journal article·2021-11

Influence of the printing parameters on the properties of Poly(lactic acid) scaffolds obtained by fused deposition modeling 3D printing

Abraão CD Nascimento, Raquel CDAG Mota, Livia RD Menezes, Emerson OD Silva

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 29· Issue 9_suppl
Publisher page

Abstract

3D printing techniques are of great interest in the sector of scaffold development aiming for bone tissue regeneration mainly due to the possibility of customizing the scaffold according to the area of the bone defect to be regenerated. Among the 3D printing techniques, the fused deposition modeling (FDM) stands out as promising because it does not require the use of solvents and toxic components throughout the manufacturing process of the scaffold. In this sense, the present article aims to evaluate the influence of the printing speed and the temperature of the printing head on the properties of poly(lactic acid) scaffolds. Three speeds of the printing head (4600 mm/min, 480 mm/min, and 500 mm/min) and two different extrusion temperatures (200 o C and 220 o C) were evaluated, maintaining the architecture and all other printing conditions constant. After obtaining the scaffolds, they were characterized by the following techniques: Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance (TD-NMR), compressive modulus, L929 cell viability, and enzymatic degradation. The results obtained showed that the increase in printing temperature and speed was able to influence some properties of the material: increase crystallinity, compressive modulus, thermal resistance, and reduce molecular mobility and enzymatic degradation rate of the scaffolds. These findings are promising and indicate that, by altering only the basic parameters of 3D printing, it is possible to modulate the properties of the scaffolds obtained, to achieve greater crystallinity and a superior compressive modulus.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Instituto de Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano (IMA), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz672510.1126/sciadv.aaz6725 ↗
2. 10.1155/2019/610581810.1155/2019/6105818 ↗
3. 10.4236/msa.2016.7803910.4236/msa.2016.78039 ↗
4. 10.3390/app1005157110.3390/app10051571 ↗
5. 10.4236/msa.2018.9804910.4236/msa.2018.98049 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.00710.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.a.3628910.1002/jbm.a.36289 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.01010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.010 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.03110.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.031 ↗
10. 10.1186/s13036-017-0074-310.1186/s13036-017-0074-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.03410.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.034 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.02010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.020 ↗
13. 10.1088/1748-3190/ab124310.1088/1748-3190/ab1243 ↗
14. ISO 10993‐5:2009 (2009) · 2009
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.10610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.106 ↗
16. Shankar S · Int J Biol · 2018 · 107 · 1724
17. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.04.01010.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.04.010 ↗
18. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.5310.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.53 ↗
19. Rogovina SZ · Poly Sci B · 2019 · 61 · 334
20. Oliveira JE · Adv Mater Sci Eng · 2013 · 1
21. 10.1007/s00289-016-1635-110.1007/s00289-016-1635-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 ↗
23. Ali NA · Chem Mater Res · 2014 · 6 · 45
24. Siriprom W · Mater Today · 2018 · 5 · 14803
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.01810.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.018 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00289-017-2114-z10.1007/s00289-017-2114-z ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.04410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.044 ↗
28. 10.1166/jnn.2017.1267910.1166/jnn.2017.12679 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1308200510.3390/ma13082005 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym901001810.3390/polym9010018 ↗
31. 10.1039/C7RA05422J10.1039/C7RA05422J ↗
32. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12648710.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126487 ↗
33. 10.1002/pat.461510.1002/pat.4615 ↗
34. Gitari B · BioResources · 2019 · 14 · 186710.15376/biores.14.1.1867-1889 ↗
35. Mota RC · Sciences (IRJPMS) · 2019 · 2 · 55
36. Rocha ACSR · J Compos Mater · 2020 · 002199832092777
37. 10.4236/anp.2018.7100210.4236/anp.2018.71002 ↗
38. 10.1166/jnn.2016.1176010.1166/jnn.2016.11760 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.03310.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.033 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.00910.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.009 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.09.01710.1016/j.triboint.2015.09.017 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym810035610.3390/polym8100356 ↗
43. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19961130)34:16<2701::AID-POLB2>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19961130)34:16<2701::AID-POLB2>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
44. Donate R · Ver Adv Mater Sci · 2020 · 59 · 170