Breaking water-in-oil emulsion of Northern Iraq’s crude oil using commercial polymers and surfactants
Source abstract
Abstract
Water (W) and oil (O) normally mix during production and while passing through valves and pumps to form a persistent water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion, which is a serious restriction in oil production and transporting and refining processes. The objective of this work is to treat emulsions of two crude oil samples labeled KD1 and DGH2 using commercial polymers and surfactants which are also known as demulsifiers. Hydrophile–lipophile balance (HLB) in the demulsifier structure has demonstrated a great effect on breaking W/O emulsion. Emulsion breakers with low HLB value showed better reduction in the dynamic IFT, high diffusivity at the W/O interface, and accelerated coalescence of water droplets. Concomitantly, high emulsion temperatures were found to reduce the interfacial film viscosity and accelerate water droplets coalescence. A maximum water separation efficiency (WSE) of 97% was achieved in the case of KD1 and 88% for DGH2, and using a (1:1) polymer blend demulsifier further increased WSE to 99% after 100 min.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Petroleum Processing and Analysis · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Petroleum Processes Engineering, College of Petroleum and Minerals Engineering, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq
Petroleum Laboratories Department, Ministry of Natural Resource, Erbil, Iraq
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq
Quality Control Department, Ministry of Industry and Minerals, Erbil, Iraq
School of Chemical & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computing, Kingston University, London, UK
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Udonne JD · J Petro Gas Eng · 2012 · 3 · 135
2. Noïk CH
3. 10.2174/187483410171001026310.2174/1874834101710010263 ↗
4. 10.1021/ef900596y10.1021/ef900596y ↗
5. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.05.01010.1016/j.fuproc.2011.05.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.03210.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.032 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11743-010-1200-010.1007/s11743-010-1200-0 ↗
8. Salager JL · 2001
9. 10.1007/0-387-68903-6_2110.1007/0-387-68903-6_21 ↗
10. 10.1590/S0100-4042201000080000910.1590/S0100-40422010000800009 ↗
11. 10.1590/0104-6632.20150321s0000275510.1590/0104-6632.20150321s00002755 ↗
12. 10.1155/2013/79310110.1155/2013/793101 ↗
13. Chandran K · J Appl Sci Agric · 2014 · 9 · 245
14. Atta AM · Int J Electrochem Science · 2013 · 8 · 947410.1016/S1452-3981(23)12987-7 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.fluid.2013.11.01410.1016/j.fluid.2013.11.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.petrol.2010.02.00510.1016/j.petrol.2010.02.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.05.00810.1016/j.ejpe.2016.05.008 ↗
18. 10.1201/978082474734310.1201/9780824747343 ↗
19. 10.1021/ef060388510.1021/ef0603885 ↗
20. 10.1021/ef101236h10.1021/ef101236h ↗
21. Gong C
22. 10.1039/c3sm52168k10.1039/c3sm52168k ↗
23. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.03110.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.031 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.05110.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.051 ↗