A study on the viscoelastic behavior of chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol-graphene oxide nanocomposite films as a wound dressing
Source abstract
Abstract
The nanocomposites of Chitosan (CS)-poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) reinforced with graphene oxide (GO) were fabricated by casting in a mold. The nanocomposite films were characterized by various techniques. The viscoelastic properties of the wound dressings were evaluated by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) since the healing quality of a wound dressing depends on such properties. DMTA results also were modeled by the Cole-Cole diagram. Finally, the effects of GO on antimicrobial and biological properties of films were studied. It has been shown that nanocomposite films support the initial attachment, proliferation, and growth of mouse fibroblast cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanotechnology Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
Institute for Color Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Halal Research Center of IRI, FDA, Tehran, Iran
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/smll.20090193410.1002/smll.200901934 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20100106810.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
3. 10.1021/ar300159f10.1021/ar300159f ↗
4. 10.1039/B917103G10.1039/B917103G ↗
5. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0206710.1021/acsnano.5b02067 ↗
6. 10.1002/adem.20170062710.1002/adem.201700627 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.01910.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.019 ↗
8. 10.1007/12_2011_11810.1007/12_2011_118 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.02810.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.028 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10570-016-0925-y10.1007/s10570-016-0925-y ↗
11. 10.1039/c0jm04043f10.1039/c0jm04043f ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.13210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.132 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.09410.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.094 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.19110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.191 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.08510.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.085 ↗
17. 10.1016/0305-4179(86)90153-110.1016/0305-4179(86)90153-1 ↗
18. 10.1016/0142-9612(87)90008-110.1016/0142-9612(87)90008-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.09910.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.099 ↗
20. Ferry JD · 1980
21. Perez J · 1998
22. 10.1201/978020390840210.1201/9780203908402 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.03810.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.038 ↗
24. Parparita E · Cellul Chem Technol · 2012 · 46 · 571
25. 10.1007/s00128-011-0304-110.1007/s00128-011-0304-1 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05140.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05140.x ↗
27. 10.1021/ma035663q10.1021/ma035663q ↗
28. 10.1002/app.4104210.1002/app.41042 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.01.09510.1016/j.physb.2010.01.095 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.00210.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.002 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.03310.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.033 ↗
32. Acurio E · Adv Mater Technol · 2017
33. 10.1080/1023666X.2011.56359510.1080/1023666X.2011.563595 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.00310.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.003 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.03810.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.038 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.01310.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.013 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.05.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2008.05.011 ↗
38. 10.1021/nn101097v10.1021/nn101097v ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.05210.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.052 ↗
40. 10.1039/C6RA12192F10.1039/C6RA12192F ↗