Physicochemical characterization and release properties of oral drug delivery: A pH-sensitive nanocomposite based on sodium alginate–pectin–tannic acid–silver
Source abstract
Abstract
A pH-sensitive nanocomposite formed from sodium alginate (SA)/pectin (Pec)/tannic acid (TA)–silver (Ag) was developed using microwave irradiation and it was applied as a carrier for propranolol drug. TA acts as a cross-linker and a reducing agent for Ag ions. Physicochemical characteristics of the fabricated system using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, field-emission scanning electron microscope, high-resolution transmission electron microscope, dynamic light scattering instrument, and energy dispersive X-ray analysis. The swelling percent and the drug release were observed to be pH-sensitive. The occurrence of Ag nanoparticles in the network enhances the drug release that is 96% at pH 7.4 within 420 min. The drug release data were adjusted into different kinetic models involved zero order, first order, Higuchi, and Ritger–Peppas models. The release mechanism is a non-Fickian character where it controls by diffusion and relaxation of polymer chains. It can be concluded that SA/Pec/TA-Ag nanocomposite is a candidate for the oral drug carrier specific for the intestinal system and has ability against the gastric fluid.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Department of Microbial Biotechnology, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
Funding
Deanship of Scientific Research, Jazan University
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/19443994.2014.90597810.1080/19443994.2014.905978 ↗
2. Treesuppharat W · Biotechnol Rep(Amst) · 2017 · 15 · 84
3. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.11.02310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.11.023 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.01310.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.013 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.02.00310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.02.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jddst.2017.09.00910.1016/j.jddst.2017.09.009 ↗
7. Ghada AM · Aust J Basic Appl Sci · 2012 · 6 · 262
8. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.00110.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.001 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.b.3285610.1002/jbm.b.32856 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.10510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.105 ↗
11. 10.1002/marc.20110074210.1002/marc.201100742 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.17110.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.171 ↗
13. Yi CF · Polym Bull · 2004 · 1 · 30
14. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.02810.1016/j.msec.2017.11.028 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.027 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.03310.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.033 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.08.00510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.08.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.01.02010.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.01.020 ↗
19. Latifi AM · J Appl Biotech Rep · 2015 · 2 · 251
20. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.02.00510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.02.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.17110.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.171 ↗
22. 10.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-410.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.12810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.128 ↗
24. Arshad M · Macromol Mater Eng · 1969 · 7 · 67
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.08.09410.1016/j.apsusc.2012.08.094 ↗
26. 10.1081/DDC-12000642810.1081/DDC-120006428 ↗
27. 10.2478/v10007-009-0025-810.2478/v10007-009-0025-8 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00706-012-0776-710.1007/s00706-012-0776-7 ↗