pin joints in polymer matrix composites. The present study begins with an extensive analysis of relevant studies in the provided structurally clamped joint region using numerous numerical approaches and theories of failure. Numerous experimental and numerical approaches are available nowadays and have been cited by the researchers in their respective research to foretell the damage initiation and failure mode in the composite joint. The study gives the review of different numerical analyses of composite joints by utilizing interactive criteria for failure analysis, viz. Tsai-Wu, Tsai-Hill, Yamada Sun’s theory predicts failure using higher-order polynomial equations that comprise all stress or strain components, whereas limit stress criteria i.e. Maximum stress criterion which uses linear equations for finding the solution. Progressive Damage Analysis (PDA) quantifies matrix and fiber failure using the material depletion rule preceded by Hashin’s theory which offers a good interpretation irrespective of the types of composite material. In the end, various parameters are discussed which enhance joint performance under different loading conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lovely Professional University

Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology

National University of Singapore

References (87)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11340-006-8735-z10.1007/s11340-006-8735-z ↗
2. 10.14429/dsj.67.1154110.14429/dsj.67.11541 ↗
3. 10.14429/dsj.65.867610.14429/dsj.65.8676 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.03710.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.037 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.05.00910.1016/j.matdes.2007.05.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.017 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.011 ↗
10. Sekhon M, Saini JS, Singla G, et al. Influence of nanoparticle fillers content on the bearing strength behavior of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composites pin joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mater Des Appl 2017; 231: 641–656.
11. 10.1080/15376494.2012.67710910.1080/15376494.2012.677109 ↗
12. Chang F, Scott RA, Springer GS. Strength of mechanically fastended composite joints. J Compos Mater 1974; 8: 253–265.
13. 10.1177/00219983990330240210.1177/002199839903302402 ↗
14. 10.1177/00219983950290010210.1177/002199839502900102 ↗
15. 10.1177/00219983950290050710.1177/002199839502900507 ↗
16. Kermanidis T, Labeas G, Tserpes KI, et al. Finite element modeling of damage accumulation in bolted composite joints under incremental tensile loading. Eur Congr Comput Methods Appl Sci Eng ECCOMAS 2000; 2000: 11–14.
17. 10.2514/2.35410.2514/2.354 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.03110.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.031 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.007 ↗
20. 10.1111/ffe.1235810.1111/ffe.12358 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.024 ↗
22. 10.1177/00219983740080030310.1177/002199837400800303 ↗
23. 10.14429/dsj.65.891710.14429/dsj.65.8917 ↗
24. 10.1177/00219983780120030510.1177/002199837801200305 ↗
25. Aluko O. An analytical method for failure prediction of composite pinned joints. Lect Notes Eng Comput Sci 2011; 2192: 2581–2587.
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.05310.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.053 ↗
27. 10.1177/00219983960300140510.1177/002199839603001405 ↗
28. 10.14429/dsj.69.1334810.14429/dsj.69.13348 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.07110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.071 ↗
30. Atas A. Strength prediction of mechanical joints in composite laminates based on subcritical damage modelling. Sheffield, UK: The University of Sheffield, 2012.
31. Ataş A. Failure analysis of bolted joints in cross-ply composite laminates using cohesive zone elements. Comput Mater Contin 2013; 34: 199–225.
32. 10.1179/1743289811Y.000000003810.1179/1743289811Y.0000000038 ↗
33. Hart-Smith LJ. Bolted joints in graphite-epoxy composites. NASA Langley report NASA CR-144899, 1976. Epub ahead of print 1976.
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.017 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10704-005-4729-610.1007/s10704-005-4729-6 ↗
36. 10.1533/9781845694821.1.310.1533/9781845694821.1.3 ↗
37. 10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-310.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
38. Pinho ST, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, et al. Failure models and criteria for FRP under in-plane or three-dimensional stress states including shear non-linearity. Nasa/Tm-2005-213530, 2005, p. 68.
39. 10.1177/002199830504645210.1177/0021998305046452 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.023 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.07110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.071 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00071-410.1016/S0266-3538(02)00071-4 ↗
43. 10.1142/S021987621830001510.1142/S0219876218300015 ↗
44. 10.1007/s12046-017-0612-110.1007/s12046-017-0612-1 ↗
45. 10.1080/01495739.2017.128753410.1080/01495739.2017.1287534 ↗
46. 10.1177/00219983820160020310.1177/002199838201600203 ↗
47. 10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00054-910.1016/S1359-8368(02)00054-9 ↗
48. 10.1080/10759419930550210.1080/107594199305502 ↗
49. 10.1177/00219983870210080210.1177/002199838702100802 ↗
50. 10.1007/s12567-020-00335-310.1007/s12567-020-00335-3 ↗
51. 10.1177/002199831246215810.1177/0021998312462158 ↗
52. Kodagali K, Tessema A, Kidane A. Progressive failure analysis of a composite lamina using Puck failure criteria. 32nd Tech Conf Am Soc Compos 2017; 2: 850–861.
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.011 ↗
54. Ladeveze P Trovalet M Lubineau G. A multiscale damage model for the analysis of laminated composite structures on the microscale. In17th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM 17) Edinburgh (UK) 2009.
55. 10.1016/B978-1-78242-286-0.00014-510.1016/B978-1-78242-286-0.00014-5 ↗
56. 10.1177/07316844880070060210.1177/073168448800700602 ↗
57. Tsai SW, Hahn HT. Introduction to composite materials. CT: Technomic Publishing Company, 1980.
58. 10.2514/6.1983-83710.2514/6.1983-837 ↗
59. 10.1080/0950711910944674810.1080/09507119109446748 ↗
60. 10.1007/BF0086068510.1007/BF00860685 ↗
61. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
62. 10.1177/073168440504295810.1177/0731684405042958 ↗
63. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00004-310.1016/S1359-835X(97)00004-3 ↗
64. Yan UM, Sun HT, Wei WD, et al. Response and failure of composite plates with a bolt-filled hole. National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia.
65. 10.1177/00219983730070040410.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
66. 10.1007/s11029-016-9540-010.1007/s11029-016-9540-0 ↗
67. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-110.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-1 ↗
68. Deuschle HM, Kroplin B-H. 3D failure analysis of UD fibre reinforced composites: puck’s theory within FEA.pdf>, 2010.
69. 10.1007/s10704-005-3077-x10.1007/s10704-005-3077-x ↗
70. Herakovich CT. Mechanics of Fibrous Composites. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1997.
71. 10.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00069-310.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00069-3 ↗
72. 10.1007/BF0001300510.1007/BF00013005 ↗
73. 10.1007/3-211-38102-3_510.1007/3-211-38102-3_5 ↗
74. 10.1177/00219983870210040210.1177/002199838702100402 ↗
75. 10.1016/0263-8223(92)90060-P10.1016/0263-8223(92)90060-P ↗
76. 10.1016/0167-6636(85)90011-010.1016/0167-6636(85)90011-0 ↗
77. 10.14429/dsj.68.1071710.14429/dsj.68.10717 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.009 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.09.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2008.09.009 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.01.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.01.007 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.014 ↗
82. 10.1177/002199831771257210.1177/0021998317712572 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.043 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.024 ↗
85. 10.1177/002199831667892010.1177/0021998316678920 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.026 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.04110.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.041 ↗