journal article·2019-03

Study on the preparation of graphene oxide/silica/natural rubber latex composites by different processes

Chuansheng Wang, Tianhao Chang, Huiguang Bian, Luqi Zhang

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 27· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the graphene oxide/silica/natural latex composites were prepared by four different processes, including spray sputtering drying method, dry-ice–expansion predispersion method, mechanical stirring method, and traditional drying method. Compared to the other three methods, the spray sputtering method had higher physical mechanical properties and better silica dispersion in the rubber matrix. Meanwhile, the cross-linking density of vulcanizates prepared by the spray sputtering drying method is the largest. Compared with the compound prepared by mechanical stirring, the tensile strength, tear strength, and wear resistance property of the compound prepared by spray sputtering drying method increased by 13.6%, 31.5%, and 16.7%, respectively. The tensile strength, tear strength, and wear resistance property of the compound prepared by spray sputtering drying method increased by 27.2%, 43.6%, and 24.6%, respectively, than those prepared by dry mixing method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China

Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Polymer Materials, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0496910.1038/nature04969 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.04610.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.046 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.02610.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.026 ↗
4. 10.1002/pi.462710.1002/pi.4627 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.07.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2014.07.021 ↗
6. 10.5254/1.353592910.5254/1.3535929 ↗
7. 10.5254/0035-9475-58.1.110.5254/0035-9475-58.1.1 ↗
8. 10.1002/pen.76030120210.1002/pen.760301202 ↗
9. 10.1002/1097-4628(20001209)78:11<1873::AID-APP40>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/1097-4628(20001209)78:11<1873::AID-APP40>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.034 ↗
11. 10.1263/jbb.103.28710.1263/jbb.103.287 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.12.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.12.003 ↗
13. Yang J · Synthetic Rubber Industry · 2005 · 28 · 66
14. 10.1021/ma702236410.1021/ma7022364 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.2140810.1002/app.21408 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.1962.07006190610.1002/app.1962.070061906 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.2811910.1002/app.28119 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.03410.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.07.034 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.02810.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.028 ↗