journal article·2026-12Open access

Complementary effect of graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes in fluoro-elastomer matrix

Bismark Mensah, Newman-Adjiri Martey, Boniface Yeboah Antwi, Emmanuel Essien

Abstract

The complementary advantage of carbon nanotubes (C) and graphene oxide sheets (G) was used to form composites with Fluoroelastomer (FKM) via melt solvent/solid mixing techniques and their properties were studied. The hybrid compositions demonstrated better physico-mechanical properties than the single-filled, at lower concentration of the G-loading. At high content of G-sheets, formations of agglomerates were observed, resulting in inferior properties. The hybrid composition FCG (1:1) recorded the highest tensile strength (∼47% > FKM), slightly higher than FCG a (0.1:0.3) by ∼1.9%. FCG a in turn, recorded the fastest cure properties (lowest T 90 and highest CRI), higher cure rheo-mechanical strength indicators (M L , M H and ΔM), high thermal stability (84.3% > FKM based on weight residue (%)). FCG a also recorded the lowest energy dissipation (tanδ), and highest dielectric constant (ɛʹ), which were about 57.7% > FKM. It was observed that enhancement in properties of FCG was mainly due to high content of physical networks (—C—C— or —G—G— and —C—G—) while those in FCG a were mainly as results of chemical links (C—FKM— c —NT—G—FKM— c —G—).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CBAS, University of Ghana

CSIR-Institute of Industrial Research

Department of Agricultural Engineering

References (88)

