journal article·2024-01Open access

An in vitro cytotoxicity study on PANI/ZnO nanocomposites against HCT- 116 cancer cells using MTT assay

D Sudhadevi, P Jayamurugan, G Srinivas, B Suresh, Abha Gupta, Raman Rajeshkumar, Ubaidullah Mohd, Abdullah A Al-Kahtani, Ashok Kumar

Abstract

Polyaniline/ZnO nanocomposites were synthesized with different weight percentage of ZnO (20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) using an in situ chemical polymerization method. The prepared composite samples were characterized by FT-IR, XRD, TEM, SEM with EDAX, UV-Vis, PL, electrical conductivity, photocatalytic properties, antibacterial and anticancer activity. The presence of functional groups in PANI-ZnO NCs is identified by FTIR spectral analysis. X-ray diffraction patterns show that the nanocomposites exhibit preferential orientational growth along the (002) plane with a hexagonal wurtzite structure. The intensity of the maximum reflection (101) increases with increasing ZnO doping concentrations. The TEM analysis indicates that the spherical shape,the particle size was found to be 36.8 nm. SAED pattern closely matched the peaks of the XRD pattern, confirming that the relevant SAED patterns correspond to hexagonal Wurtzite crystals of ZnO. SEM image shows a spherical morphology and ZnO nanoparticles are homogeniously mixed with PANI matrix. EDAX analysis showed the presence of Zn, C and O.UV-vis absorption spectra reveals increasing wavelength leads to the redshift in which there is a strong interaction between PANI and PANI/ZnO. The band gap energy of PANI/ZnO NCs is decreased to 1.30 eV by adding different concentrations of ZnO. PL analysis showed that the addition of ZnO dopants reduced the bandgap and increased oxygen defect vacancies of PANI/ZnO composites. An increase in ZnO content in the PANI matrix was also seen to cause a decrease in electrical conductivity. This alteration might be connected to ZnO’s doping and dedoping activity in the PANI matrix. Photocatalytic activity of 80 wt%ZnO-doped PANI-NPs through the degradation of methylene blue (MB) pigment studied under UV-A light and had detected 95% of degradation throughout 260 min. The lowest bandgap of 80 wt% ZnO shows the highest photocatalytic MB degradation performance. PANI/ZnO nanocomposite with high concentration of ZnO had good antibacterial activity against both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. An in vitro study was used to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of PANI and PANI/ZnO NPs on the HCT-116 cell line. The results of the MTT test reveal that PANI/ZnO NPs have a significantly greater cytotoxic effect on the HCT-116 cell line than PANI.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Sri Ramakrishna Mission Vidyalaya College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, India

Department of Electronics and Communication Science, SRM Arts and Science College, Kattankulathur, India

Engineering Department, University of Technology and Applied Sciences-IBRA, North Al Sharqia Region, Oman

School of Life Sciences (Ooty Campus), JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research Deemed to be University, Ooty, India

Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Ooty, India

Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, India

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jccs.20170047710.1002/jccs.201700477 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41598-023-41106-410.1038/s41598-023-41106-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10309410.1016/j.surfin.2023.103094 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.catcom.2019.10586010.1016/j.catcom.2019.105860 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cis.2022.10283010.1016/j.cis.2022.102830 ↗
6. 10.1021/jp308341910.1021/jp3083419 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.12.01510.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.12.015 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5RA07811C10.1039/C5RA07811C ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.12210.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.122 ↗
10. Wang Y · Sci Rep · 2016 · 63
11. 10.1021/am201221x10.1021/am201221x ↗
12. Zhu L-Y · Overview · 2023 · 15 · 89
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.00310.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.17810.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.178 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.3647510.1002/app.36475 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.03610.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.036 ↗
17. 10.14233/ajchem.2014.1627410.14233/ajchem.2014.16274 ↗
18. Eskizeybek V · J Fac Eng Arch Selcuk Univ · 2012 · 27 · 111
19. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.09.01210.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.09.012 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msec.2004.11.00310.1016/j.msec.2004.11.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2007.06.00210.1016/j.ceramint.2007.06.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2009.08.05610.1016/j.synthmet.2009.08.056 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00672-510.1016/S0379-6779(01)00672-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cossms.2009.01.00110.1016/j.cossms.2009.01.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.01.03310.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.01.033 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2005.06.02110.1016/j.synthmet.2005.06.021 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.083 ↗
28. Shahnaz M · Sci Direct · 2019 · 14 · 100179
29. 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.05110.1016/j.aej.2021.06.051 ↗
30. RahmaniKukia N · Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP · 2018 · 19 · 2821
31. 10.1039/D2RA02717H10.1039/D2RA02717H ↗
32. 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.05110.1016/j.aej.2021.06.051 ↗
33. 10.22146/ijc.7687210.22146/ijc.76872 ↗
34. 10.3390/separations1002007810.3390/separations10020078 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10904-021-02133-810.1007/s10904-021-02133-8 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.03310.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.033 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10876-022-02348-w10.1007/s10876-022-02348-w ↗
38. 10.3390/ijerph2003200210.3390/ijerph20032002 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.04.01710.1016/j.arabjc.2015.04.017 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.rechem.2020.10004610.1016/j.rechem.2020.100046 ↗
41. 10.1007/s40010-019-00612-910.1007/s40010-019-00612-9 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.12010.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.120 ↗
43. Kumar H · Physics and Astronomy · 2013 · 19 · 26
44. Khan S · Journal of Advances in Chemical Science · 2018 · 6 · 71
45. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab2c5f10.1088/2053-1591/ab2c5f ↗
46. 10.1007/s10854-016-5117-x10.1007/s10854-016-5117-x ↗
47. 10.1007/s00339-019-2852-x10.1007/s00339-019-2852-x ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16267110.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162671 ↗
49. Meena PL · Results Chem · 2023 · 5 · 2211
50. 10.1039/c2jm33093h10.1039/c2jm33093h ↗
51. Shah M · Express · 2020 · 7 · 015314
52. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2008.10.01010.1016/j.synthmet.2008.10.010 ↗
53. 10.1007/s13726-012-0119-x10.1007/s13726-012-0119-x ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.11610.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.116 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.02.01610.1016/j.jwpe.2019.02.016 ↗
56. 10.1002/slct.20200047510.1002/slct.202000475 ↗
57. Kusdianto K, Kusuma TC, Hudandini M, et al. Characterizations of Ag doped ZnO particles via flame pyrolysis method for degrada tion of methylene bluecharacterizations of Ag doped ZnO particles via flame pyrolysis method for degradation of methylene blue 2019; 673: 012012.10.1088/1757-899X/673/1/012012 ↗
58. 10.3390/ijms13101224210.3390/ijms131012242 ↗
59. 10.1007/s11270-024-07311-110.1007/s11270-024-07311-1 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.snb.2011.03.03610.1016/j.snb.2011.03.036 ↗
61. 10.1007/s12668-023-01103-310.1007/s12668-023-01103-3 ↗