journal article·2015-03

Phase Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Aliphatic Waterborne Polyurethane-Ureas: Effect of 1,6-Hexamethylene Diisocyanate (Hdi)/Isophorone Diisocyanate (Ipdi) Ratio

Heqing Fu, Kang Liu, Caibin Yan, Weifeng chen, Yin Wang

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 23· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Aliphatic waterborne polyurethane-ureas (WPUU) were prepared using 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) as mixed diisocyanates. The effects of the HDI/IPDI ratio on the phase morphology of WPUU films including the hydrogen bonding, crystallization of the soft segment and hard segment, and phase separation were investigated. The relationship between the phase morphology and the mechanical properties was also studied. The FTIR spectrum showed that the hydrogen bonding degree in the hard segments increased as the HDI/IPDI ratio increased. XRD analysis revealed the excellent crystallinity of WPUU films. DSC analysis indicated that the degree of phase separation was improved with increasing HDI/IPDI ratio, and DMA analysis showed that the storage modulus of the WPUU film increased at first and then decreased. When the HDI/IPDI ratio was 4:1, the WPUU films exhibited high tensile strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangdong, Guangzhou 510640, China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.04.06810.1016/j.jcis.2008.04.068 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.11.00310.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.11.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.06.00310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.06.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.11.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.11.001 ↗
5. 10.1021/ma201713810.1021/ma2017138 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.08.00110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.08.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.02.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.02.004 ↗
8. 10.1002/polb.2226410.1002/polb.22264 ↗
9. 10.1021/ma801942f10.1021/ma801942f ↗
10. 10.1007/s13233-011-1211-310.1007/s13233-011-1211-3 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.3352510.1002/app.33525 ↗
12. 10.1021/ma048222v10.1021/ma048222v ↗
13. 10.1002/pi.195010.1002/pi.1950 ↗
14. 10.1002/app.3476310.1002/app.34763 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.03.01310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.03.013 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.2964510.1002/app.29645 ↗
17. Wang K. · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · 2010 · 118 · 92010.1002/app.32454 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.05710.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.057 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00083-610.1016/S0142-9418(01)00083-6 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.02610.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.026 ↗
21. 10.1002/polb.2165210.1002/polb.21652 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.11.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.11.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.03510.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.035 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.2617010.1002/app.26170 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.03.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.03.006 ↗
26. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.8810.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.88 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.06510.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.065 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.02.00810.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.02.008 ↗
29. 10.1002/pola.2460210.1002/pola.24602 ↗
30. Wang K. · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · 2010 · 118 · 92010.1002/app.32454 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.01.00510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.01.005 ↗
32. 10.1002/polb.1991.09029050710.1002/polb.1991.090290507 ↗