journal article·2017-06

Low Velocity Impact Behaviour of Asymmetric Three-layer Sandwich Composite Structures with and without Foam Core

Azam Kavianiboroujeni, Alain Cloutier, Denis Rodrigue

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 25· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation of the impact behaviour of three layer sandwich structures made of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and hemp, with and without a foam core. Low-velocity falling weight and Charpy impact tests were performed to investigate the influence of hemp content, skin thickness and core density. The strength, load, absorbed energy, and deflection histories were recorded and analysed and the damaged specimens were inspected to determine the failure patterns. Based on the Charpy impact results, the structures with foam core had higher energy absorption capabilities compared to their counterparts without foam core. In addition, based on the falling weight impact results the energy dissipation properties of sandwich structures without foam core were superior to the structures with foam core. This property was also greatly influenced by skin fibre content, skin thickness and structure configuration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Canada

Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, G1V 0A6, Canada

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0035658710.1007/BF00356587 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.016 ↗
3. 10.1016/0020-7403(96)00010-010.1016/0020-7403(96)00010-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.03.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2009.03.010 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00564-110.1016/S0924-0136(00)00564-1 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.03610.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.036 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
9. 10.1017/CBO978051157450410.1017/CBO9780511574504 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00098-210.1016/S0263-8223(00)00098-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.19610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.196 ↗
12. Mines P. · International Journal of Impact Engineering · 1990 · 32 · 855
13. 10.1177/07316844890080050210.1177/073168448900800502 ↗
14. 10.1177/07316844890080030410.1177/073168448900800304 ↗
15. 10.1177/109963620706713410.1177/1099636207067134 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00009-410.1016/S1359-8368(02)00009-4 ↗
17. 10.1177/00219983930270130110.1177/002199839302701301 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.040 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.06610.1016/j.msea.2011.08.066 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.002 ↗
21. 10.1177/109963621559766710.1177/1099636215597667 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.1028910.1002/pen.10289 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.12.00110.1016/j.resconrec.2003.12.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.12.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.12.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.009 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-4 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00040-910.1016/S0734-743X(01)00040-9 ↗
28. Davies G. · Composite Structures · 1994 · 16 · 149
29. 10.1177/0021955X0708804410.1177/0021955X07088044 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.006 ↗
31. 10.1177/0021955X850210020710.1177/0021955X8502100207 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.012 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.09.02310.1016/j.matdes.2006.09.023 ↗
34. 10.1177/0021955X1452819110.1177/0021955X14528191 ↗
35. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)91384-H10.1016/0010-4361(95)91384-H ↗
36. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.15610.1016/j.msea.2007.11.156 ↗