Effects of Molecular Weight of Polypropylene on the Correlation between Fracture Toughness and Mechanical/Impact Properties of Gfpp Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The accurate prediction of scientific and statistical parameters depends, largely, on the functional correlation between the variables involved, as well as their definite and predictable behaviour around the line of best fit (the regression line). Hence, an accurate and reliable prediction of the fracture toughness and mechanical properties of glass fibre reinforced polypropylene (GFPP) composites is very important in order to prevent sudden failure of components fabricated from them. It also gives the opportunity to save cost on experimentation. Three grades of polypropylene (PP) of different molecular weights (M W ) had glass fibre reinforcements each. The incorporation of maleic anhydride grafted PP (MA-g-PP) into the composites was for compatibilisation between the matrix and reinforcements. There was tensile testing on both the un-notched and notched dumbbell samples. The use of J-Integral analysis was to investigate the fracture toughness of the composites. There was an evaluation of the effect of different M W of PP on the fracture toughness and impact properties of the composites. The examination of the morphology of the materials was by (SEM), while charge coupled device (CCD) camera monitored crack propagation behaviour under tensile loading. There was further morphology study to analyse the fibre length distribution and interfacial shear strength of the composites. Investigations revealed that the composite with the lowest M W PP consistently showed better mechanical, impact and fracture toughness properties than those with higher M W PP. It was also observed that incorporating MA-g-PP as compatibilisers had greater interfacial bonding effects, resulting in higher interfacial shear strength in GFPP of lower M W and high melt flow rates than those of higher M W and low melt flow rate. The investigation further revealed that as the M W of PP decreased, the fracture toughness and other mechanical properties increased in a linear correlation. Crack propagation trailed the interface between PP matrix and GF because of weak bonding in the composite with higher M W PP. This study revealed that incorporating MA-g-PP into GFPP composites achieved better properties with PP of lower M W and higher melt flow rate. Hence the mechanical and fracture properties of GFPP depend largely on the M W of the polymer PP matrix. There was a strong linear correlation observed between the M W of PP, fracture toughness and other impact properties thereby making it possible to make a reliable prediction of any property of the composites from another.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Fibro Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Matsugasaki, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606–8585, Japan
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Brown W.F. · 1964
2. AndersonT.L., Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, (2nd ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, 117–204 (1995).
3. Wang C.H. · 1996 · 1
4. WilliamsJ.G., and PavanA., Fracture of Polymers, Composites and Adhesives, ESIS Publications, 27 370.
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.019 ↗
6. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0054546710.1007/BF00545467 ↗
8. 10.1002/1097-4628(20001213)78:12<2047::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/1097-4628(20001213)78:12<2047::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
9. MartinsE.T., and FirthJ.R., Statistics, Mitchell Beazley, London, 84 (1983).
10. 10.1002/pc.1053310.1002/pc.10533 ↗
11. Arroyo M. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1997 · 38 · 5587
12. 10.1002/app.1109510.1002/app.11095 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.1053410.1002/pc.10534 ↗
14. Youssef Y. · Polym. Eng. Sci. · 1999 · 19 · 301
15. 10.1007/BF0054365410.1007/BF00543654 ↗
16. Callister W. · 1994
17. Eggert A. · Adv. Comp. Letters · 1998 · 7 · 5
18. Wells A.A. · Unstable Crack Propagation in Metals: Cleavage and Fast Fracture, Proceedings of the Crack Propagation Symposium · 1961 · 1 · 14
19. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990307)71:10<1537::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990307)71:10<1537::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
20. Buckley C.P. · 2005
21. Tada H. · 1985
22. 10.1243/03093247V01214510.1243/03093247V012145 ↗
23. McClintockF.A., and IrwinG.R., Plasticity Aspects of Fracture Mechanics, Fracture Toughness, Testing and its Applications, ASTM STP 381, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 8.1–1 (1965), 13.
24. Prij J. · 1980
25. 10.1016/0001-6160(65)90206-310.1016/0001-6160(65)90206-3 ↗
26. Hertzberg R. · 1996
27. 10.1002/app.1160910.1002/app.11609 ↗
28. 10.1520/STP514-EB10.1520/STP514-EB ↗
29. 10.1520/STP381-EB10.1520/STP381-EB ↗
30. CheremisinoffN.P. (Ed.), Handbook of Polymer Science and Technology Vol. 4 Composites and Specialty Applications , Marcel Dekker, New York, 1–54, (1989).
31. KarianH.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Polypropylene and Polypropylene Composites, Marcel Dekker, New York, 263–334 (1999).
32. KawA.K., Mechanics of Composite Materials, CRC Press, New York, 1–35 (1997).
33. Karger-KocsisJ., Polypropylene - Structure, blends and composites Vol. 2: Copolymers and Blends , Chapman and Hall, London, 1–23 (1995).10.1007/978-94-011-0523-1 ↗
34. Karger-KocsisJ., Polypropylene - Structure, blends and composites Vol. 3: Composites , Chapman and Hall, London, 229–262 (1995).10.1007/978-94-011-0567-5 ↗
35. OlagokeO. (Ed.), Handbook of Thermoplastics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1017–1034 (1997).