Show source-provided references
1. Mensah B, Kim HG, Lee J-H, et al. Carbon nanotube-reinforced elastomeric nanocomposites: a review. Int J Soc Netw Min 2015; 6: 211–238.
2. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11265910.1016/j.sna.2021.112659 ↗
4. 10.1177/0731684422114564410.1177/07316844221145644 ↗
5. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.2410.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.24 ↗
6. 10.1002/pen.2413110.1002/pen.24131 ↗
7. 10.5254/1.354776210.5254/1.3547762 ↗
8. 10.5254/rct.82.8370810.5254/rct.82.83708 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10628110.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106281 ↗
10. 10.1002/app.1138110.1002/app.11381 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.05.05210.1016/j.msea.2008.05.052 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-020-72633-z10.1038/s41598-020-72633-z ↗
13. 10.1186/2052-336X-12-5110.1186/2052-336X-12-51 ↗
14. 10.1080/1536383X.2016.117001110.1080/1536383X.2016.1170011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.10906810.1016/j.diamond.2022.109068 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.03810.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.038 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tca.2013.06.00410.1016/j.tca.2013.06.004 ↗
18. 10.1155/2018/247328610.1155/2018/2473286 ↗
19. Hooriabad SF, Safajou-Jahankhanemlou M. Ternary NR/BR/SBR rubber blend in the presence of nano additives. Advanced Journal of Chemistry, Section A 2022; 5: 208–214.
20. 10.1177/0967391123117103510.1177/09673911231171035 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.04110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.041 ↗
22. Network RM and Indicators OT-P. silica-silane reinforced passenger car tire treads.
23. Ozturk O. Performance improvement of natural rubber/carbon black composites by novel coupling agents.
24. 10.1021/ie50359a01510.1021/ie50359a015 ↗
25. Kraus G, Hunt HR. Carbon black for low-hysteresis rubber compositions. Google Patents, 1978.
26. Okado Y, Kawamura M, Tomioka T. Rubber composition comprising furnace carbon black. Google Patents, 1982.
27. 10.5254/1.354764510.5254/1.3547645 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10838510.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108385 ↗
29. 10.1007/s13369-019-04279-710.1007/s13369-019-04279-7 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1209203010.3390/polym12092030 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2255410.1002/pc.22554 ↗
32. 10.1038/nnano.2011.3610.1038/nnano.2011.36 ↗
33. 10.3390/s15071772810.3390/s150717728 ↗
34. 10.1177/1045389X0707987210.1177/1045389X07079872 ↗
35. 10.3390/s14010086810.3390/s140100868 ↗
36. 10.1021/nn503454h10.1021/nn503454h ↗
37. 10.1039/C6TC00607H10.1039/C6TC00607H ↗
38. 10.1038/s41528-022-00135-110.1038/s41528-022-00135-1 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.01810.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.018 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10853-024-10028-510.1007/s10853-024-10028-5 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.01710.1016/j.sna.2018.09.017 ↗
42. 10.1002/app.3977810.1002/app.39778 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10797910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107979 ↗
44. 10.1080/1536383080251590710.1080/15363830802515907 ↗
45. 10.3390/s2203080010.3390/s22030800 ↗
46. 10.1039/D2TC00918H10.1039/D2TC00918H ↗
47. Mensah B, Kumar D, Lee G-B, et al. Gold functionalized-graphene oxide-reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene rubber nanocomposites for piezoresistive and piezoelectric applications. Carbon Lett 2018; 25: 1–13.
48. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.10046110.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100461 ↗
49. 10.1002/app.5294410.1002/app.52944 ↗
50. 10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
51. 10.1002/app.4245710.1002/app.42457 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.172379210.1063/1.1723792 ↗
53. 10.1039/TF958540173110.1039/TF9585401731 ↗
54. Doma A, Kamoun E, Abboudy S, et al. Compatibilization of vulcanized SBR/NBR blends using cis-polybutadiene rubber: influence of blend ratio on elastomer properties. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research 2019; 3: 135–143.
55. 10.1021/nl502059f10.1021/nl502059f ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.11542110.1103/PhysRevB.87.115421 ↗
57. 10.1002/pi.290910.1002/pi.2909 ↗
58. 10.1002/app.3252410.1002/app.32524 ↗
59. 10.1002/app.4064010.1002/app.40640 ↗
60. N Mohan A, Balachandran M, John J, et al. Structural characterization of paraffin wax soot and carbon black by XRD. Asian J Chem 2013; 25: S76–S78.
61. 10.1002/pen.2199710.1002/pen.21997 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.02910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.029 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.491849210.1063/1.4918492 ↗
64. 10.1002/mame.20210096810.1002/mame.202100968 ↗
65. 10.21608/ejs.2007.14903410.21608/ejs.2007.149034 ↗
66. 10.1007/s10965-023-03443-w10.1007/s10965-023-03443-w ↗
67. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.10139710.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101397 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.02610.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.026 ↗
69. 10.1155/2022/803838610.1155/2022/8038386 ↗
70. 10.3390/polym1423505610.3390/polym14235056 ↗
71. 10.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/01208110.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/012081 ↗
72. 10.1002/pc.2407210.1002/pc.24072 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e1197410.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11974 ↗
74. 10.1177/0892705723121121810.1177/08927057231211218 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e0150110.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01501 ↗
76. Zhang W, Zang Y, Lu Y, et al. Thermal decomposition of brominated butyl rubber. Thermal Decomposition of Brominated Butyl Rubber 2021; 14: 6767.
77. 10.1155/2020/469421310.1155/2020/4694213 ↗
78. 10.3390/membranes1205051710.3390/membranes12050517 ↗
79. 10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00117-310.1016/S0014-3057(01)00117-3 ↗
80. 10.1063/1.491987710.1063/1.4919877 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.18430110.1103/PhysRevB.80.184301 ↗
82. Zhang H, Xing W, Li H, et al. Fundamental researches on graphene/rubber nanocomposites. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 2019; 2: 32–41.
83. Wang Z Nelson JK Hillborg H et al. Nonlinear conductivity and dielectric response of graphene oxide filled silicone rubber nanocomposites. In: Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP) 2012 Annual Report Conference on 14-17 Montreal Quebec Canada Oct. 2012 2012 pp. 40–43.10.1109/CEIDP.2012.6378717 ↗
84. 10.1002/app.3016610.1002/app.30166 ↗
85. 10.5923/j.ijmc.20120203.0610.5923/j.ijmc.20120203.06 ↗
86. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.3110.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.31 ↗
87. 10.1002/adma.20060070310.1002/adma.200600703 ↗
88. 10.1002/adma.20080175810.1002/adma.200801758 ↗