journal article·2020-01

A study on dispersions of CB and CNT in PP/EPDM composites and their mechanical reinforcement

Xiaohang Tuo, Guizhi Ma, Qian Tan, Yumei Gong, Jing Guo

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 28· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Carbon material (carbon black (CB) and carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced composites are being studied widely. The content of the reinforcing materials is known as the main influencing factor. However, the dispersion of the reinforcing materials is often neglected or, where it is investigated, not thoroughly evaluated. In this article, the dispersion states of carbon materials in the composite materials were quantitatively analyzed using an image processing method. Meanwhile, the reliability of the image analysis was verified through the testing results of the mechanical and rheological properties of the composites. Both CB and CNTs improved the mechanical properties of maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (PP)/ethylene propylene diene monomer composites, wherein their dispersion was the dominant factor instead of their content. The dispersion of the easily agglomerated CNT was significantly poorer than that of CB. Therefore, CB was better in inducing the crystallization of PP.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Textile and Material Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0058011010.1007/BF00580110 ↗
2. 10.5254/1.354776010.5254/1.3547760 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.03910.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.039 ↗
4. 10.1080/17515831.2017.141700410.1080/17515831.2017.1417004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.007 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.04410.1016/j.msea.2004.09.044 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.008 ↗
8. 10.1039/C7NR00023E10.1039/C7NR00023E ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.03410.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.034 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.08.02310.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.08.023 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.04.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2017.04.002 ↗
12. 10.1080/03602559.2016.118563210.1080/03602559.2016.1185632 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tca.2007.08.00710.1016/j.tca.2007.08.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.06810.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.068 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.011 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00707-017-1820-910.1007/s00707-017-1820-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.00310.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.017 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.04810.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.048 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.02210.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.022 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma304288410.3390/ma3042884 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.019 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.03310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.033 ↗
25. 10.1002/macp.20130035510.1002/macp.201300355 ↗
26. 10.1002/mame.20140041910.1002/mame.201400419 ↗