Complementary effect of graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes in fluoro-elastomer matrix
Source abstract
Abstract
The complementary advantage of carbon nanotubes (C) and graphene oxide sheets (G) was used to form composites with Fluoroelastomer (FKM) via melt solvent/solid mixing techniques and their properties were studied. The hybrid compositions demonstrated better physico-mechanical properties than the single-filled, at lower concentration of the G-loading. At high content of G-sheets, formations of agglomerates were observed, resulting in inferior properties. The hybrid composition FCG (1:1) recorded the highest tensile strength (∼47% > FKM), slightly higher than FCG a (0.1:0.3) by ∼1.9%. FCG a in turn, recorded the fastest cure properties (lowest T 90 and highest CRI), higher cure rheo-mechanical strength indicators (M L , M H and ΔM), high thermal stability (84.3% > FKM based on weight residue (%)). FCG a also recorded the lowest energy dissipation (tanδ), and highest dielectric constant (ɛʹ), which were about 57.7% > FKM. It was observed that enhancement in properties of FCG was mainly due to high content of physical networks (—C—C— or —G—G— and —C—G—) while those in FCG a were mainly as results of chemical links (C—FKM— c —NT—G—FKM— c —G—).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CBAS, University of Ghana
CSIR-Institute of Industrial Research
Department of Agricultural Engineering
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. Mensah B, Kim HG, Lee J-H, et al. Carbon nanotube-reinforced elastomeric nanocomposites: a review. Int J Soc Netw Min 2015; 6: 211–238.
2. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11265910.1016/j.sna.2021.112659 ↗
4. 10.1177/0731684422114564410.1177/07316844221145644 ↗
5. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.2410.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.24 ↗
6. 10.1002/pen.2413110.1002/pen.24131 ↗
7. 10.5254/1.354776210.5254/1.3547762 ↗
8. 10.5254/rct.82.8370810.5254/rct.82.83708 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10628110.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106281 ↗
10. 10.1002/app.1138110.1002/app.11381 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.05.05210.1016/j.msea.2008.05.052 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-020-72633-z10.1038/s41598-020-72633-z ↗
13. 10.1186/2052-336X-12-5110.1186/2052-336X-12-51 ↗
14. 10.1080/1536383X.2016.117001110.1080/1536383X.2016.1170011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.10906810.1016/j.diamond.2022.109068 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.03810.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.038 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tca.2013.06.00410.1016/j.tca.2013.06.004 ↗
18. 10.1155/2018/247328610.1155/2018/2473286 ↗
19. Hooriabad SF, Safajou-Jahankhanemlou M. Ternary NR/BR/SBR rubber blend in the presence of nano additives. Advanced Journal of Chemistry, Section A 2022; 5: 208–214.
20. 10.1177/0967391123117103510.1177/09673911231171035 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.04110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.041 ↗
