journal article·2021-07Open access

Effect of drop weight impact on the torsional-loading behavior of filament wound and prepreg-wrapped composite tubes

Ibrahim Fadil Soykok, Hamza Tas, Okan Ozdemir, Halis Kandas

Polymers and Polymer Composites· Volume 29· Issue 6

Abstract

This article presents an experimental study on the torsional behavior of composite tubes subjected to impact loadings. Four types of composite tubes with the winding angle of 30°, 45°, 60°, and 75° ([±30] FW , [±45] FW , [±60] FW , and [±75] FW ) were produced with the filament winding method. Besides, a [0,90] PP composite tube was manufactured with the prepreg wrapping technique. After the composite tubes were impacted at 2.5 J, 5.0 J, and 7.5 J, non-impacted and impacted composite tubes were tested under torsional loading. Contact force–deformation curves of impacted tubes are presented. Torsional moment–twist angle relations for both impacted and non-impacted composite tubes were obtained. In addition, front view and side view of the impacted zone of composite tubes are given. The results showed that sample [±60] FW had the best impact performance with regard to absorbed energy. The impacted samples of [±60] FW and [±75] FW had the lowest torsional strength for each energy level.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechatronics Engineering, H.F.T. Faculty of Technology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Turgutlu, Manisa, Turkey

Department of Mechanical Engineering, H.F.T. Faculty of Technology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Turgutlu, Manisa, Turkey

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

Funding

Manisa Celal Bayar University Scientific Research Projects Uni

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Gireesh B · Int J Eng Res Appl · 2013 · 3 · 1510
2. 10.1007/s40430-018-1099-310.1007/s40430-018-1099-3 ↗
3. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab015110.1088/2053-1591/ab0151 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.060 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00184-510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00184-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.06110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.061 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.04210.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.042 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.05.02110.1016/j.matdes.2005.05.021 ↗
9. 10.1177/002199830404247910.1177/0021998304042479 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01510.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.015 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.09810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.098 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.00410.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.004 ↗
13. 10.1177/002199831772204310.1177/0021998317722043 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.05610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.056 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.07310.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.073 ↗
16. 10.1108/MMMS-03-2019-005910.1108/MMMS-03-2019-0059 ↗
17. 10.1080/09243046.2016.120712610.1080/09243046.2016.1207126 ↗
18. Fang P
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.06710.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.067 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.05.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.05.006 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.06910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.069 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.027 ↗
24. 10.1177/002199831141048310.1177/0021998311410483 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.011 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.04910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.049 ↗
27. 10.12783/asc34/3127010.12783/asc34/31270 ↗
28. ASTM D5448/D5448M-11 · 2011
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.047 ↗
30. Zorica D