Dynamic mechanical analysis of nylon 6 fiber-reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene rubber composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Dynamic mechanical properties of polymeric materials are of direct relevance to a range of unique polymer applications. The aim of the study is to investigate the dynamic mechanical properties of composites of short nylon 6 fiber with acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR). The storage modulus (G ′ ), loss modulus (G ″ ), and the damping factor (tan δ) have been analyzed with reference to the effects of fiber loading, curing systems, and bonding agents over a range of temperature and at varying frequencies. The storage modulus increases with increment in fiber loading, whereas loss modulus and damping factor decrease. The glass transition temperature shifts to higher temperature upon increment in fiber loading. Dicumyl peroxide (DCP)–cured composites show higher storage modulus and lower damping than the corresponding sulfur-cured one. The addition of hexa-resorcinol and phthalic anhydride as bonding agents enhances the dynamic mechanical properties of the composites. The experimental results have been evaluated by comparing with Einstein, Guth, and Nielsen models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, MES Keveeyam College Valanchery, Kerala, India
Department of Chemistry, St Thomas College, Trissur, Kerala, India
Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, Calicut, Kerala, India
Department of Chemistry, University of Calicut, Kerala, India
Funding
Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, FIST Programme
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Kevin PM · 1999
2. Murayama T · 1999
3. Nielsen LE · 1974
4. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00172-010.1016/S1359-835X(02)00172-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.028 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.021 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.69210.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.692 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10628910.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106289 ↗
9. Palani S · Mater Today Proc · 2021 · 39 · 1202
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.26210.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.262 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jobab.2021.02.00710.1016/j.jobab.2021.02.007 ↗
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981212)70:11<2121::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981212)70:11<2121::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.004 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0058770110.1007/BF00587701 ↗
15. Murayama T · 1978
16. 10.1007/978-94-011-7816-7_4810.1007/978-94-011-7816-7_48 ↗
17. Thoamson J L · Polym Compos · 1990 · 11 · 10510.1002/pc.750110206 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.2007010.1002/app.20070 ↗
19. 10.1163/15685540878465527410.1163/156855408784655274 ↗
20. Folkes MJ · 1982
21. 10.1002/app.1993.07049091010.1002/app.1993.070490910 ↗
22. Einstein A · 1956
23. 10.1063/1.170749510.1063/1.1707495 ↗