22. Network RM and Indicators OT-P. silica-silane reinforced passenger car tire treads.
23. Ozturk O. Performance improvement of natural rubber/carbon black composites by novel coupling agents.
24. 10.1021/ie50359a01510.1021/ie50359a015 ↗
25. Kraus G, Hunt HR. Carbon black for low-hysteresis rubber compositions. Google Patents, 1978.
26. Okado Y, Kawamura M, Tomioka T. Rubber composition comprising furnace carbon black. Google Patents, 1982.
27. 10.5254/1.354764510.5254/1.3547645 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10838510.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108385 ↗
29. 10.1007/s13369-019-04279-710.1007/s13369-019-04279-7 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1209203010.3390/polym12092030 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2255410.1002/pc.22554 ↗
32. 10.1038/nnano.2011.3610.1038/nnano.2011.36 ↗
33. 10.3390/s15071772810.3390/s150717728 ↗
34. 10.1177/1045389X0707987210.1177/1045389X07079872 ↗
35. 10.3390/s14010086810.3390/s140100868 ↗
36. 10.1021/nn503454h10.1021/nn503454h ↗
37. 10.1039/C6TC00607H10.1039/C6TC00607H ↗
38. 10.1038/s41528-022-00135-110.1038/s41528-022-00135-1 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.01810.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.018 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10853-024-10028-510.1007/s10853-024-10028-5 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.01710.1016/j.sna.2018.09.017 ↗
42. 10.1002/app.3977810.1002/app.39778 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10797910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107979 ↗
44. 10.1080/1536383080251590710.1080/15363830802515907 ↗
45. 10.3390/s2203080010.3390/s22030800 ↗
46. 10.1039/D2TC00918H10.1039/D2TC00918H ↗
47. Mensah B, Kumar D, Lee G-B, et al. Gold functionalized-graphene oxide-reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene rubber nanocomposites for piezoresistive and piezoelectric applications. Carbon Lett 2018; 25: 1–13.
48. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.10046110.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100461 ↗
49. 10.1002/app.5294410.1002/app.52944 ↗
50. 10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
51. 10.1002/app.4245710.1002/app.42457 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.172379210.1063/1.1723792 ↗
53. 10.1039/TF958540173110.1039/TF9585401731 ↗
54. Doma A, Kamoun E, Abboudy S, et al. Compatibilization of vulcanized SBR/NBR blends using cis-polybutadiene rubber: influence of blend ratio on elastomer properties. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research 2019; 3: 135–143.
55. 10.1021/nl502059f10.1021/nl502059f ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.11542110.1103/PhysRevB.87.115421 ↗
57. 10.1002/pi.290910.1002/pi.2909 ↗
58. 10.1002/app.3252410.1002/app.32524 ↗
59. 10.1002/app.4064010.1002/app.40640 ↗
60. N Mohan A, Balachandran M, John J, et al. Structural characterization of paraffin wax soot and carbon black by XRD. Asian J Chem 2013; 25: S76–S78.
61. 10.1002/pen.2199710.1002/pen.21997 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.02910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.029 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.491849210.1063/1.4918492 ↗
64. 10.1002/mame.20210096810.1002/mame.202100968 ↗
65. 10.21608/ejs.2007.14903410.21608/ejs.2007.149034 ↗
66. 10.1007/s10965-023-03443-w10.1007/s10965-023-03443-w ↗
67. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.10139710.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101397 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.02610.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.026 ↗
69. 10.1155/2022/803838610.1155/2022/8038386 ↗
70. 10.3390/polym1423505610.3390/polym14235056 ↗
71. 10.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/01208110.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/012081 ↗
72. 10.1002/pc.2407210.1002/pc.24072 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e1197410.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11974 ↗
74. 10.1177/0892705723121121810.1177/08927057231211218 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e0150110.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01501 ↗
76. Zhang W, Zang Y, Lu Y, et al. Thermal decomposition of brominated butyl rubber. Thermal Decomposition of Brominated Butyl Rubber 2021; 14: 6767.
77. 10.1155/2020/469421310.1155/2020/4694213 ↗
78. 10.3390/membranes1205051710.3390/membranes12050517 ↗
79. 10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00117-310.1016/S0014-3057(01)00117-3 ↗
80. 10.1063/1.491987710.1063/1.4919877 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.18430110.1103/PhysRevB.80.184301 ↗
82. Zhang H, Xing W, Li H, et al. Fundamental researches on graphene/rubber nanocomposites. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 2019; 2: 32–41.
83. Wang Z Nelson JK Hillborg H et al. Nonlinear conductivity and dielectric response of graphene oxide filled silicone rubber nanocomposites. In: Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP) 2012 Annual Report Conference on 14-17 Montreal Quebec Canada Oct. 2012 2012 pp. 40–43.10.1109/CEIDP.2012.6378717 ↗
84. 10.1002/app.3016610.1002/app.30166 ↗
85. 10.5923/j.ijmc.20120203.0610.5923/j.ijmc.20120203.06 ↗
86. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.3110.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.31 ↗
87. 10.1002/adma.20060070310.1002/adma.200600703 ↗
88. 10.1002/adma.20080175810.1002/adma.200801758 ↗