A study on dispersions of CB and CNT in PP/EPDM composites and their mechanical reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon material (carbon black (CB) and carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced composites are being studied widely. The content of the reinforcing materials is known as the main influencing factor. However, the dispersion of the reinforcing materials is often neglected or, where it is investigated, not thoroughly evaluated. In this article, the dispersion states of carbon materials in the composite materials were quantitatively analyzed using an image processing method. Meanwhile, the reliability of the image analysis was verified through the testing results of the mechanical and rheological properties of the composites. Both CB and CNTs improved the mechanical properties of maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (PP)/ethylene propylene diene monomer composites, wherein their dispersion was the dominant factor instead of their content. The dispersion of the easily agglomerated CNT was significantly poorer than that of CB. Therefore, CB was better in inducing the crystallization of PP.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Textile and Material Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0058011010.1007/BF00580110 ↗
2. 10.5254/1.354776010.5254/1.3547760 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.03910.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.039 ↗
4. 10.1080/17515831.2017.141700410.1080/17515831.2017.1417004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.007 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.04410.1016/j.msea.2004.09.044 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.008 ↗
8. 10.1039/C7NR00023E10.1039/C7NR00023E ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.03410.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.034 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.08.02310.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.08.023 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.04.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2017.04.002 ↗
12. 10.1080/03602559.2016.118563210.1080/03602559.2016.1185632 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tca.2007.08.00710.1016/j.tca.2007.08.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.06810.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.068 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.011 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00707-017-1820-910.1007/s00707-017-1820-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.00310.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.017 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.04810.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.048 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.02210.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.022 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma304288410.3390/ma3042884 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.019 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.03310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.033 ↗
25. 10.1002/macp.20130035510.1002/macp.201300355 ↗
26. 10.1002/mame.20140041910.1002/mame.201400419 ↗